Skip to main content

Do hotel star ratings mean anything anymore?

By Claire Hu, for CNN
May 6, 2014 -- Updated 1625 GMT (0025 HKT)
Dubai's Burj Al Arab has been called the world's most luxurious hotel. But it's still only got five stars.
Dubai's Burj Al Arab has been called the world's most luxurious hotel. But it's still only got five stars.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Online reviews now compete with "legacy" star ratings for hotel guest attention
  • Online review sites claim legacy rating systems don't provide enough information
  • Legacy rating evaluators say theirs are the only true, objective rating systems

(CNN) -- Plush romantic beach holiday?

You go for a five-star place.

Budget city crash pad?

A two- or three-star joint.

Simple, right?

Not anymore.

For many travelers, user-generated online reviews have become the go-to source for information when booking hotels.

Down with love: World's least-romantic hotels

TripAdvisor says more than 150 million reviews and opinions are posted on its pages, with 2,800 new topics added every day to the site's forums.

Review sites such as Hotels.com, Bookings.com, Expedia and others mean travelers are awash with information about hotels.

Many sites use their own "star" or points-based rating systems based on user reviews.

So where does this leave legacy star ratings?

Do they have a future?

America's most amazing hotel pools

A picture is worth a thousand stars at places such as at Le Claire de la Plume, a small inn in the French village of Grignan.
A picture is worth a thousand stars at places such as at Le Claire de la Plume, a small inn in the French village of Grignan.

What do those ratings actually mean?

Legacy rating systems are meant to provide an accurate and objective assessment of accommodations.

Inspectors with no vested interest in the outcome of ratings judge hotels and other accommodations according to established criteria and guidelines.

In the UK, the Automobile Association (AA) maintains a "common standards for hotel and guest accommodation" based on a one-to-five star system, with 60 points of assessment in areas such as service, bedrooms and food.

Simon Numphud, head of hotel services at the AA, says the system guarantees balanced and unbiased reviews.

"Website ratings are based on personal opinion and individual guest experience, whereas AA inspections are carried out using a set of quality standards by a highly experienced inspector," he says.

The trouble is standardization.

Seoul hotels at war over dessert

Each country has different requirements for awarding stars -- a three-star rating in Baltimore, Maryland, is different from a three-star rating in Kerala, India.

This can make star-rating systems confusing, according to Zoe Chan of Hotels.com.

"There is no universal star rating system," says Chan. "Each country has its own and in some cases more than one," leading to a "possible disparity of standards and facilities in different countries."

"You can't really compare a three-star hotel in the United States to a three-star hotel in Europe," agrees Christopher Elliott, author of "How to be the World's Smartest Traveler."

"In some countries, official star ratings can be a reliable guide to a hotel's amenities.

"But most ratings systems are poorly or completely unregulated, rendering them almost completely worthless."

Elliott adds that in many places ratings are manipulated by clever reputation management operatives, and can't be trusted.

A unified global rating system has been proposed by the World Hotel Rating Project, but so far nothing has gotten off the ground.

Which luxury hotel brand is the world's most popular?

Five-star definitions in Europe, United States, India

In 15 European countries, including Germany, Austria and Sweden, which have a harmonized hotel-ranking system, a five-star hotel room must include a personalized greeting with flowers or a gift and a one-hour ironing service as part of the room rate.

In the United States, where the American Automobile Association (AAA) runs its well-known diamond hotel ranking system, a five-diamond hotel will offer turndown service, personalized wake-up call and the "ultimate in luxury and sophistication" and "extraordinary physical attributes."

In the UK, where ratings are run by tourist boards and the AA, five-star hotels should offer a range of undefined "extra" facilities as well as multilingual service. Guests should be greeted at the door.

15 quirky hotels around the world

India takes the minutiae of five-star nitpicking to a new level.

In addition to criteria including quality linens, Jacuzzi bathtubs and valet parking, the tourism ministry is rolling out new guidelines over the next few years.

These will include at least three hooks in each bathroom, a phone next to the toilet and a luminous LED wall clock with numerals at least three inches apart.

Though not obligatory, "modern, water-based post-toilet paper hygiene facilities" are strongly advised for five-star places.

The reputation of the star-rating system was diminished in China this year when some hotels voluntarily downgraded themselves from five to four stars after the government banned officials from staying at five-star properties.

In Dubai, the system has been further confused by the Burj Al Arab hotel.

The property is commonly referred to as "the world's only seven-star hotel," though the hotel's general manager, Heinrich Morio, told CNN in 2013 that the seven-star myth was likely started by an awestruck journalist and isn't a rating the hotel itself promotes.

Meet the boss of the world's most luxurious hotel

TripAdvisor now includes the AA star rating on its hotel listings for the UK, as well as user-generated review ratings.
TripAdvisor now includes the AA star rating on its hotel listings for the UK, as well as user-generated review ratings.

Online games

Internet reviews, of course, are also subject to manipulation.

In 2013, a businessman was exposed after he posted phony glowing reviews for an imaginary seafood restaurant in Devon, England, called Oscars.

Instead of finding a restaurant, eager would-be diners instead found an alleyway crammed with garbage bins when they followed directions to the fake restaurant posted online.

TripAdvisor was among the sites that fell victim to the hoax.

