ad info


Asiaweek TIMEASIA.com CNN.com
 > magazine
 home
 intelligence
 web features
 magazine archive
 technology
 newsmap
 customer service
 subscribe
 TIMEASIA.COM
 CNN.COM
  east asia
  southeast asia
  south asia
  central asia
  australasia
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 SHOWBIZ
 ASIA WEATHER
 ASIA TRAVEL

Other News
TIME.com
TIME Europe
FORTUNE.com
FORTUNE China
MONEY.com
Asiaweek Services
Contact Asiaweek
About Asiaweek
Media Kit
Get up to 3 months of Asiaweek free when you subscribe online!


NOVEMBER 3, 2000 VOL. 26 NO. 43 | SEARCH ASIAWEEK


Lucas Oleniuk for Asiaweek.
Fegelman (left) and Kolbert are betting on U.S. biotechnology stocks.

Riding the Next Dotcom?
Biotech is hot — and it has real products

So you're still mourning the demise of the dotcoms? Other investors have moved on. "Biotech is where it's at," proclaims Jason Kolbert, vice president of the U.S. equity research division of stockbrokerage Salomon Smith Barney in New York. He has created a portfolio of 21 health-care stocks that Peter Fegelman, head of derivatives at sister company SSB Citi Asset Management, will use to buy options for the newly launched CitiGarant Health Sciences Fund. The biotech sectorwas the dotcom of 1992, soaring to dizzy heights before imploding under the weight of unfulfilled expectations. Kolbert tells Asiaweek's Cesar Bacani why he believes the incipient boom may be more sustainable this time around.

Why the new interest in biotechnology?

The [stock] performance of the U.S. biotechnology industry has absolutely blown away every other sector of health care. The institutional investment community is beginning to focus on the large capitalized biotech companies as a substitute for the U.S. pharmaceutical sector, which faces patent-expiration risk and cheaper imports. People are asking, "What industry is going to have high growth rates and high margins but does not face these risks?"

A lot of investors lost money in the failed biotech boom of 1992.

If I were to ask you at that time to name three billion-dollar biotech drugs, you probably could not have. Today, biotechnology is a reality with billion-dollar blockbusters [developed through genetic engineering] like Avonex, which treats multiple sclerosis, Herceptin for metastatic breast cancer and Respirgam for severe respiratory infections. Essentially this is a price-insensitive industry. You don't have the option of saying, "I'll live without it." Institutional investors are saying, "This is an American industry, there is not a shred of cheaper imports, these drugs are so new that there is virtually no patent-expiration risk."

So which biotech companies do you like?

There are four such U.S. companies in the portfolio. There is Amgen, which is coming out with three new products. Idech Pharmaceutical — it has an excellent new therapy for non-Hodgkin's disease lymphoma. Medimune is an interesting company which has developed an antibody for severe respiratory infection associated with prematurely born babies. Genentech, one of the largest capitalized leaders in biotechnology, is working on a whole new product portfolio associated with cancer. These are not genomics companies [involved in mapping the human gene], although they are investors in genomics like many traditional pharmaceutical companies like Takeda and Yamanouchi in Japan [which are included in the portfolio].

Aren't these companies expensive?

Valuations on an absolute price over earnings —p/e — basis are extremely high. But Amgen's profits are growing at 25% [a year], Genentech at 35%, Medimune at 50%, Idech at 50%. If you divide, let's say, a p/e of 60 or 70 by a 50% growth rate you get a PEG ratio — that's p/e divided by growth rate — of between 1 and 2. That looks very reasonable [for long-term investors, since the stock price today will be considered very cheap next year if earnings actually soar as forecast].

This sounds like the kind of math we were hearing during the dotcom frenzy.

A dotcom has a p/s ratio — price-to-story. It has no earnings. These biotech companies are real companies with earnings. What's the right p/e ratio for a high technology company like Cisco, which trades at around 100 times next year's earnings? It has [an average historical] annual growth rate of 20%, so the p/e over growth rate ratio is around 5. I'd argue that in many biotechnology companies, you have better relative value than that.

Isn't Amgen having legal problems?

We believe that Judge William Young in Boston is about to rule in a matter of days or maybe weeks that [U.S. competitor] Transkaryotic is infringing on Amgen's patents. In the very unlikely event that Amgen loses, it would be very devastating to the company. There will be no impact on Amgen's operations and virtually none on the fundamental earnings picture. However, investor psychology not only in Amgen but in biotechnology in general will be shattered.

