Skip to main content
  • E-mail
  • Save
  • Print

Robots tricked by optical illusions

  • Story Highlights
  • Illusions are a consequence of evolving useful behavior in a complex world
  • Researchers trained the virtual robots to predict the reflectance of surfaces
  • Study suggests the first biologically-based definition of what an illusion is
  • Next Article in Technology »
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font

LONDON, England (CNN) -- Researchers at University College London (UCL) are helping to explain why humans see illusions.

art.fs.virtualrobots.jpg

The UCL Institute of Ophthalmology's synthetic "dead leaves" image. Artificial neural networks were trained to recognize surfaces within these images, but they exhibited responses commensurate with human lightness illusions.

In a study conducted at the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology virtual robots were trained to 'see' correctly. But during the course of the experiment they made the same visual mistakes that we do.

The findings are published in the latest edition of the journal PLoS Computational Biology in a paper titled: "What Are Lightness Illusions and Why Do We See Them".

The results reveal that illusions are an inevitable consequence of evolving useful behavior in a complex world.

Defined by The Oxford English Dictionary an illusion is "something that deceives or deludes by producing a false impression."

Visual illusions, such as the 'Hermann Grid Illusion', or White's Illusion trick the viewer into misinterpreting shades of gray.

To address the question of why humans see illusions, researchers at the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology used artificial neural networks -- effectively virtual toy robots with miniature virtual brains -- to model, not human vision, but human visual ecology.

Dr David Corney -- a member of Dr. Lotto's laboratory team -- trained the virtual robots to predict the reflectance (shades of gray) of surfaces in different 3D scenes not unlike those found in nature.

Although the robots could interpret most of the scenes effectively, and differentiate between surfaces correctly, they also exhibited the same lightness illusions that humans see.

The study's senior author, Dr. Beau Lotto from the Institute of Ophthalmology at UCL explained: "Lightness illusions have been the focus of scientists, philosophers and artists interested in how the mind works for centuries. And yet why we see them is still unclear."

"Sometimes the best way to understand how the visual brain works is to understand why sometimes it does not."

"In short, they not only get it right like we do," Dr Lotto said, "But they also get it wrong like we do too. This provides causal evidence that illusions represent not the world as it is, but what proved useful to see in one's past interactions with the sources of retinal images."

"The virtual robots in this study were driven solely by the statistics of their training history and used these statistics as the basis of their correct and subsequent incorrect decisions. Similarly, we believe the human brain generates perceptions of the world in the same way, by encoding the statistical relationships between images and scenes in our past visual experience and uses this as the basis for behaving usefully and consistently towards the sources of visual images."

Although the artificial neural networks used in the research are much less complex than the human visual system, this simplicity helped the researchers to identify and further understand what they believe is a fundamental principle behind why we see illusion: the statistics of our past visual experiences.

As the brain does not have direct contact with the world, but only an image of the world on the retina which is ambiguous, it has to call on the statistics of how it behaved in the past to understand how to behave in the future.

Dr Corney said: "Every scene is ambiguous, to us, to animals and to robots. Our eyes and brains have evolved to let us behave effectively and so survive. So when presented with any image of the world, what we see is what would have been useful to see in the past. Illusions are uncommon and so misinterpreting an image rarely matters."

Dr. Lotto added: "The study also suggests the first biologically-based definition of what an illusion is: the condition in which the actual source of a stimulus differs from its most likely source. When we see an illusion we are seeing the most likely source of the image given history."

"Visual illusions have been central to the science and philosophy of human consciousness for centuries and this research demonstrates that how we respond to them can give vital information about the processes behind vision." E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend

  • E-mail
  • Save
  • Print
Today's Featured Product:
2011 BMW Z4 sDrive35is
 8.0 out of 10
Recent Product Reviews:
RIM BlackBerry Torch 9800 (AT&T)
 8.0 out of 10
Motorola Rambler - black (Boost Mobile)
 7.0 out of 10
Samsung UN46C6500
 6.9 out of 10