Skip to main content
Part of complete coverage on

Disgraced surgeon loses manslaughter appeal

By Bill Wunner, CNN
Jayant Patel arrives for court in June 2010 with his wife at his side.
Jayant Patel arrives for court in June 2010 with his wife at his side.
  • Jayant Patel convicted of three counts of manslaughter, one of grievous bodily harm
  • Charges relate to patients the surgeon treated at Bundaberg Base Hospital in Queensland
  • Court concluded the disgraced doctor is unlikely ever to work again as a surgeon

(CNN) -- Disgraced American surgeon Jayant Patel will serve out a seven-year prison term in Australia, after a Brisbane court on Thursday dismissed his appeals against his manslaughter convictions and sentence.

In June 2010, the former director of surgery at the Bundaberg Base Hospital was convicted in connection with the deaths of three patients, and of causing grievous bodily harm to a fourth.

The convictions came five years after the end of Patel's tumultuous two-year stint in Bundaberg.

Two of Patel's manslaughter convictions involved failed esophagectomies. A third concerned a patient who died after his sigmoid colon was removed.

The grievous bodily harm charge involved a patient who was told he likely had cancer, but did not. Patel removed his large bowel in an operation that the judge in the case later called "pointless."

"He was very sure of himself... always talking himself up," remembered nurse Toni Hoffman, who worked alongside Patel. Yet, "the things that he was saying about himself - as we were seeing patients come through with all of these complications, and patients that ultimately died, that were in his care - just didn't ring true."

They called him 'Dr. Death'
The making of a bad surgeon

One co-worker dubbed him "Dr. Death," a label that was later popularized by the press.

More background and video from CNN's 'World's Untold Story' team

In all, Patel was the subject of more than 20 complaints brought by patients and co-workers. Ultimately, a government-appointed commission of inquiry concluded that his "poor level of care contributed to, or may have contributed to" at least 17 deaths and 31 injuries.

What his colleagues and patients in Bundaberg didn't know, was that he had been disciplined for negligence and for making surgical errors while practicing in Portland, Oregon several years earlier.

When interviewing for the job in Bundaberg, Patel didn't disclose his disciplinary history, and Australian authorities who vetted his credentials did not discover it until after Patel had left his job two years later.

Patel still faces several charges of fraud, for allegedly concealing his disciplinary past.

In dismissing Patel's appeal against what his attorneys had called a "manifestly excessive" sentence Thursday, the appeals court also dismissed the prosecutor's call for him to serve even more time behind bars.

The sentence was appropriate, the court concluded, in order "to make it clear that the community, acting through the courts, denounced his conduct." A longer sentence would serve little purpose, the court decided, as Patel's "professional career is in tatters. His reputation has been destroyed. He is now 60 years old and is unlikely to ever work again as a surgeon."

And that's punishment enough, according to many former patients and their relatives. Even before the appeals court handed down its decision, some of those most affected by Patel's actions said they were unconcerned about the outcome.

Beryl Crosby, who headed a support group for former Patel patients, said while some initially weren't satisfied with the seven-year sentence, "others are quite okay with that. It was just that he was charged, and that the jury found him guilty -- that alone was what most patients needed."

"He can't do it to anybody else, and that's all I want," said Judy Kemps, the widow of one of Patel's patients. "It's all behind me... I'm moving on with my life, and whatever happens to him, I don't care."

Patel's lawyers are considering taking his case to the High Court.