ad info

 
CNN.com  technology > computing
    Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
TECHNOLOGY
TOP STORIES

Consumer group: Online privacy protections fall short

Guide to a wired Super Bowl

Debate opens on making e-commerce law consistent

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

More than 11,000 killed in India quake

Mideast negotiators want to continue talks after Israeli elections

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

U.S.

POLITICS

LAW

ENTERTAINMENT

HEALTH

TRAVEL

FOOD

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
 
CNN Websites
Networks image


Napster fires last written shot in court case

Computerworld

(IDG) -- Controversial music distributor Napster Inc. fired off its last written salvo before it meets with the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in court Oct. 2.

The Napster brief, which was filed yesterday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, said the RIAA "disregarded key language in the [Audio Home Recording Act] and substituted words that better suited their purpose." The San Mateo, Calif.-based company went on to argue that the act didn't restrict "some primarily musical audio recordings" and that that copyright law protects free downloading of songs online.

  MESSAGE BOARD
 

Napster also referred to the Sony Betamax ruling, in which the Supreme Court allowed the company's VCRs to be sold even though they could be used to pirate copies of movies.

"The recording industry is attempting in this case to try to maintain control over music distribution. By repeatedly refusing Napster's offers of a reasonable license and opposing a compulsory license, they have demonstrated that they are not seeking to be appropriately compensated, but rather to kill or control a technology they view as competition," said Napster attorney David Boies in the statement. Boies was the special Department of Justice attorney in its antitrust case against Microsoft Corp.

MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
IDG.net   IDG.net home page
  Computerworld's home page
  Napster replies to Appeals Court
 

Napster's shot is the latest in an ongoing battle between the online music file-sharing service and the recording industry. The fallout began July 26 when U.S. District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel ordered Napster to halt the sending of copyrighted material over the Internet (see "Judge: MP3.com 'willfully violated' copyright law," link below). But the upstart service was given a reprieve by delaying the injunction, pending the results of Napster's appeal.




RELATED STORIES:
Universities asked to restrict access to Napster
September 12, 2000
Justice sides with recording industry on key issue in Napster court fight
September 8, 2000
Report: Napster banned at 34 percent of U.S. colleges
August 31, 2000
Industry groups object to Napster ruling
August 29, 2000
Napster stirs apprehension in movie industry
August 28, 2000

RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
Judge: MP3.com 'willfully violated' copyright law
(Computerworld)
Napster CEO isn't running
(IDG.net)
Recording industry group urges court to uphold Napster ruling
(Computerworld)
Napster replies to Appeals Court
(IDG.net)
How Napster made e-music chime
(IDG.net)
MP3.com CEO defends exchange
(Network World Fusion)
RIAA urges a stop to Napster
(IDG.net)
Universities get schooled on Napster
(The Industry Standard)

RELATED SITES:
Napster attorney David Boies's statement
Napster Inc.
Napster legal briefs
The Recording Industry Association of America Inc. (RIAA)

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.

 Search   

Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.