Greenfield: Real questions for Alito
By Jeff Greenfield
So, how about it, judge? Paul, John or Ringo? Beer or wine? Halle Berry or Diane Lane?
YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- OK, one day of nomination hearings are enough. Clearly, we're not going to learn anything remotely useful about the legal philosophy of Judge Samuel Alito.
Democrats are spending their time painting the judge as a jurist who chuckles with amusement as jackbooted thugs strip-search innocent children and eject impoverished miners from their homes, all the while ripping giant holes in the Constitution.
Republicans are grasping Alito by the hand, leading him through gentle reassurances of his wisdom and probity. ("And didn't you always in every way act with total and complete integrity?")
And when the questions turn to matters of law or constitutional interpretation, Alito permits himself explosively shocking opinions: when the Supreme Court decides something, it's a precedent (duh!), or: "No one is above the law; no one is under the law." (Is anybody beside the law? Never mind.)
So, are there questions that might, in fact, throw some light on what Alito (or any other nominee, by the way) might think without the usual rhetorical wanderings that pass for senators' "questions?"
I'm glad you asked. In fact, there are two kinds of questions.
The first kind asks for answers that offer a sense of a nominee's thinking without committing that nominee to any future rulings. For instance:
The second type of questions would give us a much broader sense of how a nominee thinks. For instance:
Not only would these lines of questioning be far more revealing than the ones we've been listening to, they'd surely garner a much bigger audience.
|© 2007 Cable News Network LP, LLLP.
A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us. Site Map.