Edition: U.S. | Arabic | Set Pref

 

Return to Transcripts main page

STATE OF THE UNION WITH JOHN KING

Interview With Senators Klobuchar, Nelson; Interview With Governor Pawlenty

Aired September 6, 2009 - 09:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.


JOHN KING, CNN ANCHOR: I'm John King live at the Minnesota state fair, and this is a special Labor Day edition of "State of the Union."

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

KING: It is a big concern here at the state fair and at workplaces and schools across America. How big is the H1N1 risk and is the government ready?

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: I don't want anybody to be alarmed, but I do want everybody to be prepared.

KING: Plus, the health care flash points at the fairgrounds and back in Washington, as the president prepares for a high-stakes address to a joint session of Congress. Time for a deal or more partisan gridlock?

We put your questions to key voices. Democratic Senators Amy Klobuchar and Ben Nelson. Minnesota's Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty, and the director of the Centers for Disease Control, Dr. Thomas Frieden.

Then, our "American Dispatch" from Waterloo, Wisconsin. A dairy farmer who relies on cooperatives for feed, seeds and now his health care, says reform doesn't have to mean more government spending.

This is "State of the Union" report for Sunday, September 6th.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

KING: Labor Day weekend means more than the final days of the Minnesota state fair and summer vacation. Congress is coming back from an August break, defined by feisty health care town halls, and President Obama faces a decisive test. Support for his reform ideas is slipping, and the president is betting on a speech Wednesday to a joint session of Congress to reframe the health care fight more to his liking.

Mr. Obama's biggest challenge is bridging differences in his own Democratic Party over how much the government can afford, how best to reduce the costs, and whether there must be a so-called public or government-run insurance option. As the president is fond of saying, if it were easy, someone would have already done it.

But what must he do now? We begin with two Democratic senators who want big changes, but don't always see eye to eye. Minnesota's Amy Klobuchar is here with me at the state fair, and Ben Nelson of Nebraska joins us from Omaha. Senator Klobuchar, let me start with you. A big speech from the president. What is the one thing you need to hear from him to convince you he has the momentum and the initiative back? KLOBUCHAR: I believe, after spending many days here at the state fair, the Minnesota state fair, the mother of all town hall meetings, people everywhere wanting to talk to you -- people really want to see a focus on affordability and cost. That seems to me what brings people together across party lines and emphasis on how can we make this more affordable. They realized, and I think times have changed over August, things have calmed a teenie bit, and people have started to step back and say, you know what? I know that my premiums have doubled in the last 10 years, and I have every reason to believe they're going to double again and that's what the numbers show. If you're a senior, going to be a senior by 2017, Medicare is going in the red. So this focus on costs, accountability, on doing something, getting something done, that's what I'd like him to talk about.

KING: And Senator Nelson, the White House says the president will be more specific. You know the big flashpoints in this debate. What is the one specific where you think the president needs to say, this is the way I need it to be? I'm the president of the United States. This is what we're going to do?

NELSON: Well, I think he has to say if there's going to be a public option, it has to be subject to a trigger. In other words, if somehow the private market doesn't respond the way that it's supposed to, then it would trigger a public option or a government-run option, but only as a fail/safe backstop to the process.

And when I say trigger, you know, out here in Nebraska, in the Midwest, I don't mean a hair trigger. I mean a true trigger, one that would only apply if there isn't the kind of competition in the business that we believe there would be.

KING: Are you ready to accept that, Senator Klobuchar, a three, maybe a five-year period where you see if the private market responds, and then a public option would kick in only if you don't get more access, more affordability, more competition?

KLOBUCHAR: You know, I'd want to see what those triggers are, what the benchmarks are. Because when I get around our state, talk to, like, a small business, a backpack company up in Two Harbors, a guy there owns a company, $24,000 a year he's paying for his family of four, and he says he wouldn't even have started the company 15 years ago if he knew that.

So what I want to see is something where small businesses, self- employed, small businesses are paying 20 percent more than people who work at big corporations, that they have a chance to buy into something. And certainly it's worth looking at, but we have to push competition. We have to do a better job of putting some rules on the insurance companies.

I got involved in this when I got kicked out of the hospital when my daughter was born. She was incredibly sick, couldn't swallow, and I got kicked out in 24 hours. And I went to the legislature with other moms and got one of the first state laws passed guaranteeing new moms and their babies a 48-hour hospital stay. We know we need new rules, so that when your kid gets sick, you don't get cut out of your health care. When you leave a job, you're still able to access health care. So I think a combination of pushing on with some competition, whether it's some kind of a public option, or any kind of a push, and also have those kinds of rules. We need to do something, and that's a consensus I see developing.

KING: In the Senate, Senator Nelson, Max Baucus, the chairman of the Finance Committee, has been trying for months to come up with a bipartisan approach. He has been calling moderate and conservative Democrats. I understand you're one of the Democrats he has called recently. Has he convinced you that he has a plan that not only can pass the Senate but pass the Senate with bipartisan support?

