|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sub skipper's lawyer disputes Navy report
HONOLULU, Hawaii -- The admiral who led the Navy's initial probe into the collision between the USS Greeneville and a Japanese teaching vessel said on cross-examination that at least one of his assumptions about the incident might not have been correct.
Rear Adm. Charles Griffiths Jr. Wednesday listed five main factors: A rush to complete an emergency surfacing drill, which was pushed back nearly 45 minutes because of delays including a long lunch for civilian guests. A lack of qualified sonar operators. Broken equipment that could have helped detect the Japanese ship. The number and location of 16 civilians aboard the Greeneville. A command climate in which crew members were unaccustomed to questioning Waddle because they trusted his skills. During the emergency surfacing maneuver on February 9, the nuclear-powered submarine hit and sank the Ehime Maru. Twenty-six people were rescued, but nine people, including four teen-agers, remain missing and presumed dead. Rushed maneuver questionedGriffiths acknowledged Wednesday under cross-examination that Cmdr. Scott Waddle might already have decided to return to port late and made arrangements to do so, which would challenge Griffiths' assumption that the crew cut corners to catch up to its schedule. "My logical connection to being generally behind schedule and trying to catch up was my assumption," he said. "Maybe that's not the case." "If your assumption is wrong," Waddle's civilian attorney, Charles Gittins, noted, "that places the commanding officer's action in a different light." Griffiths also backed off his testimony that a senior officer visiting the Greeneville, Capt. Robert Brandhuber, thought Waddle was moving too fast to prepare for the drill. He said a better characterization was the commander was doing things more quickly than Brandhuber would have. Griffiths said Brandhuber didn't necessarily consider what Waddle was doing unsafe. Gittins challenged the Navy's preliminary investigation into the accident as incomplete and inaccurate. "You had some time constraints placed on you that made it difficult ... to do a thorough and complete investigation," Gittins said to the admiral during his third day on the witness stand. Griffiths also acknowledged on cross examination that the submarine's fire control technician knew the Ehime Maru was within close range of the Greeneville and never told the commander. "He made no report," Griffiths said. "No report whatsoever?" asked Gittins. "Whatsoever," the investigator replied. The technician, who analyzes sonar data, said he didn't report the presence of the ship to Waddle because the visiting civilians blocked his access to the commander. Waddle could testifyThe court of inquiry will help determine the fate of Waddle, 41, executive officer Lt. Cmdr. Gerald Pfeifer, 38, and Lt. j.g. Michael Coen, 26, the officer of the deck at the time of the collision. They could face courts-martial. The inquiry is expected to last several weeks. Whether Waddle testifies depends on whether he's offered testimonial immunity. Under testimonial immunity, Waddle's testimony could not be used against him in possible court-martial procedures. His lawyer indicated Tuesday Waddle would not testify, because the Navy had deferred a decision about the immunity and Gittins interpreted that as a negative response. But the Navy says it is considering the request, so the possibility of Waddle taking the stand is still on the table. CNN Correspondent Gary Tuchman and The Associated Press contributed to this report. RELATED STORIES: Commander of USS Greeneville will not testify RELATED SITES:
U.S. Coast Guard |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back to the top |
© 2003 Cable News Network LP, LLLP.
A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us. |