Skip to main content
ad info Books - News
  Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  




Robert Kennedy: The 'younger brother full of pain'

Author's survival tips for women: All you need are 'Three Black Skirts'



More than 1,700 killed in India quake; fear of aftershocks spreads

Bush White House says it won't be distracted by pranks of past tenants

After respite, California power supply close to running on empty

McCain, Lott agree 'in principle' on campaign finance reform schedule


4:30pm ET, 4/16











CNN Websites
Networks image

Stephen Hess: Even campaigners should follow etiquette


May 8, 2000
Web posted at: 4:13 p.m. EST (2013 GMT)

(CNN) -- The negative campaigning and fiery rhetoric in the presidential campaign have cooled in recent weeks, a civility Stephen Hess says everyone with a stake in politics and journalism should adhere to. His book "The Little Book of Campaign Etiquette: For Everyone with a Stake in Politicians and Journalists" (Brookings Institution) takes a look at political campaigning and political and journalistic etiquette.

Hess recently talked to CNN's Kyra Phillips from Washington on "CNN Sunday Morning."

CNN: I tell you, I love this book because it put me to the test as I was reading it last night. Now, you'll notice in the intro I left that word "rhetoric" in there on purpose and it's because I'm referring to your chapter on vocabulary and you mention the impact of just one word, whether it's a politician or a journalist, and why use "rhetoric"? Why not use "dialogue"?

HESS: Well, I think, by the way, dialogue is what we're after. We expect a candidate to deconstruct the position papers or the policies of his opponent. Everything shouldn't be about how wonderful they are. We want to know what they think about how awful the other side is. When you step over the line you've got to be awful careful. For example, I'm a little worried in the last week about Vice President Gore. I think he's absolutely on target to attack George W. Bush's position, but then you listen to the words and he's saying they're reckless, irresponsible, smug.


Now, are these really words that we associate with policy or are they words that we associate with character? Isn't there a subliminal message that he's saying well, it's really George Bush that's smug, not his policies?

So I think that's the sort of thing we need to examine as we get more and more into this campaign year.

CNN: So what's your rule of etiquette for politicians?

HESS: Well, words have consequences, no question about that, and they must consider that.

CNN: Another great chapter, "Bias." Do you think a majority of Americans think the press is of liberal bias and what's your rule of etiquette?

HESS: Well, I'd have to look up my rule but the...

CNN: I'll do that for you. Go ahead.

HESS: I should say -- OK. What the book is, for those that haven't read it, is 41 little essays. I hope they're sort of entertaining. And they're alphabetical from "A is for advertising" to "B is for bias" to "C is for conflict of interest" to "D is debate" and so forth.

I think on the question of bias, people think that things that don't agree with their stated position are therefore biased. So let's say they pick up a paper and they're reading a story about the IRA or they're reading a story about abortion or they're reading a story about Palestinians, something that they feel strongly about, and if the story doesn't conform to their views, then therefore it's biased.

So I think sometimes the press gets a bad rap on that.

CNN: And your rule of etiquette, "Reporters should practice leaning," meaning when covering a campaign they deliberately lean a little against the candidate they might be inclined to favor?

HESS: Yeah, that's something I borrowed from some great political reporters of the past, Alan Otten of the Wall Street Journal and then David Broder of the Washington Post. It's the way they do it. Everybody has feelings. No two candidates do they view exactly the same, and when they see that one is more in line with their thinking, lean a little against that one and you'll come out about right.

CNN: OK, we've got to hit on this one, Stephen, before we rap up, "Lying." You address lying for journalists and politicians. Please give us the rule of etiquette here. Is lying that bad?

HESS: Well, you know about a hyperbole. We expect them maybe to go a little gloriously in their rhetoric. If it's a misstatement that shouldn't be on the front page of their local newspaper, they've probably gone too far. But I divide lying into honest lying -- inadvertent lying, that sort of thing -- and then, of course, damn lies. It's the damn lies we'd better worry about.

CNN: What about journalists who may sort of, you know, the lie may be important for a bigger social cause? Investigative reporting, prime example.

HESS: Well, I get a little worried about that. For instance, I happen to be very much against hidden cameras. I think journalists should be able to get what they need without doing things that break the law. And that's the law as applied to them. The First Amendment does not protect reporters breaking the law and that seems to be a quite clear constitutional principle.

GOP Power Couple Tumbles Off A-List
July 20, 1997

Brookings Institution
   Biography: Stephen Hess
Brookings Institution Press

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.


Back to the top  © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.