Skip to main content

Stop beating the drums of war against Iran

By Asher Kaufman, Special to CNN
March 9, 2012 -- Updated 2205 GMT (0605 HKT)
An Iranian clergyman in the courtyard of Massoumeh shrine in Qom, close to a nuclear facility.
An Iranian clergyman in the courtyard of Massoumeh shrine in Qom, close to a nuclear facility.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • President Obama said the GOP are "beating the drums of war" about attacking Iran
  • Asher Kaufman: A military strike against Iran would unleash a devastating war
  • He says Israel would be far more vulnerable in such a war than Iran
  • Kaufman: We should consider how to rebalance Middle East inter-state politics

Editor's note: Asher Kaufman is associate professor of history and peace studies at the University of Notre Dame's Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies. He is the author of "Reviving Phoenicia: The Search for Identity in Lebanon."

(CNN) -- President Barack Obama's rebuke of Republicans who are "beating the drums of war" in encouraging the United States to take military action against Iran should be targeted not just toward those critics but also, and more important, toward the Israeli government.

An attack on Iran would not only fail to achieve its stated goal of denuclearizing the country, it would unleash a devastating confrontation between Iran and Israel that would harm thousands of Israelis and Iranians, and affect those in neighboring states.

It would drag the U.S. into another Middle East quagmire, and it would launch an oil crisis that would throw the global economy into turmoil. Then, once the dust settles (or before it does), Iran would only be more motivated to pursue its nuclear ambition.

Asher Kaufman
Asher Kaufman

Four scenarios on Iran's nuclear plan

In the current environment of heated rhetoric from all sides, there is too much focus on when and if Israel would launch a preemptive strike against Iran. What's missing in the talks are the chance of success in stopping Iran's nuclear plan through a military option and the regional and global consequences of a new war.

Given the territorial distribution of Iran's nuclear facilities and the likelihood that Iran has readied them for possible attacks, Israel probably does not have the military capacity to eliminate, or even seriously damage, Iran's alleged nuclear program.

Some experts have compared Israel's airstrikes against nuclear facilities in Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007 with a possible strike against Iran. But this is a flawed analogy. In those cases, Israel launched surprise attacks against one facility, which would not be the case with Iran. Moreover, Iran and Israel both possess extensive arsenals of missiles. There is little doubt that a strike would trigger an unprecedented war in the Middle East. Israel would be far more vulnerable in such a war than Iran, due to its small size and the fact that the country's epicenter is in one single region, the greater Tel Aviv area.

Although Iran has come under immense international pressure to halt its nuclear plan, it has refused to do so. However, Iran, unlike its reputation in the West and in Israel in particular, is a rational country with rational leadership, which seeks to enhance its regional and global power. Iran is not suicidal. Therefore, comparing Iran with Nazi Germany, as is often done by Israeli leadership, is historically problematic and extremely dangerous politically.

Unfortunately, given the track record of engaging with Iran, perhaps in the long term we may have to learn to live with a nuclearized Middle East that would operate based on the Cold War dynamics of mutually assured destruction. A nuclearized Iran might even launch a nuclear arms race involving other regional players such as Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The only alternative to this pessimistic forecast is to reconsider Middle East inter-state politics, the Arab-Israeli conflict and U.S. policy in the region.

Constructive communication should be encouraged between the Iranian leadership and the U.S., and it should involve other key players. The U.S. should acknowledge the importance of having strong regional players in the Middle East, including Iran. If the regional inter-state dynamics can be changed for the better, Iran may be forced to rethink its strategy, including its nuclear ambition. A rebalanced Middle East will also need the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to be resolved sooner rather than later, since that has been a source of continuous friction.

Regrettably, with Israel, Iran and the U.S. entrenched in their positions, it does not look like we are heading in a direction that would solve the Iran problem anytime soon.

Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion

Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Asher Kaufman.

ADVERTISEMENT
Part of complete coverage on
Iran: Mounting tensions
April 13, 2012 -- Updated 1303 GMT (2103 HKT)
Two months ago, Emad Ghavidel turned on the television in Tehran and saw graphic footage of an injured Syrian child crying out in pain.
March 9, 2012 -- Updated 1438 GMT (2238 HKT)
Iran's biggest customers are responding to increasing pressure to cut imports from Tehran.
March 8, 2012 -- Updated 2244 GMT (0644 HKT)
Faced with mounting pressure from world powers over its controversial nuclear program, Iran's ambassador to the IAEA says this country "is ready to re-engage with (the) IAEA."
March 6, 2012 -- Updated 2152 GMT (0552 HKT)
Republican presidential hopefuls and U.S. President Barack Obama trade barbs over Iran.
March 9, 2012 -- Updated 1456 GMT (2256 HKT)
Why is the international community suspicious of Iran's nuclear program? CNN's Hala Gorani reports.
March 9, 2012 -- Updated 2205 GMT (0605 HKT)
President Barack Obama's rebuke of Republicans who are "beating the drums of war" for military action against Iran should also be directed at Israel, Asher Kaufman says.
March 8, 2012 -- Updated 1751 GMT (0151 HKT)
Opinion: The only way war with Iran may be avoided is if the country believes an attack from the West is a real possibility, Frida Ghitis says.
March 19, 2012 -- Updated 1330 GMT (2130 HKT)
Iran's controversial nuclear program began more than 50 years ago with aid from the West.
March 8, 2012 -- Updated 1639 GMT (0039 HKT)
(file photo) Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has criticized Barack Obama's threat to impose more sanctions on Iran.
Recent remarks by U.S. President Barack Obama that he is not thinking of military action against Iran are positive, according to Iran's supreme leader, Iran's state-run Press TV reported.
March 5, 2012 -- Updated 2231 GMT (0631 HKT)
CNN's Matthew Chance reports U.N. inspectors have "credible information" that Iran may be developing a nuclear device.
March 6, 2012 -- Updated 1931 GMT (0331 HKT)
LZ Granderson looks at the effect of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his nuclear weapons "game."
March 9, 2012 -- Updated 1622 GMT (0022 HKT)
A threatened Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear program carries enormous risks for the Jewish state, including international isolation, retaliation at home and abroad, and steep economic costs.
March 6, 2012 -- Updated 2036 GMT (0436 HKT)
Erin Burnett breaks down the mixed messages between Israel and the U.S. on Iran.
March 6, 2012 -- Updated 1834 GMT (0234 HKT)
Israeli President Shimon Peres discusses his concerns about Iran.
ADVERTISEMENT