NELSON: No, he doesn't have a consensus at this point in time. I think he still remains optimistic, and is going to wait and see what the president has to say Wednesday night. That might break the logjam and bring some Republicans on.

I know that Senator Grassley seems to be concerned that only three Republicans is not bipartisan enough for him. So perhaps with the right combination of ideas and a trigger and things like that, others might join in the process.

KING: Is that enough for you? The question is, do you do this with 55 or 60, and maybe should the president slow down, or do you do this with 50 and the Democrats use their muscle, 50, 51 votes and go through?

KLOBUCHAR: You know, I'd like to see us at 60. I'd like to see some bipartisan support for this bill.

KING: Is there any possibility of that?

KLOBUCHAR: I do. Olympia Snowe is still hanging in there. She understands how important this issue is for the people of Maine. You see some of the Republican senators coming back, like Senator Corker, saying we hope we can find some common ground. So I do think that it is a possibility.

The problem with going down to 50 is we just have more limited tools in terms of getting the kind of work that needs to get done to help people. The one thing I'd focus on here is just the affordability of care.

You're right in Minnesota, John, home of the Mayo Clinic. A national study came out saying if all the hospitals in the country just followed the protocol that the Mayo uses for chronically ill patients, just on that population we'd save $50 billion every five years in taxpayer Medicare money, with some of the highest quality care in the country. So putting those kinds of incentives in place and getting a comprehensive plan is where we have to go, and that's why getting to that 60 votes would be much more helpful to get the broad support.

KING: Does it have to be a sweeping plan... NELSON: Can I add one thing, John?

KING: ... Senator Nelson -- or should -- please, jump in, sir.

NELSON: I was just going to say, if I might add one thing about that 50 votes, that reconciliation process. People in Nebraska are already concerned that we've been rushing things through, and if we went to some sort of a parliamentary shortcut, I think they would be even more alarmed than they are right now. That's what I heard during the town hall meetings.

KING: Well, then help me out on that point, then. Should the president then drop the idea of having sweeping reform in one bill and go with a more incremental approach and have the people prove, even here at the state fair, Democrats are saying I'm worried about the deficit, I'm worried, can we afford this with 10 percent unemployment and record deficits. Should the president's message be, let's do this in incremental steps and we will prove to you that we will bend the health care cost curve and then do more sweeping things, or is the White House right in saying that you've got to do it all at once?

NELSON: I think that's the appropriate approach. I thought all along that we need to do it in a more incremental fashion. There are things we can do with prevention and wellness, increasing the workforce, coming up with the idea of an exchange, where people can check out rates and there would be more competition available, and people would be aware of it. So there are a number of things to bend the cost curve. Wellness programs would be a part of that, as well as improving the quality of care, moving away from the quantity of care. These are things that can be done.

KING: I want to show you both some things I picked up here at the state fair. These are from the Republican Party here. You have a button here that says, "Change? I'd like mine back." This one, "hands off my health care."

To oppose something is pretty easy. To sell something hard is much more difficult. As the president goes before the Congress Wednesday night, Senator Klobuchar, to you first, does he have a policy problem or a marketing problem?

KLOBUCHAR: First of all, I think it's a great opportunity as I look at the pot roast booths behind you for him to put the meat on the bones, to really give the American people some details. Because when I look back at this debate, I think one of the issues was when it first came up, it came out as, oh, here is the big plan, you could get this, you could get this, you could get that. And Americans, still struggling with the economy, understandably, looking at some of the debt and deficits that we're facing said, wait a minute.

So I think it's very important that the president steps back and says, we have a problem here. A lot of people have good health care. A lot of people love their doctors, and we want to keep that. But the truth is, doubling of premiums in the next 10 years, just like you've seen in the last 10 years, Medicare going in the red by 2017, we have to work together to get this done, and I think that will help. In terms of policy, one of the good things about August and about these last few months is that members of Congress are engaged like never before, and the people of this country are engaged like never before. So the fact that some of these debates have been had, that options have been out there, that people have talked about things, can be a good thing.

I spent the last few weeks, my daughter was with me and she's reading "Tale of Two Cities" in preparation for high school, and she keeps quoting the first sentence, "it's the best of times and the worst of times, a time of great foolishness, a time of great wisdom." So I'm hoping for wisdom on Wednesday night.

KING: Senator Nelson, you were a governor before you came to the Senate. President Obama was a senator before he became the chief executive. Do you have any advice for him, anything he's done in this health care debate so far that you think, Mr. President, you got that one wrong, here's a bit of advice for you?

NELSON: Well, I don't know if it was gotten wrong, but I think they have an opportunity to grab the message now and perfect the message. I think if there's anything that has misinformed the American people, it's the message that didn't outline what the insured public will gain from this.

NELSON: In other words, it was inadequate in explaining to them that the costs are out of control, and that if the costs continue, as Amy has said, to go at the rate they have, then it becomes unsustainable for all of us to be able to cover ourselves with the rising health care costs.

So I think that's the message, to tell people who currently have coverage what's in it for them. What I found during the town halls is people wanted us to do nothing because they're afraid whatever we did, they'd be worse off.

