ad info  technology > computing
    Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  




Consumer group: Online privacy protections fall short

Guide to a wired Super Bowl

Debate opens on making e-commerce law consistent



More than 11,000 killed in India quake

Mideast negotiators want to continue talks after Israeli elections


4:30pm ET, 4/16










CNN Websites
Networks image

Analysis: The Napster knockoffs: Are their tunes different?

PC World

(IDG) -- It's no secret that Napster is playing a precarious tune. It's challenged both in the courtroom--from music industry stalwarts campaigning to shut down the music-sharing site for piracy--and on the Web from upstarts who say they can out-file-share Napster.

The incredible popularity of the music trading service is spawning several new sites every week, and sometimes more. Often, there's something approaching arrogance in the way these newcomers distance themselves from Napster as they try to cash in on Napster's customer base, while ducking its legal troubles.

"By ingeniously using technology that maximizes existing has accomplished what copycat sites only dream of," barks a press release from, a service that lets users stream music from their hard drives, but, unlike Napster, prohibits actually copying the files.

  PC World home page
  That's (digital) entertainment!
  Presidential hopefuls wrangle over Napster on Web
  RIAA creating online royalty collective
  Reviews & in-depth info at
  E-Business World
  Questions about computers? Let's editors help you
  Subscribe to's free daily newsletters
  Search in 12 languages
  News Radio
  * Fusion audio primers
  * Computerworld Minute

"Welcome to," offers another release, from, "where you don't need to worry about being sued whenever you download a song." The site claims to use the "honor system", and as with shareware, you are encouraged to pay a small fee to each artist (but only if you keep the MP3 for more than 30 days). The problem? Only a handful of artists are on the site, unlike the terabytes of music on Napster, Scour, and many others.

How many others? I've test-driven 15 music-sharing sites in the last month, from Aimster to XNapster. Some require a client download, and some are Web based. But they all want to help you find and listen to music over the Internet.

Sorting Their Subtle Songs

Sites are sorting into several categories. First is the Napster clone. These include Scour (which is still operating, but recently filed for bankruptcy) and IMesh. These tools are similar in look and function. Not surprisingly, both Scour and Napster are being sued by the Recording Industry Association of America.

Each of these music services has an enormous customer base, and all three suffer from near-crippling traffic at various times of day. Napster experienced a spike in traffic when a court ruling or injunction was imminent; some competitors also enjoyed an upsurge.

Other services offer direct, peer-to-peer interaction between users, without using a central server as Napster does. These include Gnutella and FreeNet. They also offer interfaces that only a programmer could love.

Finally, several music sites offer wares through a Web-based interface. These services may also provide a client for you to download and install, but much of their appeal is in the capability to search the contents of customers' hard drives, right from the Web, as if you were using an old-fashioned search engine. These sites include IMesh (which also has a client download) and Surfy (which lets you search the Web, Gnutella, and Napster from its site).

Legal Challenges Continue

Some argue that unlike Napster, Web-based music search services receive special protection under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. That's because it is nearly impossible to monitor or review the information to which they link, says Kurt Opsahl, an Internet law expert with Perkins Coie.

"It is still too early to sound the death knell for peer-to-peer MP3 sharing technologies," Opsahl says. "Congress provided this safe harbor, because they wanted to provide protection so that the information location industry could provide this useful service."

And while these services claim to succeed where Napster fails, a problem remains. Whether you love or hate Napster, it's hard to deny that few of its musical competitors offer as robust an interface, whether on your PC or via the Web.

So among this crowded chorus of Napster wannabes, does any provide a hearty and intuitive service that appeals to customers but avoids the wrath of the record industry?

"No, not right now," says Eric Scheirer, an analyst at Forrester Research. "The service consumers want is not what the record labels are currently able to provide. Anybody who is satisfying consumer demand will have to be doing it outside of the sphere of the record labels."

U.S. presidential candidates debate Napster online
October 19, 2000
Scour repositions itself amid Napster controversy
October 10, 2000
Tech glitch brings Napster down
October 4, 2000
Report: Retailers in for bumpy ride with digital music distribution
October 3, 2000
Win or lose, Napster has changed Internet
October 2, 2000

Real Networks, Sony bundle ATRAC3 into new player
BMG makes digital-download plunge
(The Industry Standard) reaches tentative pact with publishers
(The Industry Standard)
Scour files for bankruptcy
RIAA creating online royalty collective
(The Industry Standard)
Portable MP3 players for Mac proliferate
Presidential hopefuls wrangle over Napster on Web
That's (digital) entertainment!
(PC World)

ths Music

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.


Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.