Support Drops For Military Strikes Against Iraq
A new poll finds 54 percent favor continued diplomatic, economic pressure
By Keating Holland/CNN
WASHINGTON (Feb. 16) -- A new poll indicates support for military strikes to pressure Iraq into complying with U.N. sanctions has dropped significantly since the start of February.
Fifty-four percent of the country would prefer to resolve the current situation in Iraq by continuing to use diplomatic pressure and economic sanctions, although the public would approve of military action if it were taken, according to a new CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll.
Nearly two-thirds say the goal of a U.S. attack should be to remove Iraqi President Saddam Hussein from power, rather than the
Clinton Administration's stated goals of reducing Iraq's ability to develop weapons of mass destruction and to threaten neighboring countries.
Americans don't think that air strikes alone will be enough to remove Saddam
from power, although they do think air strikes would reduce Iraq's
ability to make weapons of mass destruction. Americans would oppose air
strikes against Saddam's weapons sites if those strikes would result in
substantial U.S. military casualties.
The results are based on interviews with 1,014 adults Feb. 13-15, and the survey has a margin of sampling error of +/- 3 to 5 percentage points, depending on the question.
Here are the numbers:
Support Military Action To Resolve Situation in Iraq? |
Yes No |
|
Now 41% 54% |
Feb. 1 50% 46% |
Approve of Air Strikes If They Occurred? |
Yes No |
|
76% 19% |
Question: Regardless of how you feel about military action against Iraq, what do you think the goal of the U.S. should be if it does attack -- |
To Remove Saddam From Power |
|
64% |
To substantially reduce Iraq's capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and threaten neighboring countries |
|
31% |
Sampling error: +/- 5 % pts |
Can Air Strikes Remove Saddam Hussein From Power? |
Yes No |
|
47% 50% |
Can Air Strikes Reduce Iraq's Ability to Develop Weapons? |
Yes No |
|
69% 26% |
Support Air Strikes If There Were Substantial U.S. Casualties? |
Yes No |
|
38% 56% |
Two-thirds approve of Clinton's handling of the crisis
A majority of the public thinks Hussein, not President Bill Clinton, has been the winner in recent confrontations between the U.S. and Iraq.
Nonetheless,
65 percent approve of how Clinton has handled the situation in Iraq, up from 48 percent who
felt that way at the end of January.
Most Americans believe Clinton has
adequately explained why military action may need to be taken in Iraq. And 52 percent say the Monica Lewinsky sex-and-perjury controversy is not distracting Clinton as he attempts to
handle the Iraqi situation.
Winner of Recent Confrontations |
Saddam Hussein Bill Clinton |
|
55% 31% |
Approve of How Clinton Is Handling Iraqi Situation |
Now Jan. 24-25 |
|
65% 48% |
Has Clinton Explained Why Military Action May Be Needed? |
Yes No |
|
54% 39% |
Is Monica Lewinsky Controversy Distracting Clinton From Iraq? |
Yes No |
|
45% 52% |
|