Cookie consent

We use cookies to improve your experience on this website. By continuing to browse our site you agree to our use of cookies. Tell me more | Cookie preferences

Why question of guilt still dominates WWI discussion in Germany

    Just Watched

    The Great War turns 100

The Great War turns 100 03:26

Story highlights

  • Commemorating WWI in Germany has always been complicated, Leonhard says
  • Germans tend to view WWI in relation to 1933 and 1939, and rise of Hitler a consequence
  • In Germany, the question of guilt for the war tends to dominate discussion
  • Some argue it's time for Germany to move on and be more outspoken in the world

When the last surviving soldiers of the First World War -- British Tommies and French poilus alike -- died a few years ago, national newspapers in London and Paris, but also in Canberra, Wellington and Ottawa, responded to this transition with numerous articles.

The reason was obvious: For the French as for the British, the former Dominions, but also for the Belgians, World War I is seen still today as the main historical watershed of the 20th century. And it is not by accident that in the political and historical language of these countries this fact is reflected accordingly. The war is not so much commemorated as the first of two world wars but as La Grande Guerre, The Great War, De Groote Oorlog.

Commemorating the war in Germany has always been and still today is much more complicated. Whatever were the consequences of the war after 1918, there was another history that came to overshadow the war and made it only the first of two catastrophes.

In the light of National Socialist dictatorship, the Second World War and the monstrosity of the Holocaust, the war of 1914 became, in the eyes of many Germans, a kind of past past, a prelude to the total war which started in September 1939 and which would lead to the final catastrophe of a German nation state in the 20th Century.

    Just Watched

    Preserving the memories of WWI

Preserving the memories of WWI 03:17

    Just Watched

    The signature that led to millions of deaths

The signature that led to millions of deaths 03:21

It is against this background that even after 100 years, for many Germans the fatal shots in Sarajevo mark the beginning of a second Thirty Years War of unprecedented violence between 1914 and 1945 -- in other words there is a stark tendency to view the First World War in relation to 1933 and 1939, and to see the rise of Hitler as a consequence of the burden which the war and the following peace treaty of Versailles brought about. The prize of this retrospective logic is a very deterministic view on history: As if the Weimar Republic had been doomed to failure from its very beginning, and as if there had never been any alternative to dictatorship, mass murder and total war.

This constellation also explains why in German discussions, the dimension of the war is reduced to the question of a specific war guilt. Since one cannot possibly deny the responsibility for the outbreak of war in 1939, the debate on 1914 is all the more intensive -- even 50 years after the so-called Fischer debate of the 1960s, caused by the Hamburg historian Fritz Fischer who argued that German political and military elites deliberately caused the war in an attempt to break off the perceived encirclement of the country.

    In a fierce controversy, Fischer was attacked by many conservative colleagues, many of whom had fought in the war. They accused him of confirming, ex-post facto, the allied position after 1918 vis-à-vis Germany and of legitimizing the Versailles treaty's logic, which had so much poisoned the Weimar Republic's political culture.

    The amazing success of Christopher Clark's book "The Sleepwalkers" in Germany a hundred years after the outbreak of the war underlines just how important the question of war guilt still is in the eyes of many Germans. The book's argument of shared responsibility, of all international actors and a complex interaction in July 1914, is translated into some kind of historical exculpation: Yes, Germany caused the Second World War, but it is not the main and sole culprit behind the escalation in 1914 -- and hence German responsibility for what went wrong in the first half of the 20th Century seems to be put in relative terms.

    At the moment one can witness how historical analysis is translated into the politics of history. At first sight this is the core of what seems to be the continuation of earlier debates of the 1960s between followers and critics of Fischer.

      Just Watched

      WWI soldier found 100 years later

    WWI soldier found 100 years later 03:20

      Just Watched

      Who was Archduke Ferdinand's Assassin?

    Who was Archduke Ferdinand's Assassin? 04:51

      Just Watched

      Three unexpected things from WWI

    Three unexpected things from WWI 01:24

    But behind this, another debate becomes visible: One about Germany's self-positioning in Europe and the world. Because for decades the experience of two world wars and the catastrophe of the German nation state meant that Germany would abstain from a leading political role, including military engagements, corresponding to the country's economic strength. Against this background it is hardly surprising that some political commentators argue that now, with the war-guilt of 1914 put away, it is high time to re-formulate a more outspoken European and world-wide responsibility of German politics.

    However it seems surprising that all of this is still a very German perspective on a world war that was so much more than what happened at the Western and the Eastern front. From a German perspective it is all too easy to fall into the retrospective logic of history, to view 1914 in the light of 1933, 1939 and 1945. But the first of two world wars was more than a prelude, and it was more than an explosion of violence in Europe.

    When writing my own book on the First World War in Harvard, many colleagues from the Americas, from Africa, from China, Japan and from India were right in asking for a global view on a truly global war. Compared with this perspective the German view on the First World War is still heavily impregnated by the boundaries of national memory.

    READ MORE: Should nations pay price for leaders' misdeeds?
    READ MORE: Seven things to know about man who sparked WWI

    READ MORE: Meet the 'bionic men' of World War I

      World War I

    • Caption:Philippine and US marines take their positions during a beach assault exercise facing the South China sea in San Antonio town, Zambales province on May 9, 2014. Scores of US and Filipino marines launched mock assaults on a South China Sea beach in the Philippines on May 9 in war games aimed at honing the allies' combat skills. AFP PHOTO/TED ALJIBE (Photo credit should read TED ALJIBE/AFP/Getty Images)

      On June 28, 1914 a European nobleman was assassinated, sparking WWI. Is there a new shift in global power that could lead to another conflict?
    • 1915: British troops at the front in France during World War I. One of them has been wounded and is being attended to. (Photo by General Photographic Agency/Getty Images)

      The experiences of the years 1914-1918 in fact enshrined the notions that language cannot adequately express the experience of combat, that the veteran will often remain silent about war.
    • A volunteer works on the 'Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red' installation by ceramic artist Paul Cummins and theatre stage designer Tom Piper at the Tower of London.

      Thousands of visitors crowd onto the paths circling the Tower of London to catch a glimpse of the extraordinary "sea" of crimson filling the castle's moat below.
    • 8th May 1917:  Women's Army recruits drilling.  (Photo by Topical Press Agency/Getty Images)

      Belinda Davis says "total war" plunged millions of women across the globe into "men's jobs" even as they kept home and hearth running under huge privation. The legacy of that moment endures today.
    • United States Army troops stand in the trenches in France during World War I.  On June 28, 1914,

      It began 100 years ago, but World War I is no remote event. Its carnage and tumult changed our world, shifting borders, upending culture, home life, language and spurring a raft of innovation, says Ruth Ben-Ghiat

      In an era when the telephone was not widely used, soldiers turned to picture postcards, then in their heyday, to send word home to loved ones.