Skip to main content

Air Force cutting off access to WikiLeaks news

By the CNN Wire Staff
The New York Times website is one of three newspaper websites that the Air Force is blocking.
The New York Times website is one of three newspaper websites that the Air Force is blocking.
  • NEW: Toobin: "This seems like a rather pointless protest"
  • The U.S. Air Force says news outlets working with WikiLeaks have been blocked
  • The list is reviewed "on a daily basis," an Air Force spokeswoman says
  • The White House already has ordered federal employees not to look at leaked documents

(CNN) -- The U.S. Air Force is denying its personnel access to websites carrying documents released by WikiLeaks, including those of some news organizations, a spokeswoman said Tuesday.

The White House Office of Management and Budget has already forbidden federal employees and contractors from accessing classified documents publicly available on WikiLeaks and other websites via computers or mobile devices. But Maj. Toni Tones said the Air Force has cut off access to over 25 sites, including WikiLeaks and three newspapers that have worked with the site to release a cache of U.S. diplomatic cables -- The New York Times, The Guardian in Britain and Germany's Der Spiegel.

"This is consistent with the direction received in August 2010 that stated Air Force personnel should not access the WikiLeaks website to view or download the classified information," Tones told CNN.

The other sites may not necessarily be WikiLeaks-related, Tones said but she couldn't explain what other sites were blocked and why. "We look at these sites on a daily basis routinely," so the number changes day by day, she said.

Rallies for, against WikiLeaks suspect
Who is the intelligence leak suspect?

The government -- particularly the State and Defense Departments, whose documents have made up the lion's share of the WikiLeak leaks -- has been reviewing security as it pertains to accessing documents on its secret servers, with an eye toward preventing unauthorized leaks.

But some see no logic in barring access to documents that are now, like it not, publicly accessible.

"This seems like a rather pointless protest," said CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin. "Our enemies can see the documents, but not those whom we trust to defend our country."

WikiLeaks, which facilitates the disclosure of secret information, began releasing a cache of more than 250,000 U.S. diplomatic cables from around the world in November. The site previously released hundreds of thousands of military documents from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A U.S. Army intelligence specialist, Pfc. Bradley Manning, is suspected of releasing the documents to WikiLeaks. Manning is currently awaiting trial on charges of illegally downloading classified material and providing video of a 2007 helicopter attack in Iraq to WikiLeaks.

Part of complete coverage on
What next for Julian Assange?
What next for WikiLeaks editor and founder Julian Assange, now that he's been released on bail in the UK?
Assange condemns investigations
Julian Assange says the sexual misconduct charges against him are little more than an effort to discredit him and his organization.
Assange released on bail
WikiLeaks editor walks out of London court after being freed on bail nine days after being arrested for questioning about alleged sex crimes in Sweden.
Assange's apparent online dating life
In 2006, Julian Assange was apparently looking for a date. After launching WikiLeaks, he evidently created a profile on
Assange finds celebrity support
A court in London found itself in the world's spotlight, as a small army of celebrities turned up to offer support -- and bail money -- to Julian Assange.
WikiLeaks rival set to launch
The founders of say they are former WikiLeaks members unhappy with the way the organization is being run under Julian Assange. attack planned
Hackers who support WikiLeaks want others to replicate the attacks they say took down the websites of MasterCard and Visa.
Expert: 'Poison pill' can't be stopped
Does Julian Assange's threat to release "Doomsday Files" from Wikileaks carry validity?