Has Microsoft complied? 'A resounding no,' Justice Dept. says
January 13, 1998
Web posted at: 2:38 p.m. EST (1938 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Justice Department told a federal
judge on Tuesday that over the next two days of testimony it
would prove that Microsoft was in contempt of a December
court order designed to stop the software giant from engaging
in anti-competitive practices.
Justice Department antitrust lawyer Phillip Malone told U.S.
District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson that he faces a
"simple and straightforward issue: Whether Microsoft has
complied with his order. The answer is a resounding no."
The Justice Department then called computer book author Glenn
Weadock to explain why the Windows 95 operating system is a
separate product from Microsoft's Web browser, known as
Internet Explorer.
The Justice Department says that Microsoft violated the
judge's order to the software maker to stop requiring
personal computer manufacturers to include the Internet
Explorer along with Windows 95 in new PCs.
In an opening statement, lawyers for Microsoft said the
company would show that the "government's proof will fall far
short" and said "it is the government that may have created
confusion in the minds of the court and the public."
The hearing was expected to conclude Wednesday. Judge
Jackson is expected to rule within a few days whether
Microsoft is in contempt of his order and, if so, whether to
grant the government's demand that Microsoft be fined.
Special section:
CNN Community:
Related stories:
Related sites:
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
Watch Science & Technology Week on CNN for more sci-tech stories.
© 1998 Cable News Network, Inc.
A Time Warner Company
All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which
this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.