Investigating the President

 Bowles Testifies Before Grand Jury (04-02-98)

 White House Supports News Media's Request (04-01-98)

 Starr Investigation Costs Just Shy of $30 Million (04-01-98)

 Landow Not A Clinton Confidant (03-27-98)

 More Stories...


 Ken Starr Discusses His Investigation (04-02-98)

 More Transcripts...


 Lewinsky Father: Executive Privilege Will Prolong Daughter's Suffering (03-23-98)

 More Polls...


 Legal Documents Released In The Jones v. Clinton Case

 The Willey-Clinton Letters

 The Julie Steele Affidavit

Video On Demand

 CNN Special: What Do We Know? (03-13-98)


Voter's Voice

 Starr vb. Clinton (03-24-98)



 A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal

 Cast of Characters In The Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal


 Community: Debate the scandal on the AllPolitics messageboard.


Reload often for latest news

Judge: Secret Service Agents Do Not Have To Testify

By Terry Frieden/CNN


WASHINGTON (Jan. 30) -- The federal judge in the Paula Jones lawsuit against President Bill Clinton ruled Friday that Secret Service agents who protect the president do not have to testify about what they may have seen or produce documents.

In Little Rock, U.S. District Court Judge Susan Webber Wright handed attorneys for Jones a setback for the second day in a row, by quashing four subpoenas that the lawyers had served on Secret Service agents.

The Secret Service had filed a motion strongly opposing efforts by Jones to have protective agents testify about whether they may have witnessed anything, saying the court should recognize a privilege for agents, and that to testify would impair their law enforcement efforts.

Wright, however, gave the Secret Service the legal victory on different grounds, that testimony and documents could possibly compromise the job the agency does. She said the evidence sought by Jones' attorneys "could possibly provide critical information at the core of how the Secret Service actually functions, and provide those with hostile intent toward the President with important information to use in piercing the Secret Service's protection."

Secret Service

Wright cited continued leaks to the news media, saying such continue unauthorized disclosures could damage the functioning of the Secret Service.

Wright also used language similar to the ruling she issued Thursday excluding Monica Lewinsky evidence from the Jones case. She wrote, "As was the case with evidence concerning Monica Lewinsky, the Court acknowledges that evidence concerning the Secret Service might be relevant to the issues in this case. Such evidence is not, however, essential to the core issues in this case."

Wright repeated that the activities of the Secret Service are involved in the criminal investigation by Independent Counsel Ken Starr. Wright said, "Because this Court must generally yield to the interests of an ongoing grand jury investigation the court will defer to the integrity of the government's criminal investigation."

The Little Rock judge did not grant the Secret Service the "privilege" of not testifying against the president in all cases. In her ruling, Wright said, "There is no need to determine the existence or applicability of any privilege, however, as the issues raised by the Secret Service's motion can be resolved on other grounds."

The Secret Service in Washington issued a statement praising the ruling. "We are pleased the court has recognized the Secret Service's critical mission," it read, "and has prohibited access to Secret Service records and personnel. The Secret Service has long maintained the need for confidentiality with the people it protects."

In Other News

Friday Jan. 30, 1998

Tripp Says She Heard Lewinsky On Phone With Clinton
Indictment Looms For Buddhist Temple
Pandora's Web?
Judge: Secret Service Agents Do Not Have To Testify
Text of Linda Tripp's Statement
Another Odd Episode From Lewinsky's Love Life
Republicans Speak Out On Clinton Controversy
Second 'Near-Miss' Involving Air Force One

Stop Probing Clinton-Lewinsky Allegations

Barnes & Noble book search

Archives   |   CQ News   |   TIME On Politics   |   Feedback   |   Help

Copyright © 1998 AllPolitics All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this information is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.
Who we are.