They couldn't understand how they'd be better off. They were worried that something would be taken from them to be given to someone else. And you can't really straighten that out unless the message improves on how cost containment, wellness programs, prevention, all the things that can be done, will benefit them in the short term, but particularly in the long term.

KING: All right. We'll have more with senators Nelson and Klobuchar in just a moment, we'll ask them whether more U.S. troops in Afghanistan is the answer and whether the government is ready for a potential H1N1 flu pandemic. Stay with us.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

KING: The AARP booth here at the Minnesota State Fair, taking a kernel poll. There is the Republican booth there, "Waiting in Line for Obamacare." Health care a big issue here at the Minnesota State Fair, and we're back with Senator Amy Klobuchar and with us from Nebraska is Senator Ben Nelson, two Democrats. I want to move to another issue, because also an issue here at the fair is the H1N1 flu virus. There have been some 4-H students who were sent home from here because they had confirmed cases, others suspected.

To you, Senator Klobuchar, first. Are you confident that the administration has a plan in place to deal with this as America goes back to school?

KLOBUCHAR: They do have a plan, but everyone knows that there is going to be challenges. And I think they've been good about getting out front on those challenges. The fact that the regular flu vaccine is more targeted to seniors and others. The fact that the new H1N1 vaccine really has to go first to kids and to pregnant women. So those -- I talked to some of our health officials in smaller counties, with their education challenges ahead, but I think the administration has made that very clear and has been clear in their message so that the minute the vaccine comes out, people are starting to understand who gets it first. And they're really pushing the regular flu vaccine right now, which I think is also smart.

KING: And, Governor Nelson, from your perspective in a rural state -- and we should note to our viewers you're holding a telephone up because we're having some issues with your audio, if they haven't figured that out already.

Does it concern you that this vaccine won't be ready until mid- October at the earliest, and we're already seeing an uptick in cases across the country?

NELSON: Well, obviously you'd like to have it in advance, but it's a major challenge to get the plan put in place because we're not really certain what is going to happen. These flu viruses change as they go along. What was happening in the spring, not happening the same in the fall.

But I think the administration is taking the right steps. I think we'll be in a position to do everything that we can do. But obviously everyone would have liked to have seen it just a little bit earlier.

KING: And, Senator Nelson, let me stick with you on this point. Another difficult issue facing the president is the question, after already having sent more troops into Afghanistan, his commanding general there believes he needs still more. Do you believe that more troops should go to Afghanistan and do you believe that the president has a clear mission and an exit strategy?

NELSON: Well, I don't know about the mission and the exit strategy, but we are going to have the benchmarks that I've been pushing for some time as part of the Armed Services Committee. We're going to have those available rather shortly, because we do have to know what the mission is.

We have to be able to measure or progress, or lack of progress towards that mission, and we have to determine what it is that we're trying to do with the Taliban, and make the country not another platform for the al Qaeda staging platform for their goals, which are detrimental to the rest of the world.

So these benchmarks I think will be very helpful in understanding what we need to do and how we're doing, trying to get that. Now, Admiral Mullen is coming in to see me this week and you can only imagine what my first question is, why do we need more troops, and how do those troops fit in with the benchmarks that are about to come out.

KING: And so, Senator Klobuchar, here at the state fair and in your travels, do the American people want more troops sent to Afghanistan? Do they think it's worth it? KLOBUCHAR: Well, our focus right here in this state is of so many National Guard and Reserve, Minnesotans serving over there. We've lost a number of brave soldiers just in the last month, so they understand the challenges.

At the same time they know that it has been a mess there for a long time. The previous administration was so singularly focused on Iraq that I think things were left to decay in Afghanistan.

So the president is really changing that policy with a new general, General McChrystal. And I think we need to give him a chance to do his work. You've got a country where people are throwing acid in faces of little girls when they go to school, where they're trying to hold on to having a democratic election clearly with some problems.

And I think it's very important that we give General McChrystal a chance to change strategy there.

KING: Let's step back in closing, we have a minute -- a little more than a minute left. I want you to both assess the political moment more broadly. And I want to start by looking at the president's handling of big issues, because his poll numbers have dropped dramatically.

If you ask the American people, do you approve of how the president is handling the economy, only 49 percent say yes. Health care down to 44 percent. The budget deficit, 36 percent.

And having -- looking at these numbers, you have Charlie Cook, who is a noted public pollster and campaign watcher, writes this: "Wave elections, more often than not, start like this, the president's ratings plummet, his party loses its advantage on the generic congressional ballot test, the intensity of opposition party vote skyrockets, his own party's voters become complacent or even depressed, and independent voters move lopsidedly away. These were the early warning signs of past wave elections. Seeing them now should terrify Democrats."

Senator Klobuchar, heading into 2010, are you terrified?

