ad info

CNN.com
 MAIN PAGE
 WORLD
 ASIANOW
 U.S.
 U.S. LOCAL
 ALLPOLITICS
  TIME
  analysis
  community
 WEATHER
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 TECHNOLOGY
 NATURE
 ENTERTAINMENT
 BOOKS
 TRAVEL
 FOOD
 HEALTH
 STYLE
 IN-DEPTH

 custom news
 Headline News brief
 daily almanac
 CNN networks
 on-air transcripts
 news quiz

 CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 TIME INC. SITES:
 MORE SERVICES:
 video on demand
 video archive
 audio on demand
 news email services
 free email accounts
 desktop headlines
 pointcast
 pagenet

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

 SITE GUIDES:
 help
 contents
 search

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 WEB SERVICES:
 TIME on politics Congressional Quarterly CNN/AllPolitics CNN/AllPolitics - Storypage, with TIME and Congressional Quarterly

Republican House moderates endorse censure

December 22, 1998
Web posted at: 2:34 p.m. EST (1934 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AllPolitics, December 22) -- After four moderate House Republicans who voted to impeach President Bill Clinton sent a letter Tuesday to Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Mississippi) calling for a "strong censure" of the president, a source told CNN "at least a dozen more (House Republicans) hold similar views."

boehlert
Rep. Sherwood Boehlert  

The four, Sherwood Boehlert and Benjamin Gilman of New York, James Greenwood of Pennsylvania and Michael Castle of Delaware, all voted for the first article of impeachment, charging Clinton with perjury in his August 17 grand jury testimony.

Boehlert also voted for Article II, alleging perjury in the Paula Jones case, Greenwood and Gilman supported the obstruction of justice charge in Article III, and Castle voted against Articles II and IV, which alleged abuse of power.

"We are not convinced and do not want our votes interpreted to mean that we view removal from office as the only conclusion of this case," their letter reads.

"In considering this matter," the four representatives continue, "the Senate should take into account the subject of the President's false testimony, the degree to which his conduct threatens the integrity and functioning of the Government of the United States, and the will of the American voters. We believe those factors may lead the Senate to conclude that a remedy short of removal is in order."

castle
Rep. Michael Castle  

They also recommended the censure "impose a fine and block any pardon."

"I feel strongly that the president did not speak the truth...and in my judgment it had to go over to the Senate," Castle told CNN Tuesday. "But I still feel the Senate which can look at and may want to go for a full trial should at least take this opportunity to look at the possibilities of censure and what can be done to bring this to a close."

But some Democrats feel the letter is too little too late.

"I'm disturbed that they didn't say that before they voted in the House," said Sen. Carl Levin. "That seems to me it would have been a more timely place and time to make that point. I sure wish they would have said that to their colleagues and to themselves, prior to the vote in the House."

White House Press Secretary Joe Lockhart said the letter to Lott was proof a vote on censure would have passed if the Republicans leaders had not strong-armed impeachment through the House.

"This letter is a positive sign that members on the Hill... don't believe that the president should be removed from office and want to find a bipartisan way to put this behind us in a prompt manner," Lockhart said.

Rep. Bob Franks of New Jersey, another House Republican centrist who voted for impeachment, released a statement Tuesday saying he will "endorse the framework of the proposal put forward by two Presidents," Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford, who have recommended a censure proposal that would require the president to admit he lied.

"The president must acknowledge he lied under oath," said Franks, a position he took in the House.

Clinton's supporters are working on a two-pronged defense strategy, looking for a possible compromise on censure while also considering a constitutional challenge to the House impeachment proceedings.

On the first front, the White House hopes to work with sympathizers in the Senate to craft a censure proposal as a way of avoiding a protracted Senate trial.

Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, the Senate's senior Democrat and an expert on Senate procedures, hinted Monday that a censure could replace a trial.

But the strict constitutionalist said only senators could decide on a censure.

"Whether there is a trial or whether there is some other solution, that decision must be made by senators, and it must be bipartisan or it will have absolutely no credibility with the public," Byrd said in a statement. "There must be no deal involving the White House or any entity beyond the ... U.S. Senate."

A source in Byrd's office said the senator has specifically told his staff, "Censure is not unconstitutional. It has no constitutional basis, but censure is a constitutional possibility."

But many Republicans have expressed their opposition to censure.

Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter said censure "is not worth a tinker's damn."

The White House strategy's second prong is more aggressive, with the possibility the White House could question whether it was constitutional for the House of Representatives of the 105th Congress to take action on impeachment and refer its charges to the Senate in the 106th Congress.

Rev. Schuller suggests Clinton resignation

Others outside of Washington are also weighing in on what should happen to Clinton now.

Conservative TV evangelist Robert Schuller, who once gave spiritual guidance to Clinton, suggests the president resign if the impeachment process reaches a trial in the Senate to spare the nation "repulsive testimony."

Schuller, who also served as a spiritual adviser to former Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, made his comments in a Wall Street Journal opinion article and a CNN interview.

"If there is no avoiding a trial in the Senate, by stepping aside (Clinton could) spare our nation weeks, perhaps months, of divisive debate and repulsive testimony," Schuller said.

Criticizing Clinton for a "lack of moral integrity," Schuller, the founder of the conservative Crystal Cathedral based in Garden Grove, California, said he believes Clinton would prefer a Senate trial rather than resigning.

"It would be my fear that Clinton is probably not prepared to accept one ultimate last-resort option and that is resignation if the only alternative is a long, costly embarrassing trial."

Schuller added that if Clinton remains in office the president needs to recapture his moral base to be an effective leader over the next two years.

"My fear is if there is a trial we're going to see the partisanship getting involved again -- attack, counter-attack, a challenge, a counter-challenge and it's disastrous to this country," Schuller said.

Schuller's "Hour of Power" syndicated program reaches more than 20 million people in 180 countries.

CNN's Bob Franken and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Investigating the President
AllPolitics' in-depth look at the investigation into the president's relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

HEADLINES
Starr puts first lady on witness list for Hubbell trial (6-23-99)

Hatch demands conclusion to Justice probe of Starr (6-17-99)

Starr: Independent Counsel Act should not be renewed (4-14-99)

Clinton's contempt citation not a surprise to many (4-13-99)

MORE HEADLINES and 1998 ARCHIVES


DOCUMENTS

Closed-door statements of senators

Full text of the articles of impeachment

Starr report or use the interactive guide


INTERACTIVE

Acquittal Reaction

Timeline


PLAYERS

Cast of characters


'TOONS
Thank you sir, may I have another?

Bill Mitchell: Thank you sir, may I have another? (8-20-99) more

More impeachment toons


DISCUSSION

Message Board: Independent counsel

Voter's voice



MORE STORIES:

Tuesday, December 22, 1998

Search CNN/AllPolitics by infoseek
          Enter keyword(s)       go    help


© 1998 Cable News Network, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.
Who we are.