He ain't dumb, he's my president
By CALVIN TRILLIN
December 13, 1999
Web posted at: 2:31 p.m. EST (1931 GMT)
I wish I could offer George W. Bush some advice about how to
fend off efforts to portray him as a dimwit, but even Dan Quayle
rejected the only slogan I came up with when he had a similar
problem: "Definitely Not the Dumbest Guy in the Deke House."
Political pundits are warning us that the public is in danger of
seeing all the presidential candidates as caricatures--McCain as
a hothead, for instance, and Gore as a manlike object and Forbes
as a terminal dork. Just who might be responsible for leaving
the voters with these impressions is not the sort of question
political pundits bother their pretty little heads about. It may
be worth noting, though, that in recent weeks the New Republic
has carried cover drawings of Bush as a dunce, with the tag line
WHY AMERICA LOVES STUPID CANDIDATES, and as the scarecrow in The
Wizard of Oz, with the tag line THE HARDEST JOB IN POLITICS: THE
WOMAN WHO HAS TO GET GEORGE BUSH A BRAIN.
A front-page story in the New York Times last week pointed out
that candidates opposing Bush seem intent on implying that he
doesn't have wattage sufficient for the job. This is difficult
to combat gracefully. By joking about his own temper, John
McCain not only helped defuse the issue but also picked up some
points for being self-deprecating. In the early Clinton years,
Gore managed to seem less like a piece of chain-saw sculpture
for a while by going on talk shows to make fun of his own
woodenness. But if you're running for President, making fun of
yourself for being dumb is, well, dumb.
At least it has seemed so until now. One of the New Republic
pieces, by Jonathan Chait, argued that, partly because voters
seem to be in a mood to prize personal authenticity over ideas,
candidates see some advantage in presenting themselves as, if
not flat-out stupid, at least aggressively nonintellectual. It's
true that when Bush first got into the race he joked a bit about
his academic shortcomings in college, and when his Yale
transcript was printed in the New Yorker, the impact on his
campaign seemed so negligible that I was moved to write a
couplet that went, "Obliviously on he sails/With marks not quite
as good as Quayle's." (The fact that those marks got him into
the Harvard business school, by the way, is yet another reminder
of which class of Americans has always benefited from the
original form of affirmative action.)
If Chait is right, "Definitely Not the Dumbest Guy in the Deke
House" would be precisely the sort of slogan Bush's campaign
should avoid. When reporters ask him questions designed to
discover whether he really has read James Chace's biography of
Dean Acheson, he shouldn't answer with some foreign-policy
boilerplate from his stump speech. He should say, "Couldn't
finish it. Too many long words."
It's a risky strategy, though. Acknowledging that he's not much
at absorbing the intricacies of government policy might leave
the impression that Bush is sort of like Ronald Reagan, but it
could also leave the impression that he's sort of like Dan
Quayle. It's too early, I think, for the G.O.P. to be pondering
whether there'd be any electoral advantage in changing its name
to the Know-Nothing Party.
MORE TIME STORIES:
Cover Date: December 20, 1999
|