KLOBUCHAR: No, because, first of all, there is quite a bit of time before 2010. And what this president has said is, he's not going to put his head in the sand. These are major issues that have been left dormant, where no one has done one thing. These health premiums going up, doubling in just 10 years, and he's taking on major issues. I don't think it should be a surprise when we're talking about energy and trying to have more home-grown energy, be less reliant on foreign oil when you look at our health care that we're trying to get more affordable health care, that these are going to create major debates in this country and be somewhat polarizing.

It doesn't mean that there isn't time for people to come together on a solution.

KLOBUCHAR: But if he just had, you know, dealt with things in his place that he had to, pirates and other things, I'm sure his popularity might have been higher, but he decided to take on the issues, and Congress did, that our country has neglected for too long.

KING: All right. Senator Nelson, quickly on that point, should the Democrats be worried about what's going to happen next year?

NELSON: Well, with leadership goes responsibility. And the president is stepping up to the -- this effort. I think there's no question about it.

The economy is changing. I think it's improving. We're not talking about the "D" word, "depression," any longer. We're talking about and debating whether we're coming out of the recession.

Everyone is still concerned about unemployment numbers, but we understand they tend to lag.

When you look at health care, I think he's taking on a very difficult issue, trying to work with Congress, both houses, both parties, to find a solution.

And when it comes to the war, that's a -- that's a carryover from the last administration. I think he's trying to do everything he can there. There seems to be bipartisan support for those efforts that are under way.

So I think when you balance everything out, every era is different, and this one will be different than a previous wave era, where the kinds of things that Charlie's concerned about have happened. I don't -- I don't predict those things this time around.

KING: All right, Senator Nelson in Omaha, we thank you, sir, especially for dealing with the difficulties.

And, Senator Klobuchar, before we let you go, our next guest is your governor, Tim Pawlenty, here at the state fair. Here's one thing the Republicans are giving out.

KLOBUCHAR: Very nice.

KING: Thank you, Governor Pawlenty.

KLOBUCHAR: Oh, I'm sure he'll want me to wear that.

KING: I'm sure he would like you to wear that. KLOBUCHAR: Let me tell you this. I have for you chocolate covered bacon, one of our fair delicacies. I'd like you to eat it on the air.

KING: I'm not going to eat it on the air.

(LAUGHTER)

I can assure you I'm not going to eat it on the air.

(LAUGHTER)

But this is one of the many things we have here -- at least this is not on a stick -- chocolate covered bacon, at the Minnesota state fair, an argument for health care reform in its own rite, right there.

KING: Senator Amy Klobuchar...

KLOBUCHAR: Thank you for visiting.

KING: ... thank you so much for being here.

And up next, the Republican view on health care and other big issues from a governor many see as angling for the chance to evict Mr. Obama from the White House, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, right here when "State of the Union" returns.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PAWLENTY: We don't need a president who can just read a poll or momentarily thrill a crowd. We don't need rhetoric or empty promises. We need a president who has the integrity and the courage to make the tough choices so America will be stronger and safer.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KING: That's Minnesota's governor, Tim Pawlenty, addressing the Republican National Convention, right here in Minneapolis, St. Paul, exactly one year ago.

Democrat Obama won the election, of course, including a comfortable win right here in Minnesota. But that hasn't stopped the governor from taking issue. And Mr. Pawlenty joins us now at the Minnesota state fair.

It's good to see you.

PAWLENTY: Good to see you, John.

KING: Big speech from the president Wednesday night. You have been harshly critical of him and his approach throughout the health care debate. Give me one thing that the president could say where you would say, "OK, he's serious about reaching out. Let's turn off the rhetoric machine and try to do business"? PAWLENTY: Well, one thing he could do -- Harvard University recently came out with a study that said 30 percent of all the health care in the United States of America is medically unnecessary. And one of the driving reasons why that's being the case is a fear of medical malpractice lawsuits.

Everyone in this debate realizes we've got overbaking of the costs because of medical malpractice concerns. So he could take on one of his constituencies, which is the trial lawyers, and say, "You know what? We need to come together on this issue."

Republicans would embrace that as one example.

KING: If he were to do something like that, would you embrace a backup public option, if they went to the trigger approach, that we create a public option but it only kicks in if, three or five years, they'd set a deadline, if the insurance market isn't for competitive, if there isn't more access, there isn't more affordability?

PAWLENTY: There's lots of things we could agree to on a bipartisan basis, John. The public option isn't one of them.

The trigger option simply kicks the can down the road. All it does is delays the inevitable, and for a lot of reasons, it's a bad idea.

I think, if the Democrats embrace the public option, even in the form of the trigger, they're going to shoot themselves in the foot.

KING: What about a thing you see quite frequently out here, including in your state and throughout farm country, is a co-op. If they came up with a co-op approach instead of a public option, could you help them there and support them?

PAWLENTY: Well, Minnesota is actually a state that has elements of a co-op approach. And many, many years ago, people decided, in this state, we're going to have only nonprofit health care providers.

And while it has helped, a little bit, at the margins, it hasn't solved the problem. It's helped, a little bit, at the margins only in some cases.