You are not too keen on companies working on gene sequencing?

The genomics industry essentially has no proven track record of management, no proven track record of commercializing technology. We think investing directly in genomics is like investing directly in biotech in the early 1990s.

As knowledge about human genomics is freely made available, will competitors from India, Japan and other countries challenge U.S. players?

The next wave of genomics is understanding what a given DNA sequence means. That science is called proteomics. We think that it will be a U.S.-driven industry because it represents the true marriage of not only science and chemistry, but of computerization and computer technology. We think there are many companies principally in the U.S. that will be unraveling the proteomics mystery. It's going to be years and years before start-up operations outside the U.S. offer a viable threat. And we are probably at least five, maybe 10 years away from seeing viable products created as a result of some of the genomics discoveries that are occurring today.

Back to the top

Write to Asiaweek at mail@web.asiaweek.com

This edition's table of contents | Asiaweek.com Home

AsiaNow


Quick Scroll: More stories from Asiaweek, TIME and CNN

   LATEST HEADLINES:

WASHINGTON
U.S. secretary of state says China should be 'tolerant'

MANILA
Philippine government denies Estrada's claim to presidency

ALLAHABAD
Faith, madness, magic mix at sacred Hindu festival

COLOMBO
Land mine explosion kills 11 Sri Lankan soldiers

TOKYO
Japan claims StarLink found in U.S. corn sample

BANGKOK
Thai party announces first coalition partner



TIME:

COVER: President Joseph Estrada gives in to the chanting crowds on the streets of Manila and agrees to make room for his Vice President

THAILAND: Twin teenage warriors turn themselves in to Bangkok officials

CHINA: Despite official vilification, hip Chinese dig Lamaist culture

PHOTO ESSAY: Estrada Calls Snap Election

WEB-ONLY INTERVIEW: Jimmy Lai on feeling lucky -- and why he's committed to the island state



ASIAWEEK:

COVER: The DoCoMo generation - Japan's leading mobile phone company goes global

Bandwidth Boom: Racing to wire - how underseas cable systems may yet fall short

TAIWAN: Party intrigues add to Chen Shui-bian's woes

JAPAN: Japan's ruling party crushes a rebel at a cost

SINGAPORE: Singaporeans need to have more babies. But success breeds selfishness


Launch CNN's Desktop Ticker and get the latest news, delivered right on your desktop!

Today on CNN
 Search
  ASIAWEEK'S LATEST
Web-only Exclusives
November 30, 2000

From Our Correspondent: Hirohito and the War
A conversation with biographer Herbert Bix

From Our Correspondent: A Rough Road Ahead
Bad news for the Philippines - and some others

From Our Correspondent: Making Enemies
Indonesia needs friends. So why is it picking fights?


  THIS EDITION
COVER: Cronies: Why Asia's battle against cronyism is taking forever
Connections: Li Ka-shing has got them
Fall: Suharto's buddies are fighting their way back
Fighter: Sabri Zain on the new Malaysia
Reformers: Crusaders wage war against corruption
Cronyism in Asia: A primer

THE NATIONS
JAPAN: A housewife's win means politics will never be the same

DIPLOMACY: Why the U.S. was at Kim Jong Il's coming-out party

UNITED STATES: Where Gore and Bush stand on Asian issues

PHILIPPINES: Gloria Macapagal Arroyo rallies the opposition

MALAYSIA: Post reformasi, NGOs push for change

SINGAPORE: Living with Shame — the island-state lightens up

INSIDE STORY
Timor: Despite the dangers, refugees begin the long trek home

TECHNOLOGY
Faded Beauty: Getting nervous about 3G network costs

Please Hold: Firms turn to computers to serve customers better

Best Bettor: Winning at the track just takes the right software

Cutting edge: Snoop-proof and wire-free

ARTS & SCIENCE
Cinema: Digital drive: a boost for Asia's young movie-makers

People: Wiranto croons the wrong note with Indonesian activists

Health: A cold cure that could kill


BUSINESS
Markets: How to survive the roller coaster

Insurance: Who'll be left standing in Japan?

Investing: Biotechnology may be the next dotcom

Renong: Can Halim Saad save his troubled company?

Interview: Hong Kong's monetary chief: no new Crisis


STATISTICS
The Bottom Line: Asiaweek's ranking of world economies

Back to the top   © 2000 Asiaweek. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.