Skip to main content

Can cease-fire between Israel and Hamas result in real change?

By Marco Vicenzino, Special to CNN
November 22, 2012 -- Updated 1425 GMT (2225 HKT)
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Marco Vicenzino says Gaza conflict marks a clear wake-up call to both sides
  • Vicenzino: The regional status quo is simply unsustainable in the long term
  • Vicenzino: Best outcome for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was cease-fire
  • Vicenzino: Egypt's Morsy must prove able to restrain Hamas when necessary

Editor's note: Marco Vicenzino writes about geopolitical risk analysis for global media outlets and is director of the Global Strategy Project, a geopolitical research and analysis organization based in Washington.

(CNN) -- The brief but bloody Gaza conflict between Israel and Hamas marks a clear wake-up call to both sides, and their supporters, on the indispensable need to start serious talks beyond the new cease-fire.

This development must be seized upon to convert the recent crisis into an opportunity after years of inaction. A desperate injection of diplomatic energy is required. The alternative is renouncing responsibility and initiative to continuous unpredictability, and becoming its hostage. In an increasingly volatile region experiencing historic transformation and shifting alliances, the potential for simultaneous conflict on multiple fronts remains real.

Are you affected by the conflict? Share photos and video, but stay safe.

Diminishing the threat, and its catastrophic consequences, through a credible process is critical to regional stability and international order.

Marco Vicenzino
Marco Vicenzino

The cease-fire alone simply marks the end of another chapter in the decades-old vicious cycle of violence between Israelis and Palestinians. Ideally, a next phase of negotiations should focus on a permanent end of hostilities. Although its duration would be unknown, it is best to commence sooner rather than later.

Map: Israel  Map: Israel
Map: IsraelMap: Israel
Israel reacts to cease-fire
Egypt's role in Israel-Gaza cease-fire
PLO reaction to cease-fire
Nervous calm in Israel after cease-fire

The regional status quo is simply unsustainable in the long-term. Time is of the essence. A continuing game of brinksmanship risks miscalculation and another descent into the abyss at any given moment. After all, there is no military solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conundrum.

Tallying the results of the recent conflict leaves adequate room for each side to claim points and some form of victory. However, neither could benefit from further escalation. For Israel, its Iron Dome anti-missile defense system proved increasingly effective. Its surgical strikes in Gaza demonstrated greater accuracy.

Although no match for Israel's superior firepower, Hamas's rockets reached alarmingly deeper into Israeli territory. This provided a psychological boost to morale despite relentless Israeli attacks and considerable physical damage.

Post-conflict reconstruction is nothing new: Hamas will emerge politically strengthened at home and abroad and it will continue to overshadow Fatah, which controls the West Bank. The credibility of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is further undermined, even as he actively pursues non-member observer status for Palestinians at the United Nations.

The presence of intermediaries in Cairo to negotiate the cease-fire reaffirms the centrality of Egypt's role to any peace process. Clearly, without Egypt, no solutions are possible. For now, the cease-fire also marks the most important foreign policy test and achievement yet for new Egyptian President Mohamed Morsy.

Since Hosni Mubarak's ouster and its departure from Syria, Hamas remains increasingly dependent upon Egypt ideologically, politically, diplomatically and economically. Throughout the week-long conflict, Morsy skilfully influenced Hamas. Furthermore, sending Egypt's prime minister to Gaza at the very start of the crisis proved symbolically important, although practically ineffective.

Through the cease-fire, Morsy has raised his standing at home and abroad. A process of establishing himself as a reliable regional broker has begun. However, responsible continuity and critical follow up is required.

Statements alone will not suffice. In concrete terms, he must prove able to restrain Hamas when necessary and guide it on a constructive path toward peace. Sustained diplomatic support from the Arab League and Turkey, and particularly financial assistance from Qatar, will further strengthen Morsy's hand.

The increased leverage from positive crisis management must be used effectively by Morsy at home. While he is developing a pragmatic accommodation with the military, serious concerns still linger for political opponents and minorities of his broader agenda. Morsy must reach out beyond his political base and take a more inclusive approach.