The man who created the phantom restaurant said he posted the reviews after a friend's hotel received a spate of criticism that he suspected was from a rival hotelier.

TripAdvisor has since launched anti-fraud tactics, such as posting warnings on venues with suspect reviews.

Conde Nast Traveler announces 2014 hotel "hot list"

Other sites are similarly vigilant.

"We only allow guests to post reviews to our site if they have booked a hotel on Hotels.com and have completed their stay," says Chan. "Once the stay is completed, Hotels.com sends the guest a link so they may write a review. No incentive is offered for this information."

TripAdvisor also now displays AA star ratings for UK accommodations, as well as user reviews, suggesting there's no such thing as too much information when it comes to choosing a hotel.

Star system not flexible enough for some

Even so, many users prefer the detail provided by user reviews, as opposed to the "cookie cutter" evaluations provided by star- or points-based rating systems that may encourage properties designed simply to hit all the points on an evaluator's checklist.

Meghan McEwan, who runs the guesthouse Honor & Folly in Detroit, and blogs about unusual places to stay on designtripper.com, believes star ratings cramp individuality.

"Travelers want more than stars, they want detailed information about the experience of staying somewhere," she says.

"People have learned that they can forgive a lack of certain star-driven amenities if a hotel or inn is luxurious, quirky or interesting -- fascinating innkeepers, breakfast cooked with ingredients from an on-site garden, a beautiful location, a library full of great books, a comfortable chair in front of a fireplace."

Boutique hotel finder Mr and Mrs Smith categorizes its properties not with stars but by "character, quality, style and the overall experience of staying there."

"Customers do respond to star ratings but (ratings systems) are becoming increasingly outdated," says James Lohan, co-founder of Mr and Mrs Smith.

"It's much more important that a hotel is unique and has personality, whether it's a boutique B&B in Berlin or a beach retreat in Bali."

For many travelers, that notion of personality is better communicated in reviews from fellow travelers than in rigid ratings systems that many don't understand in the first place.

Do you use official star ratings to select a hotel or rely more on online user reviews? Tell us below.

Claire Hu is a culture and travel journalist based in South Africa.

ADVERTISEMENT
Part of complete coverage on
September 2, 2014 -- Updated 1607 GMT (0007 HKT)
Scrap all those other bucket lists you've been compiling and start saving -- these memorable-for-a-lifetime trips don't come cheap, or easy.
August 28, 2014 -- Updated 0140 GMT (0940 HKT)
A squabble over a device that limits how far a seat can recline has brought inflight etiquette into the spotlight again.
August 29, 2014 -- Updated 1023 GMT (1823 HKT)
Thirst for victory competes with thirst for booze in event where competitors raise their glasses long before they cross the finish line.
August 28, 2014 -- Updated 0957 GMT (1757 HKT)
At these fun Los Angeles bars, the the drinks come with a chaser of kitsch.
August 28, 2014 -- Updated 2041 GMT (0441 HKT)
From dining next to massive predators to drinking atop a rock in the middle of the ocean, Africa boasts some of the most interesting places to eat.
August 28, 2014 -- Updated 0512 GMT (1312 HKT)
Just weeks after Bill HIllman, known as a veteran, expert bull runner, was badly gored in Pamplona, he's back at other smaller bull runnings in Spain, but walking with a cane.
August 28, 2014 -- Updated 1654 GMT (0054 HKT)
Don't like the country you live in? Why not create your own, as many people have done. We uncover the parallel world of "micronationalism."
August 19, 2014 -- Updated 1341 GMT (2141 HKT)
LUSAIL CITY, QATAR: In this handout illustration provided by Qatar 2022, the Qatar 2022 Bid Committee today unveiled detailed plans for the iconic Lusail Stadium. With a capacity in excess of 86,000 and surrounded by water, the stadium would host the World Cup Opening Match and Final if Qatar wins the rights to stage the 2022 FIFA World Cup. If Qatar is awarded the honour of staging the 2022 FIFA World Cup, construction of the Lusail Stadium will start in 2015 and be completed in 2019. It will retain its full capacity after 2022.
Grab a glimpse of the near future. Plans for the desert city of Lusail include man-made islands and a host arena for the 2022 FIFA World Cup.
August 27, 2014 -- Updated 0124 GMT (0924 HKT)
A CNN producer experiences China's poor on-time flight record firsthand as his plane takes off eight hours late.
August 26, 2014 -- Updated 0600 GMT (1400 HKT)
New Yorker Kerrin Rousset's exploration of Swiss city aims to lure cocoa fans over to the dark side.
August 25, 2014 -- Updated 2039 GMT (0439 HKT)
Some things are just better after dark. These experiences around the world prove it.
August 25, 2014 -- Updated 1559 GMT (2359 HKT)
Lebanon's winemakers are adopting new tactics to get their products noticed.
August 25, 2014 -- Updated 0626 GMT (1426 HKT)
the Teufelsberg or
Spooks have left their mark on a once-divided city still thought to be an espionage hotbed.
August 24, 2014 -- Updated 2206 GMT (0606 HKT)
nanjing, handicrafts
With more than 6,000 years of history, Nanjing is one of the few cities in China still practicing the country's endangered traditional crafts.
ADVERTISEMENT