 |
Bill Press is co-host of CNN's Crossfire. He is providing exclusive analysis to CNN allpolitics.com during the election season.
|
Bill Press: Dick Cheney is the perfect choice -- for Democrats
By Bill Press/CNN
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- What a difference one appointment can make.
After months of complaining by down-in-the-mouth Democrats - frustrated by
Gore’s lackluster campaign and Bush’s seemingly well-oiled machine, the tide and
tenor have suddenly improved dramatically.
“Hey, we’re really excited with this Cheney appointment,” a labor leader
called to tell me. “For us, this is money in the bank!” And, indeed, for Democrats, it is.
Aside from Strom Thurmond of South Carolina or North Carolina's Jesse Helms, Dick Cheney is the best choice George Bush could have made.
Strategically, it’s hard to fathom what prompted Bush to pick Cheney. He already had Texas and Wyoming. No help needed from Cheney. He already had the conservative base locked up. No need to pick someone even more conservative than he is. He already had a wealth of energetic and colorful choices: from Arizona's John McCain to Chuck Hagel of Nebraska to Ohio Rep. John Kasich. No need to go for the dullest of all.
I have yet to hear any Bushie explain what Cheney brings to the ticket, other
than the experience and gravitas that Bush himself so clearly lacks. Or is Bush so
cocky about winning that he doesn’t think he needs any help?
But if Cheney brings nothing to the Republican ticket, he is a gold mine to
the Democratic ticket: giving Gore and Democrats a great opportunity and a delicious target.
For Gore, it’s the opportunity, by contrast, to pick a more dynamic running
mate. That won’t be hard. Today’s John Kerry of Massachusetts, Florida's Bob Graham, Evan Bayh of Indiana, House Secretary Andrew Cuomo and Dick Durbin of Illinois are all younger and more exciting than yesterday’s Dick Cheney.
For Democrats, it’s the opportunity to paint both Bush and Cheney as too far
right and too far out of the mainstream for most Americans. Indeed, Cheney’s not just a conservative, he’s an extreme, right-wing conservative.
In his 12 years in Congress, Cheney voted against the ERA; against funding
for Head Start; against refunding for the Clean Water Act; against creation of the
Department of Education; against funding for Superfund; against the Older Americans Act, providing food and support for poor senior citizens; against a resolution asking the South African government to release Nelson Mandela from prison. Cheney makes Newt Gingrich look like a liberal.
And this is the man Bush has selected as his “partner in a vision to renew
America’s purpose”? Whatever happened to the compassion in compassionate conservative?
What’s funny now is hearing the howls of protest from the Bush camp over
reaction to Cheney’s appointment. First, they accuse reporters of “distorting”
Cheney’s record, which is utter nonsense. His votes are all recorded in the Congressional Record. And the Congressional Record does not lie.
Second, they argue it’s not fair holding someone responsible for his actions
15 or 20 years ago. That’s strange. Hasn’t the Bush campaign attacked Al Gore for his misguided votes in Congress, 20 years ago, against federal funding for abortion? And isn’t Ken Starr’s office still conducting a Republican-led investigation into a failed real estate deal in Arkansas -- remember Whitewater -- that happened exactly 15 years ago?
If truth be told, the real reason the Bush campaign doesn’t want anybody
raising questions about what happened 20 years ago is because they don’t want George W. Bush to have to answer still-lingering questions about possible cocaine use in his “wild years.”
It is curious, isn’t it? Twenty-five years ago, Dick Cheney was President
Ford’s Chief of Staff. What was G. W. doing 25 years ago, and why won’t he tell us?
Bottom line. Dick Cheney’s the best vice-presidential nominee since Dan
Quayle. His selection is the first flat tire for the Bush campaign. It’s not exactly like
handing Al Gore the keys to the White House, but it does give Gore an excellent opening to pull ahead.
We’ll know soon if the vice-president takes advantage of it.
|