So to say that that is the solution, I think, defies what we know about the experience with co-ops already. It hasn't substantially altered the trajectory of health care costs.

KING: So do you believe the president will get a bill this year?

PAWLENTY: I don't know. I hope -- I hope that we could come together an a bipartisan basis.

Again, there's lots of things we could agree on, medical malpractice reform, embracing electronic medical records, embracing electronic prescriptions, allowing people to pool risk across state lines, allowing people to be able to buy insurance across state lines. Let's pay for performance, not for volumes or procedures, and much more, and let's set aside the things we can't agree on.

And the Republicans are not going to agree on the public option, nor should they. It's a bad idea.

KING: Let me move on to another issue, another big issue on the president's plate, where, in Congress, he's largely getting more Republican support than Democratic support, and that's Afghanistan.

George Will, a very influential conservative columnist wrote this earlier in the week, "Forces should be substantially reduced to serve a comprehensively revised policy. America should do only what can be done from offshore, using intelligence, drones, cruise missiles, air strikes, and small potent special forces units concentrating on the porous 1,500-mile border with Pakistan, a nation that actually matters."

Is it time for the United States to pull almost all of its troops from Afghanistan?

PAWLENTY: No. I recently returned from my fourth trip to Iraq and my second trip to Afghanistan. The administration has defined the mission in Afghanistan as to to disrupt and destroy the Taliban and Al Qaida and other terrorist forces that represent a threat to the national security interests of the United States.

We need to make sure that mission is successful. And the rule needs to be, when the United States goes to war, the United States wins, and so we need to make sure we do those things to complete that mission successfully, and that includes putting more troops into Afghanistan if needed.

KING: So, on that one, you give the president credit? Has he explained it right, even as he's implemented the policy?

PAWLENTY: Well, I think he's been so focused on the health care policy lately, I don't know that he's been spending a lot of time commenting on Afghanistan, or at least as much as I would like.

But this is a very important issue. People should remember this is where the 9/11 terrorists who were -- schemed and plotted and trained and developed the ability to attack the United States in the worst domestic act of -- attack and violence against this country since Pearl Harbor.

PAWLENTY: The mission there needs to remain.

We cannot allow them to regroup. We cannot allow them to reform in a way that presents a threat to the United States.

KING: Let me ask you a broader question, your convention was here a year ago. We just showed a snippet of your speech. Barack Obama won 53 percent of the vote nationally, turned nine red states blue. Nine states George W. Bush had won four years previously, Barack Obama changed.

As we have this conversation a year after the convention and eight months almost since Barack Obama took office, has the Republican Party taken the right steps, in your view, to repair its relationship with the American people or at the moment are you just benefiting from doubts about him?

PAWLENTY: Some of both. I mean, our strategy can't be, we hope the other side kicks it in the dugout. Now he has inherited a tough situation, but he has, I think, taken the country in a direction that is a movement liberal. And the country is a center, center-right country.

But the Republicans have to articulate a vision beyond just being critics-in-chief. We also have to have our own ideas and solutions and trying offer that as well.

KING: He is supposed to speak to schoolchildren on Tuesday, I believe, and it has caused quite a stir on conservative talk radio, saying the president is trying to indoctrinate our school children. Should the president speak to schoolchildren?

PAWLENTY: Well, this isn't the most important issue facing our nation, but I agree with the Minnesota Association of School Administrators, which is a nonpartisan organization. They say, look, it's the first day of school, people are trying to find their classes. There is lots of issues on the first day of school. It's disruptive.

And so they're encouraging Minnesota school districts not to participate.

KING: Just the day is disruptive or the president under any circumstances speaking to the school?

PAWLENTY: Well, I think there's concerns about the disruption. There is also concerns about is this going to be done in an appropriate manner? I trust and hope that the White House will have a content that is not political and they're not using the public school infrastructure for that purpose.

But I think the main concern in Minnesota has been that it's disruptive to the school day. And in the era of YouTube, if somebody wants to hear a message from the president, they can go get it, it doesn't have to be visited upon them, you know, one moment on the first day of school.

KING: Some would say that's a convenient criticism though, because if you go to your wife's Web site, the first lady -- the official first lady of Minnesota Web site, it says this: "As first lady of Minnesota, Judge Pawlenty frequently visits elementary schools to teach students about democracy and the three branches of government."

If it's OK for your wife, why is not OK for the president?

PAWLENTY: I think it's OK for the president to provide a nonpartisan, nonpolitical message about the importance of homework or the like. But it's really a couple of things, John. One is it's the first day of school, it's disruptive. I said earlier this week, it's uninvited. Normally, you know, we have these things where people invite you in or at least, are open and welcoming of the idea. And so the president I think just has done this in a way that's a little ham-fisted. But I'm sure he'll get it worked out.

KING: If we look at your schedule, you decided not to run for re-election. You're still the governor of Minnesota. But if we look at your schedule in recent months, you've been a very busy man.

I'm going to rattle off some of the states just since June: Washington, D.C., not quite a state, but a travel there; Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Little Rock, Arkansas; Aspen, Colorado; San Diego, California; Chicago, Illinois; I'm not sure I'm pronouncing this right, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico; Orlando, Florida; Bergen County, New Jersey.

