Two different marriage bans, both wrong
June 12, 2013 -- Updated 1148 GMT (1948 HKT)
A same-sex couple exchange wedding rings at their marriage ceremony.
- 46 years ago, the Supreme Court struck down a ban on interracial marriage
- Donna Brazile: Supreme Court can knock down another unconstitutional barrier
- Court must rule gays, lesbians are entitled to same rights as everyone else, she says
- Brazile: Justices can stand up for equality by striking down bans on same sex marriage
Editor's note: Donna Brazile, a CNN contributor and a Democratic strategist, is vice chairwoman for voter registration and participation at the Democratic National Committee. She is a nationally syndicated columnist, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University and author of "Cooking with Grease: Stirring the Pot in America." She was manager for the Gore-Lieberman presidential campaign in 2000.
(CNN) -- Today is the 46th anniversary of Loving v. Virginia, the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that declared unconstitutional any ban on interracial marriage. More than four decades after the historic and aptly named Loving decision, the U.S. Supreme Court is once again poised to rule in a case that could put an end to discriminatory bans prohibiting marriage, this time for gay and lesbian couples.
This month, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule in a decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry, a case brought by two California couples challenging the constitutionality of the state's ban on same sex marriages, commonly called Prop 8. Attorneys Ted Olson and David Boies -- a Republican and Democrat best known for battling each other before the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore -- have teamed up and taken the Perry case beyond California.
Supreme Court looks at same-sex marriage
Isn't France liberal on sexual issues?
Olson and Boies argued before the justices that the Supreme Court has the obligation under the Constitution to strike down not just Prop 8, but all state laws banning marriage equality for gay and lesbian Americans. After all, they say, this is precisely how the court ruled in Loving -- and 13 other cases dating back to 1888 in which a majority of the justices stood up to protect the fundamental right of every American to marry the person he or she loves.
A broad ruling in the Perry case this month would be a historic step forward in affirming that gay Americans are entitled to the same rights and freedoms as everyone else. Although I firmly believe public opinion is irrelevant to the court's responsibility to ensure equality under the law, our nation is clearly ready to embrace marriage equality.
When the Supreme Court struck down interracial marriage bans in 1967, a Gallup poll found that only 20% of Americans approved of such marriages. But the court fulfilled its duty to protect individual rights without regard to what was popular.
Today, we have already have evolved much further on marriage equality. A growing bipartisan majority of voters -- 58% -- support marriage rights for same-sex couples.
When Richard Loving told his lawyer to "tell the court I love my wife," he could not have known that his words would still be applicable 46 years later in the very same courtroom. There is never a wrong time to stand up for justice and equality, but the time has never been more right to stand up for gay rights than in the Perry case.
As the Supreme Court weighs equality for gay and lesbian couples, the anniversary of Loving provides a timely reminder of a new legacy they could write for the history books.
Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion.
Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion.
The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Donna Brazile.
Part of complete coverage on
December 4, 2013 -- Updated 2343 GMT (0743 HKT)
Matthew Fraser says racism is a sensitive issue in France, and Bob Dylan's comments have touched a raw nerve.
December 3, 2013 -- Updated 2255 GMT (0655 HKT)
Robert Ellsberg says Rush Limbaugh's remarks show no one is troubled by a pope who loves the poor until the pope dares to reflect on the causes of poverty
December 4, 2013 -- Updated 1801 GMT (0201 HKT)
Brian Donovan says we don't know what went through Paul Walker's mind in the moments leading up to his fiery end, but the crash may provide yet another example of speed's addictive power
December 3, 2013 -- Updated 2256 GMT (0656 HKT)
Kyle Ayers says it's OK to share conversations publicly as long as the people involved are kept anonymous.
December 4, 2013 -- Updated 1314 GMT (2114 HKT)
Ruben Navarrette says people criticizing Mitt Romney's son for tweeting a picture of himself after helping people in a car crash are petty haters slamming someone for a good deed
December 4, 2013 -- Updated 1404 GMT (2204 HKT)
Susan Nossel says it's not just interrnational relations that suffered from Edward Snowden's revelations. Some writers have begun censoring themselves out of fear.
December 3, 2013 -- Updated 2109 GMT (0509 HKT)
Kate Ascher says everyone laments the state of the U.S. rail system after a deadly New York train derailment. But high tech improvements won't make train travel safe as long as humans are in charge.
December 3, 2013 -- Updated 0153 GMT (0953 HKT)
Sanjay Gupta says whether the Affordable Health Care Act ends up improving health has a lot to do with whether Americans start making better personal decisions about eating, exercise and weight loss
December 2, 2013 -- Updated 1541 GMT (2341 HKT)
Richard Trumka and Christine Owens say that the minimum wage should be raised and indexed to inflation: Let's not allow America's lowest-wage workers to keep on falling further behind
December 2, 2013 -- Updated 1244 GMT (2044 HKT)
John O'Dell says it's wrong to question the viability of Tesla as a company because of recent incidents of fires
December 2, 2013 -- Updated 1951 GMT (0351 HKT)
David Frum says the U.S. must pay attention to Vladimir Putin and his cronies' attempts to resurrect the Soviet Union and control the Ukraine.
December 2, 2013 -- Updated 1255 GMT (2055 HKT)
Julian Zelizer says signature programs have to be validated by the next president for them to go down in history
December 1, 2013 -- Updated 1717 GMT (0117 HKT)
Bill Gates says the Global Fund, which matches the best tools to those who need them most, is one of the kindest--and smartest-- investments the world has ever made
November 30, 2013 -- Updated 1547 GMT (2347 HKT)
Dean Obeidallah: If we must be obsessed with social media, why not use it to draw focus to causes we care about?
December 3, 2013 -- Updated 1702 GMT (0102 HKT)
Wallis Annenberg says instead of focusing on need, philanthropists should focus on supporting people like CNN Heroes, who look at old problems in brand new ways
Today's five most popular stories