Review: Genius is as genius does in 'Good Will Hunting'
December 8, 1997
Web posted at: 4:46 p.m. EST (2146 GMT)
From Reviewer Paul Tatara
(CNN) -- Matt Damon is my favorite new movie star, and it
shocks me to find myself admitting it. After having the
agreeable but none-too-exciting Matthew McConaughey
pre-digested and forced down our throats as the Next Big
Thing a couple years back, I eyed the spate of recent
magazine covers featuring Damon's toothsome grin with more
than a little bit of leftover disdain. However, after fully
enjoying Damon's subtle performance in "The Rainmaker" and
now having seen his equally impressive but altogether
different work in "Good Will Hunting," I have to say that I'm
a true believer.
In both films Damon manages to be ingratiating without
jumping through good lookin' movie star hoops, and he already
shows signs of having real range. If you have to compare,
let's compare him to the "Somebody Up There Likes Me"-era
Paul Newman and hope that he can continue to grow as Newman
did, without compromising the charisma that he so
effortlessly generates on screen.
Damon and his real-life childhood best friend, actor Ben
Affleck, wrote the screenplay for, and also perform together,
in "Good Will Hunting." The "Will" of that unfortunate title
is Damon's character, a hot-headed Irish kid who (along with
his best friends, the closest being Affleck's Chuckie) is
fighting and drinking his way through life in Boston's
working-class bars. Though he's perceived as nothing more
than an M.I.T. janitor with a lengthy police record, Will is
perfectly content carousing his life away with his buddies in
this salt-of-the-earth milieu. He's simply one of the guys.
The only thing that separates him from his friends is that he
happens to be a genius.
But that doesn't mean that he's good at memorizing batting
averages. Will is an out-and-out Einstein-level math whiz.
He also has a photographic memory, and can casually reel off
historical facts and economic theories like he's ordering
another pint of Guinness. After a professor at the Institute
(Stellan Skarsgard) discovers that the surly janitor he's
argued with in the hallway is capable of off-handedly
deciphering mathematical equations that leave his graduate
students staring blankly at the chalkboard, Will is taken
under the professor's wing. The police (he was in jail for
striking an officer) have placed one provision upon Will's
release -- he must seek psychological counseling.
Some of the best moments in the script come when Will toys
with a series of psychologists, even pretending to be
hypnotized at one point to prove that he's way ahead of their
game (he bursts into a chorus of "Afternoon Delight" while
supposedly under the spell). In desperation, Will's new
caretaker hooks him up with an old friend, Sean, a junior
college psychology teacher played by Robin Williams. Sean
hails from the same Boston neighborhood that Will does, and
it's hoped he'll be able to get through to the kid, to
convince him that he has an immense gift that could mean a
way out of his dead-end life.
This is where the movie starts to go wrong, but I don't want
to make it seem like it falls apart completely. The
relationship between Will and Sean is a little too
conveniently written. Sean's continuous mourning of his
dead wife puts the doctor and his patient in equally-tenuous
psychological territory, and, if you've ever seen "Ordinary
People," you've seen most of this relationship before. There
are, however, enough fine moments spread throughout the film
to serve as a buffer against some of the heavier-handed
stuff.
Damon and Affleck (who gives such a nice performance here I'm
willing to forgive the clunk-and-clink he had to participate
in in "Chasing Amy") are darn good screenwriters, and I'll
tell you exactly why I think so. Broadly speaking, when you
break it down, screenwriting consists of three important
parts: character development, dialogue, and structure. Of
these three, the one that can't really be taught to a
mediocre writer is an ability to come up with sharp,
believable dialogue, and this is where Affleck and Damon
shine the brightest.
A good example of this is a brief transaction early in the
film in which Affleck buys a hamburger for one of his moocher
buddies. When the kid says he only has 16 cents, Affleck
holds on to the burger, telling him that he can pay a few
cents a week and put the sandwich on layaway. After some
angry yelling, Affleck eventually gives in (as you're sure he
always does) and forks the hamburger over. This innocuous
little exchange speaks volumes about these two guys and their
past history, and is funny to boot. It's honest and
graceful. However, the script's structure doesn't move with
such charming ease.
Minnie Driver plays a college student who falls in love with
Will, and thank God for Minnie Driver. It appalls me that
there are so many "major" actresses out there (you know who
they are, and, if you don't, you're responsible for the
quotes around the word "major") who pout and preen their way
through huge, star-making roles while somebody as immensely
talented as Driver is very close to unknown with the general
public. Her earthy charm (including a deep laugh that you
could die for) shines brightly in "Good Will Hunting." It's
just too bad that Affleck and Damon didn't realize the extent
to which they had the answers to Will's problems right there
in Driver's character.
The emotional "breakthrough" that Williams ends up forcing
Damon into could have just as easily, and certainly more
emotionally, been established in tandem with Driver's
character. I make it a rule to critique only what I see on
the screen, rather than writing what I would've
liked to have seen, but this really is a situation
where a sometimes powerful, nicely made film could have been
a lot more than that if there had been a little more
streamlining in the storytelling. In movies, as in life,
it's sometimes a good idea to leave the psychologist out of
it and just chase the smart, beautiful woman. And that's the
conclusion Williams' character pretty much comes to anyway.
"Good Will Hunting" has a fist fight, a brief sex scene, and
a great deal of barroom profanity. It's a warm, tender film,
though, and most teen-agers should love it. Rated R. 125
minutes.