I could look at that, especially North Carolina, California, Illinois, Florida, New Jersey, I would say, Tim Pawlenty is running for president.

PAWLENTY: Well, Tim Pawlenty became a leader, along with Haley Barbour, of the Republican Governors Association. So part of my responsibility as vice chair, Haley is the chair, is to travel the country, when appropriate, as time allows, to help Republican candidates for governor get elected or reelected.

So that's part of it. And then as time allows, I'm going to speak to issues that I think my party needs to improve on both here in Minnesota and nationally. And I believe that's an important opportunity and responsibility.

I've learned some things here as a conservative governing in a left-leaning state that I think would be helpful to my party more broadly.

KING: And will we see later this year or early next year, Tim Pawlenty form political action committee for yourself, not to help Republican candidates this year?

PAWLENTY: Well, I would be looking at an organization that would help support other candidates on these issues down the road probably this fall or early winter.

KING: That was a careful answer. But let me ask you something else. I want to go back in time, again, to that convention a year ago. We spent some time before we knew who Senator McCain's choice would be for a running mate. And Dan Balz and Haynes Johnson of The Washington Post have written a great book looking back at the 2008 campaign.

And they write this: "At that point there seemed to be only two realistic finalists, Pawlenty and Palin. Though not particularly flashy, Pawlenty was seen as a more than credible choice, a running mate who might keep the Upper Midwest competitive. He was the safe choice if Palin faltered." In hindsight, Senator McCain make the wrong choice?

PAWLENTY: Well, I'm a huge fan of Senator McCain. I think he made the choice he felt was right for not only his ticket but for the country in the circumstances of the time. Governor Palin, I think, was a remarkable leader for Alaska. She's a friend. I don't view her as somebody who is, you know, a competitor for anything, I view her as a teammate.

KING: You don't view her as a competitor for anything?

PAWLENTY: I view her as a friend. And I think she is somebody who, you know, has been a remarkable leader under difficult circumstances in Alaska. I don't know what the future holds for her, but I think Senator McCain made a choice that was out of the box, and he's sometimes an out-of-the-box leader. Sometimes you need that.

KING: Do you think he made a mistake?

PAWLENTY: No, I don't think he made a mistake.

KING: All right. Let me ask you in closing, as we go. We're here at the state fair, they say attendance is up this year. Nationally the unemployment rate is 9.7 percent, kicking 10 percent. Here, you're a little over 8 percent, I believe, in the state of Minnesota.

Are more people coming here because they're more confident or are more people coming here because it's 11 bucks for a ticket and they can't afford a bigger vacation?

PAWLENTY: Well, maybe some of both. John, the economy here is a little better than the national average. Our economy is about 8 percent, as you mentioned. We've had a little bit of good news with some jobs being added last month, and our unemployment rate actually going down.

We hope that's a trend, but it could continue the other way. People here I think are saying it's a reasonable place to come. It's close to home. But I think there's some of both is the answer to your question.

KING: Governor Tim Pawlenty, we thank you for joining us here. We should note Republicans know that the governor is not seeking reelection, they're handing out these buttons. "Thank you, Governor Pawlenty." Pretty interesting...

(CROSSTALK)

PAWLENTY: And before you go, John, I want to show you this bacon-flavored lip balm...

KING: Bacon-flavored lip balm.

PAWLENTY: ... and even after the bacon is eaten, the flavor endures. So maybe you can bring that back to Washington, D.C., and as you talk about pork, you can get a little lasting flavor there on your lips.

KING: There we go. Anyone who puts pork barrel spending in, gets some bacon balm? Is that how it works?

PAWLENTY: Available here at the Minnesota State Fair, that's right.

(LAUGHTER)

KING: Governor Tim Pawlenty, thank you very much.

PAWLENTY: All right.

KING: Now much of the nation, as we noted, is already back to school with the rest to follow in the week ahead. And parents coast- to-coast are asking the same question, are my children safe from the H1N1 flu virus?

Up next, the director of the Centers for Disease Control tells us why it's taking so long to get a vaccine and what you can do in the meantime.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

KING: The 4-H Musical is a big tradition here at the Minnesota State Fair, but is suddenly off the schedule because of this year's biggest public health concern. More than 100 4-H students were sent home from the fair this past week because four were diagnosed with the H1N1 flu virus, and a dozen others complained of flu-like symptoms.

It is a challenge facing school districts and employers across the country and the world. And the early flu numbers have some worrying about a major pandemic. So is the Obama administration ready? Before we headed out here to the state fair, we spoke with the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Thomas Frieden.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

KING: Dr. Frieden, thank you for joining us. Let me just start with your threshold. Much of the nation is back to school, the rest will be heading back to school in the week ahead.

KING: Based on what you've seen so far, what is your expectation for the number of cases in the United States and the number of deaths we are looking for as we address the H1N1?

