ad info




TIME Asia
TIME Asia Home
Current Issue
Magazine Archive
Asia Buzz
Travel Watch
Web Features
  Entertainment
  Photo Essays

Subscribe to TIME
Customer Services
About Us
Write to TIME Asia

TIME.com
TIME Canada
TIME Europe
TIME Pacific
TIME Digital
Asiaweek
Latest CNN News

Young China
Olympics 2000
On The Road

 ASIAWEEK.COM
 CNN.COM
  east asia
  southeast asia
  south asia
  central asia
  australasia
 BUSINESS
 SPORTS
 SHOWBIZ
 ASIA WEATHER
 ASIA TRAVEL


Other News
From TIME Asia

Culture on Demand: Black is Beautiful
The American Express black card is the ultimate status symbol

Asia Buzz: Should the Net Be Free?
Web heads want it all -- for nothing

JAPAN: Failed Revolution
Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori clings to power as dissidents in his party finally decide not to back a no-confidence motion

Cover: Endgame?
After Florida's controversial ballot recount, Bush holds a 537-vote lead in the state, which could give him the election

TIME Digest
FORTUNE.com
FORTUNE China
MONEY.com

TIME Asia Services
Subscribe
Subscribe to TIME! Get up to 3 MONTHS FREE!

Bookmark TIME
TIME Media Kit
Recent awards

TIMEASIAWEEKASIANOWTIME
SEARCH  GO

about Asia Buzz  |  more Asia Buzz

S U B C O N T I N E N T A L   D R I F T
The Folly of Fighting
Why an Indo-Pakistani war won't solve the Kashmir problem
By APARISIM GHOSH

March 9, 2000
Web posted at 6 a.m. Hong Kong time, 5 p.m. EST


There are, apparently, people out there who believe India and Pakistan can resolve the Kashmir issue, once and for all time, by waging all-out war. Look at the poll on Kashmir on the South Asia section of this site: the majority of respondents say the 53-year-old problem cannot be solved by peaceful means. Who thinks this? Mainly Indians, judging from the postings on our bulletin board and the letters sent directly to us.

    ASIA BUZZ
Subcontinental Drift: Calling Tokyo
Why Japan should be Kashmir's peacemaker
- Thursday, March 2, 2000

Subcontinental Drift: Help Wanted
India and Pakistan can't sort out the Kashmir problem on their own
- Thursday, Feb. 24, 2000

Subcontinental Drift: Mission: Impossible
Why Bill Clinton can't broker peace in South Asia
- Thursday, Feb. 17, 2000

Subcontinental Drift: Troubled Water
Deepa Mehta makes terrible films -- but nobody has the right to stop her
- Thursday, Feb. 10, 2000

Subcontinental Drift: Sharif's Smile
General Musharraf's bungling will make a hero of the man he deposed
- Thursday, Feb. 3, 2000

Subcontinental Drift: Name-Calling
Why branding Pakistan a terrorist state is a bad idea
- Thursday, Jan. 27, 2000

  ALSO IN TIME
Market Q&A
Each business evening with analysts around the region

  ASIAWEEK
Intelligence
The story behind today's news from the editors of Asiaweek

From Our Correspondent
Personal perspectives on the news

The poll and the letters don't represent scientific samples, so it's difficult to gauge the popularity of this view. But it's not hard to see why some Indians might favor a military solution: after all, they beat Pakistan in all three South Asian wars since independence. Victors tend to be oblivious to the folly of fighting. (Perhaps because they lost those three wars, few Pakistanis on our board propose a fourth.) India's successful expulsion of a Pakistani intrusion in Kargil last summer has also fanned jingoistic flames. If our boys could kick the Pakistanis out of Kargil, then why not go the whole nine yards and boot them out of Pakistan-held Kashmir?

 INTERACTIVE 
Ticked off at Asia Buzz? Turned on? Talk back to TIME
 
Here's why not: modern wars don't provide long-term solutions to problems. I could point to the Koreas, the Middle East and other examples from across the globe, but there are perfectly good ones closer home. India and Pakistan have fought two and a half times over the Valley ('71 was really about Bangladesh, but the matter of Kashmir did come up), and they still don't have a solution. Why should we believe more fighting will help?

On the other hand, there's no question that any war would hurt both sides. There's no need to dwell on the catastrophe that would be wrought by a nuclear exchange across the Line of Control--I don't believe that worst-case scenario will ever pan out. There might be bloodthirsty hawks in both governments, but there are also enough sane minds to prevent a holocaust. And the chances of a full-scale conventional war ended with the tit-for-tat nuclear testing in '98.

Any future fighting over Kashmir will be a variant of the Kargil skirmish. Let's replay that sorry episode in our minds. First, Pakistani troops and Islamic guerrillas use the cover of winter to occupy a patch of Kashmir on the Indian side of the LOC. Come the thaw, the Indians discover the intruders. Both sides exchange furious fire. As international pressure mounts on both sides to exercise restraint, Islamabad denies that the men on the mountain are Pakistani regulars. Delhi says it has proof--documents and ID cards found on dead soldiers; but Pakistan says these are forged. TIME publishes an interview with a Pakistani soldier that points to Islamabad's culpability. But the United Nations and Western powers are too cautious to pass judgment. Meanwhile in the mountains, hundreds die before the Indians eject the intruders.

Who gained what from the fighting? The Pakistani military got a slap in the face, but it wasn't hard enough to hurt the generals' credibility at home. Witness the popularity of General Pervez Musharraf's coup. The Indians felt victorious for a while, but soon the news from Kashmir returned to "normal"--rebels killing soldiers, soldiers killing rebels and lots of innocent people dying in the crossfire. Since the rest of the world was loath to blame Islamabad for the fighting, Delhi failed to gain any diplomatic leverage from Kargil.

So India and Pakistan are back to the status quo--which is exactly where any future fighting will take them. War is a waste of time and resources. Talking, as hard as it might be, is the only way to peace.

Ticked off at Asia Buzz? Turned on? Talk back to TIME
Write to TIME at mail@web.timeasia.com
Search for recent Asia Buzz

TIME Asia home

AsiaNow


  LATEST HEADLINES:

WASHINGTON
U.S. secretary of state says China should be 'tolerant'

MANILA
Philippine government denies Estrada's claim to presidency

ALLAHABAD
Faith, madness, magic mix at sacred Hindu festival

COLOMBO
Land mine explosion kills 11 Sri Lankan soldiers

TOKYO
Japan claims StarLink found in U.S. corn sample

BANGKOK
Thai party announces first coalition partner



TIME:

COVER: President Joseph Estrada gives in to the chanting crowds on the streets of Manila and agrees to make room for his Vice President

THAILAND: Twin teenage warriors turn themselves in to Bangkok officials

CHINA: Despite official vilification, hip Chinese dig Lamaist culture

PHOTO ESSAY: Estrada Calls Snap Election

WEB-ONLY INTERVIEW: Jimmy Lai on feeling lucky -- and why he's committed to the island state



ASIAWEEK:

COVER: The DoCoMo generation - Japan's leading mobile phone company goes global

Bandwidth Boom: Racing to wire - how underseas cable systems may yet fall short

TAIWAN: Party intrigues add to Chen Shui-bian's woes

JAPAN: Japan's ruling party crushes a rebel at a cost

SINGAPORE: Singaporeans need to have more babies. But success breeds selfishness


Launch CNN's Desktop Ticker and get the latest news, delivered right on your desktop!

Today on CNN

 Search

Back to the top  © 2000 Time Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.