Hollywood, government face off over violence in media
Web posted on: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 5:41:13 PM EDT
From Correspondent Sherri Sylvester
(CNN) -- As the nation still struggles to understand recent school shootings in such places as Littleton and Jonesboro, Hollywood and Washington are readying for battle over violence in films.
In Washington, the federal government is mounting an investigation into whether the entertainment industry irresponsibly sells violence to kids. Hollywood is a big target. The probe by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Justice Department includes the power to subpoena studio documents and studio chiefs.
President Bill Clinton ordered the study in a June 1 news conference.
"Our children are being fed a dependable daily dose of violence, and it sells," Clinton said. "Kids steeped in the culture of violence do become desensitized to it and more capable of committing it ... I have strongly urged people in the entertainment industry to consider the consequences of what they create and how they advertise it."
In Hollywood, some industry officials are preparing a defense in the name of First Amendment rights. The Directors Guild of America voted Saturday to lobby against legislative restrictions and to provide legal help to directors who become targets of what the guild members termed "government intrusion."
But not everyone in the industry shares that view.
The debate is reminiscent of the "tobacco wars" that have raged in recent years -- at least, according to lawmakers who are targeting Hollywood and how they market films.
"We are in fact treating violent media like tobacco, and other products that pose a risk to our children," says Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut.
But the powers in Hollywood are resistant to the idea of their creations being controlled by the government. Jack Valenti, who heads the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), is meeting privately with many in the entertainment industry to counter the attacks.
"Movies can't be treated like cigarettes or products, because they're not," he says. "They're First Amendment-embraced and First Amendment-protected. I think Washington ought to keep its nose out of anything that's creative."
Lines from the players
Comments by some others in the film industry illustrate the breadth of thoughts on the issue.
The debate is coming to a head in the most profitable season for Hollywood, the summer-film release period. And this summer, one effect already is in evidence.
Theater owners and video dealers are pledging to card moviegoers for upcoming R-rated films. Behind the scenes, the title of the horror film "Killing Mrs. Tingle" -- latest project of "Scream" writer-director Kevin Williamson -- has been changed to "Teaching Mrs. Tingle." Disney reportedly mandated less violence in Martin Scorsese's "The Gangs of New York."
But there's hardly an end to violent pictures in sight. Spike Lee's "Summer of Sam" recounts events surrounding the infamous "Son of Sam" killings in 1977 New York. "Arlington Road" focuses on domestic terrorism. Both are to be released in the coming weeks.
"The fact that we make a movie about it isn't gratuitous," says "Arlington" star Tim Robbins. "It's our job. And certainly if you're a government that uses violence as a solution to your problems, you shouldn't be shocked when teen-agers in your society do the same thing."
So it is that this year, one of the hottest features of the summer movie season may be the debate about what's on the screen.CNN Interactive Senior Writer Jamie Allen contributed to this report.
Hollywood aims to prevent 'government intrusion' after violent incidents
Federal Trade Commission
MORE MOVIE NEWS:
An Asimov twist: Robin Williams, robot
|Back to the top||
© 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.|
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.