FRIEDEN: Only the future will tell what the future brings. What we do know is that with schools back in session, particularly in the southeast of the U.S. but also in many parts of the country, we're seeing a fair amount of influenza and that's very unusual for this time of the year.

KING: If it's a fair amount, I'm going to get up and go over to our wall. As you say, if it's a fair amount already, sir, we have a heat map here that shows some of the cases here. The brighter the state, the higher number of cases. If it's a fair amount already in September and generally it's mid-October or a bit later in the season, what does that tell you? Does that make you more worried?

FRIEDEN: We generally expect that flu will continue to go up after it starts, but this is really something we haven't seen before. It's very unusual to see flu continue to occur over the summer. It's very unusual to see it start to increase this rapidly in August and September.

So only time will tell what the future holds. We do know that two things are essential. One is to intensively monitor so we understand what's happening, where flu is occurring and whether it becomes more deadly and so far, it hasn't.

And second, to be ready to adapt, to be ready to change when things develop. But the fact that flu is here now means that we need to do things now, to address it. That means on the one hand, simple things, like not going to school or work if you have a fever, covering your cough and sneeze, and washing your hands frequently, and for people who are sick, there are special measures as well which we can get into.

KING: We will get into those. I want to first pop in, Wisconsin is one of the states with the highest incidence of cases so far. And I wanted to pull up this from the President's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology. This has many Americans alarmed, that report to the president said 30 to 50 percent of the U.S. population this fall and winter could become infected, 30,000 to 90,000 deaths possible in the United States, concentrated among children and young adults. And perhaps as many as 1.8 million hospital admissions because of H1N1. Are you in sync with these numbers, sir, or do you think that is too alarming a presentation? FRIEDEN: What the President's Council reported and what we completely agree with is that there are a range of scenarios and it's really important that we prepare for scenarios that are severe, and they outline one such scenario and we are in fact preparing for that.

KING: Let me ask you a bit more then. Let me just show the high risk chart then. People 65 and older, children under 5, pregnant women, people with chronic medical conditions and people taking immune-suppressing medications. For people on this list, should they be doing something different than the everyday population?

FRIEDEN: Yes. If you're at higher risk of having influenza or more importantly of getting severely ill, if you get it, then you need to do a couple things. First is, if flu is in your community, and you develop a fever, see your doctor right away. Treatment within the first 48 hours makes a big difference. And when vaccine becomes available, get vaccinated.

KING: You mentioned when vaccine becomes available. That's one of the questions people have in the sense that this first surfaced in the spring. Being told by the government the vaccine should be ready mid-October. Why does it take so long?

FRIEDEN: We wish we had more modern methods of making vaccine, quicker methods of making vaccine. We wish we could turn on a dime and make vaccine to a new strain. The fact is that growing vaccine currently, growing the virus up, growing it then in eggs, a time- honored way of making flu vaccine, which we're confident in the safety and efficacy of, that takes nearly six months.

KING: And as you know, many people get very suspicious and anxious when it comes to this. A new vaccine, rushed into production, what do we know about possible site effects and what do you say to a parent out there who says wait a minute if this is not such a deadly strain, I'm not going to do this, I'm not going to take this risk with my child.

FRIEDEN: Well it's not a new vaccine. This is a flu vaccine that's made in the same way the flu vaccine is made every year, it's a new strain. Every year we add new strains into the flu vaccine. So the way it's being made, the content of it is similar to the flu vaccine that literally hundreds of millions of doses have been given of. My kids are going to get this vaccine when it becomes available. We have a very high confidence in the safety of influenza vaccination.

KING: Is there anything you need, now you're in your new job in Atlanta, is there anything when you get on the phone to Washington, saying you know what, I need this now?

FRIEDEN: Well, I think the challenges are really significant. On the one hand, we have a public health infrastructure, health departments at states and localities that have had literally decades of underinvestment.

And on top of that now, fiscal crisis, so we've had layoffs and hiring freezes and furloughs, and these are the individuals, these are the programs which are really essential to our response, and essential to public safety that are going to have to step up and do the vaccination and coordination and treatment, the communication in the coming weeks and months.

And the health care system, which is going to have to deal with an influx of people who are mostly not severely ill but large numbers, but may have to deal with people who are severely ill, in some parts, may have to deal with vaccinating people in large numbers, and our health care system is not well set up to coordinate.

It's not well set up to have an information system that allows us to manage the population's health, wealth and frankly, it's not set up to prioritize prevention, and those are things that make addressing H1N1 more difficult.

KING: And when this vaccine is ready in mid-October, sir, how many doses do you expect to have at your disposal?

FRIEDEN: Each year, we vaccinate about 100 million people for influenza and the current projections are that we'll have 40 to 50 million doses in mid-October or by mid-October. I think although we might wish we had more, it's actually not going to be so easy to get out large numbers and what we're going to try to ensure is that everyone who wants to get vaccinated can be vaccinated but to prioritize those of highest risk.

KING: Dr. Frieden, thank you for your time.

