ad info

Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  





Bush signs order opening 'faith-based' charity office for business

Rescues continue 4 days after devastating India earthquake

DaimlerChrysler employees join rapidly swelling ranks of laid-off U.S. workers

Disney's is a goner


4:30pm ET, 4/16









CNN Websites
Networks image

Special Event

President Clinton Addresses U.N. Millennium Summit

Aired September 6, 2000 - 9:53 a.m. ET


DARYN KAGAN, CNN ANCHOR: For that, we want to go to the United Nations, President Clinton addressing world leaders.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Madam President, Mr. Secretary General, my fellow leaders, let me begin by saying it is a great honor to have this unprecedented gathering of world leaders in the United States.

We come together not just at a remarkable moment on the calendar, but at the dawn of a new era in human affairs, when globalization and the revolution in information technology have brought us closer together than ever before.

To an extent unimaginable just a few years ago, we reach across geographical and cultural divides. We know what is going on in each others' countries. We share experiences, triumphs, tragedies, aspirations.

Our growing interdependence includes the opportunity to explore and reap the benefits of the far frontiers of science and the increasingly interconnected economy.

And as the secretary general just reminded us, it also includes shared responsibilities to free humanity from poverty, disease, environmental destruction and war. That responsibility, in turn, requires us to make sure the United Nations is up to the job.

Fifty-five years ago, the UN was formed to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war. Today, there are more people in this room with the power to achieve that goal than have ever been gathered in one place.

We find today fewer wars between nations, but more wars within them.

Such internal conflicts often driven by ethnic and religious differences took 5 million lives in the last decade, most of them completely innocent victims. These conflicts present us with a stark challenge: Are they part of the scourge the UN was established to prevent? If so, we must respect sovereignty and territorial integrity but still find a way to protect people as well as borders.

The last century taught us that there are times when the international community must take a side, not merely stand between the sides or on the sidelines.

We faced such a test and met it when Mr. Milosevic tried to close the last century with the final chapter of ethnic cleansing and slaughter. We have faced such a test for 10 years in Iraq where the UN has approved a fair blueprint spelling out what must be done. It is consistent with our resolutions and our values and it must be enforced.

We face another test today in Burma where a brave and popular leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, once again has been confined, with her supporters in prisons and her country in distress, in defiance of repeated UN resolutions.

But most conflicts and disputes are not so clear-cut. Legitimate grievances and aspirations pile high on both sides. Here there is no alternative to principled compromise and giving up old grudges in order to get on with life.

Right now, from the Middle East, to Burundi, to Congo, to South Asia, leaders are facing this kind of choice between confrontation and compromise.

Chairman Arafat and Prime Minister Barak are with us here today. They have promised to resolve the final differences between them this year, finally completing the Oslo process embodied in the Declaration of Principles signed seven years ago this month at the White House.

To those who have supported the right of Israel to live in security and peace, to those who have championed the Palestinian cause these many years, let me say to all of you: They need your support now more than ever to take the hard risks for peace. They have the chance to do it. But like all life's chances, it is fleeting and about to pass. There is not a moment to lose.

When leaders do seize this chance for peace, we must help them. Increasingly, the United Nations is being called into situations where brave people seek reconciliation, but where the enemies of peace seek to undermine it.

In East Timor, had the United Nations not engaged, the people would have lost a chance to control their future.

Today, I was deeply saddened to learn of the brutal murder of the three UN relief workers there by the militia in west Timor, and I urge the Indonesian authorities to put a stop to these abuses.

In Sierra Leone, had the United Nations not engaged, countless children now living would be dead.

But in both cases, the UN did not have the tools to finish the job. We must provide those tools, with peacekeepers that can be rapidly deployed with the right training and equipment, missions well- defined and well-led, with the necessary civilian police.

And we must work as well to prevent conflict; to get more children in school; to relieve more debt in developing countries; to do more to fight malaria, tuberculosis and AIDS, which cause a quarter of all the deaths in the world; to do more to promote prevention and to stimulate the development and affordable access to drugs and vaccines; to do more to curb the trade in items which generate money that make conflict more profitable than peace, whether diamonds in Africa or drugs in Colombia.

All these things come with a price tag, and all nations, including the United States, must pay it. These prices must be fairly apportioned and the UN structure of finances must be fairly reformed so the organization can do its job.

But those in my country or elsewhere who believe we can do without the UN, or impose our will upon it, misread history and misunderstand the future.

Let me say to all of you, this is the last opportunity I will have as president to address this General Assembly. It is the most august gathering we have ever had because so many of you have come from so far away.

If I have learned anything in these last eight years, it is, whether we like it or not, we are growing more interdependent. We must look for more solutions in which all sides can claim a measure of victory and move away from choices in which someone is required to accept complete defeat. That will require us to develop greater sensitivity to our diverse political, cultural and religious claims. But it will require us to develop even greater respect for our common humanity.

The leaders here assembled can rewrite human history in the new millennium. If we have learned the lessons of the past, we can leave a very different legacy for our children. But we must believe the simple things, that everywhere, in every land, people in every station matter. Every one counts, every one has a role to play, and we all do better when we help each other.

Thank you, and God bless you all.

KAGAN: A nostalgic President Clinton making his final address as president to the General Assembly of the United Nations, saying: If there is one thing he has learned in the last eight years is that the world is growing ever more interdependent, and all the countries must work together to get along and find peace.



Back to the top  © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.