The crisis also underscored the need to strike a balance between public expectations, particularly in Islamist ranks, and what is realistically achievable in the diplomatic realm. While in opposition during the Mubarak era, Islamists scored easy points with public opinion when condemning government inaction during Israeli-Palestinian violence.

Now the reality of power demands greater rhetorical responsibility and restraint from Islamists in government.

The current cease-fire also offers President Morsy the opportunity for renewed, and closer, engagement with the U.S., particularly after President Barack Obama's election victory and Morsy's initial blunders following the killing of America's ambassador to Libya.

With the U.S. election over, the burden is also on President Obama to assume a more proactive role in fostering a productive peace process, in collaboration with allies and regional powers. Obama's first attempt immediately following his 2009 inauguration ended in humiliation at the hands of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Although once bitten, Obama cannot be twice shy. American national interests and international order cannot afford it.

With a drastically transforming Middle East and in search for a foreign policy legacy, Obama must seize the historic opportunity for a new start. There is no room for reluctance or excessive caution. Troubles with Iran and Syria cannot be obstacles to a Palestinian state.

Furthermore, the growing perception of exclusive American interest in east Asia and neglect and indifference to the Middle East is very destabilizing.

It creates an increasingly dangerous power vacuum and encourages nefarious forces to fill it. Obama's penchant for re-start buttons should not lose focus on the Middle East, and particularly Egypt.

Approximately two months away from election, the cease-fire was the best possible outcome for Israel's Netanyahu. He emerges politically stronger and brandishes his leadership credentials as the guarantor of Israel's security. Averting a ground invasion was crucial. He exits the crisis with ample support in the West and avoided greater international isolation.

However, the regional game has dramatically changed for all players. Netanyahu no longer enjoys Mubarak's passive acquiescence in Egypt or a reliably predictable enemy like President Bashar al-Assad in Syria. New realities require new approaches. Failure to adapt will have considerable consequences for Netanyahu and Israel.

Ultimately, a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian issue is not a panacea to the ills plaguing the broader Middle East. However, it would provide indispensable momentum and unleash new dynamics in confronting other outstanding grievances around the region and beyond.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Marco Vicenzino.

ADVERTISEMENT
Part of complete coverage on
Israel-Gaza conflict
Are you in the region? Share photos and video of what you are witnessing, but please do not expose yourself or others to a dangerous situation.
Follow CNNArabic for the latest news and analysis from the Middle East and rest of the world.
November 24, 2012 -- Updated 2025 GMT (0425 HKT)
As the dust settles over Gaza and Israel amid relative calm, analysts consider who were the winners and losers from the conflict.
November 23, 2012 -- Updated 1240 GMT (2040 HKT)
Palestinian Authority leaders renewed calls for unity with their Hamas-led rivals after the latest Israel-Gaza conflict, but the fighting may have left Hamas with the upper hand.
The relentless pace of the Israeli airstrike on Gaza gave the country's military time to make a significant dent in the offensive capability of Hamas, the Israeli military said.
November 22, 2012 -- Updated 1425 GMT (2225 HKT)
The brief but bloody Gaza conflict marks a clear wake-up call to both sides on the need to start serious talks beyond the new cease-fire.
November 22, 2012 -- Updated 1425 GMT (2225 HKT)
However crude the calculation, the winners and losers in the Israel-Gaza conflict are already reshaping political alliances in the Middle East.
November 22, 2012 -- Updated 1428 GMT (2228 HKT)
In the background of the drama playing out in Gaza and southern Israel, an election looms. On January 22, Israelis will go to the polls.
November 26, 2012 -- Updated 1136 GMT (1936 HKT)
Four-year-old Yosef lies in a hospital bed with curiosity gleaming in his eyes as he listens to a family friend tell him the age-old story of Jonah and the whale.
November 22, 2012 -- Updated 1958 GMT (0358 HKT)
Egyptian President Mohamed Morsy has won praise for his effort to bring about a cease-fire highlight the delicate balancing act he faces.
-- Updated GMT ( HKT)
Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas have been engaged in a bitter, decades-long conflict over Gaza.
November 24, 2012 -- Updated 1855 GMT (0255 HKT)
What is the group, where did it come from and what does it hope to achieve by its rocket attacks on Israeli targets? CNN explains.
ADVERTISEMENT