FRIEDEN: Thank you.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

KING: Up next, east to a dairy farm in neighboring, Wisconsin, for an up-close look at an old practice when it comes to buying supplies and selling crops, co-ops. Now some co-op fans say it is just the new wrinkle needed for the stalled health care debate.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

KING: You see the Minnesota state fair there. It's a beautiful place. And visit the Republican Party booth here, and there are warnings that a so-called public option on health care reform would lead to a government takeover.

And some Democrats oppose the idea, too, saying there are ways to make the insurance market more competitive without such dramatic government intervention.

Try co-ops instead, many say, citing examples around the country of, over the years, of how those without electricity or telephones or other services banded together to get what they needed at a fair price.

So would the co-op system work for health care?

Critics say the needs are too big, or that what works in rural America can't be copied in the big city. Supporters know, here in Minnesota and other farm states think co-ops could solve at least a big chunk of the health care access and affordability problem.

So in our "American Dispatch" this week we wanted to take a closer look. We headed to Minnesota's neighbor, Wisconsin -- Waterloo, Wisconsin, to be exact -- and a dairy farm where co-ops are a big part of the family business.

(voice over): Two hundred and eighty cows here; each eats about 100 pounds of feed a day; three milking cycles, not to mention tending to the corn and other crops. A family farm is a long, hard day's work.

With milk prices down, a profit is hard to come by, which makes Bob Topel all the more grateful for his invisible partner.

BOB TOPEL, WISCONSIN FAMILY FARMER: Seed, fuel, fertilizer, feed -- everything we buy is pretty much through a cooperative. We market our milk through a cooperative. If there is any profit made, the profit returns to the owners. And so, the more you use the cooperatives, the more earnings you get back.

Co-ops have been around for over 100 years in agriculture. KING: And for the past 10 months, Topel has turned to the co-op approach for something far more personal, his health care, joining a 2 1/2-year-old farmers' cooperative he says should be a model as Washington looks for a way to force private insurance companies to compete more for their business.

TOPEL: A lot of farmers who had individual health insurance elsewhere came us to and saw their premiums go down. And -- and the other benefit we saw was there was farmers who didn't come to farmers' health, but by putting an extra layer of competition in the marketplace, their premiums went down just to meet what the farmers' health was putting on.

KING: Competition and choice are the main goals, and co-op fans say their way makes more sense than a new government-run health insurance option.

BILL OEMICHEN, PRESIDENT, THE COOPERATIVE NETWORK: Eighty-five percent of the members of the Farmers' Health Cooperative, for example, reported to us either their premiums fell or they stayed somewhat similar to what they had before.

But as importantly, 65 percent of them said their health benefits actually increased substantially over what they had before. So, where co-ops are, they tend to be very, very high quality because it is the consumer who owns them, that is making sure that their health care provider is a quality health care provider.

KING: In addition to expanding choice and competition, Bill Oemichen of the Cooperative Network says the plans are helping with another big problem.

OEMICHEN: About 12 percent of our members are previously uninsured. So we think we've had a real impact on bringing in producers who previously couldn't get access to health insurance.

KING: Wisconsin has a dozen health care co-ops in all. Some hire doctors directly.

Others use their pooled purchasing power to negotiate better rates with private insurers. The plans are widely accepted across the state, including this clinic in Monroe.

Bob Topel knows critics suggest what works in rural areas or small cities might not fit in (inaudible) suburbs or in urban America, but he's just as skeptical that government has the answer.

TOPEL: To me, just looking at the way the government managed the Clunkers program and managed the -- FEMA and Katrina and all those things, I just -- I don't want to turn my health care over to a government agency and try to get my round peg in a square hole, and if it doesn't fit, I'm caught in some bureaucratic red tape.

With the co-op system, I know the people that I can call and they're going to take care of me because I'm an owner versus just a number. KING: Thanks for Bob Topel for letting us in on the farm and teaching me how to milk a cow. As you know, one of our goals is to get out of Washington as often as we can. We travel to Minnesota, Wisconsin, Florida and many states in between, 33 in all, so far.

So where should we go next? You can e-mail us at "State of the Union" at CNN.com and tell us why we should come to your community.

We want to say good-bye to our international audience for this hour. But up next, for our viewers here in the United States, Howie Kurtz looks at big changes coming to ABC's "World News Tonight," with Diane Sawyer becoming the lead anchor.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

KING: I'm John King, live at the Minnesota state fair, and this is "State of the Union."

When Diane Sawyer takes over ABC's "World News Tonight," what was once the old boys' club of network news will see boys in the minority. Three top journalists will talk about the prospects for just the second solo female evening news anchor.

Plus, the casualties and possibly troop numbers on the rise in Afghanistan. Is the media ready to take another look at America's other war? CBS's Lara Logan joins the discussion.

In this hour of "State of the Union," Howard Kurtz, as always, breaks it down with his "Reliable Sources."

Home  |  Asia  |  Europe  |  U.S.  |  World  |  World Business  |  Technology  |  Entertainment  |  World Sport  |  Travel
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  RSS Feeds  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.