Return to Transcripts main page


Democratic Candidates Hold Big Oil Companies Accountable for Climate Crisis; Big Oil Firms Spending Millions to Block Climate Change Policies; John Browne, Former CEO, BP, is Interviewed About Oil Companies and Climate Change; Former Zimbabwe President, Robert Mugabe, Dies at 95; Finding Joy in Music Even in Political Despair; Angelique Kidjo, Singer, is Interviewed About Music; Interview With Author Marc Brackett; Interview With Angelique Kidjo. Aired 1-2p ET

Aired November 28, 2019 - 13:00:00   ET




CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR, CHIEF INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Hello, everyone. And welcome to AMANPOUR. During this Thanksgiving Holiday, we're taking a

look back at some of our favorite interviews. So, here's what's coming up.

Giant oil companies help get the world into this climate crisis. Are they prepared to help lead the way out? I speak to Lord John Browne, the former

CEO of BP.

Then from liberator to dictator, Robert Mugabe dead at 95. Zimbabwe's strong man in his own words.

And the African singer, Angelique Kidjo, fled dictatorship in her home country of Benin. I speak with her about the liberating power of music.

Also --


MARC BRACKETT, AUTHOR, "PERMISSION TO FEEL": Recognize that emotions matter.


AMANPOUR: The ABC's of managing our feelings with Mark Brackett, the director of Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence.

Welcome to the program, everyone. I'm Christiane Amanpour in New York.

As the 2020 campaign focuses ever more intensely on the climate crisis, Democratic candidates are making it abundantly clear whom they hold

accountable, the world's biggest oil companies and their legions of influence peddlers in Washington. Take a listen.


JOE BIDEN (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Everything I've done has been done to take on the polluters and take on those who are, in fact, decimating our

environment. I mean, it's been my career.

SEN. CORY BOOKER (D-NJ), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I'm sorry. I'm not going to be a president giving tax breaks to people who are polluting folks,

causing cancers, destroying our environment as well.

SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN (D-MA), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: When you see a government that works great for those with money, a government that works

great for those who can make big campaign contributions and hire armies of lobbyists and lawyers and it's not working for everybody else, that is

corruption, pure and simple, and we need to call it out for what it is. Fight back.


AMANPOUR: Now, if you were to judge by the oil companies branding campaigns, the industry is leading the way to be a clean energy future.

But behind the scenes in Washington, top oil firms are spending millions on lobbyists in a concerted effort to block climate change policies.

John Browne was CEO of BP for more than a decade and he became the first leader of a major oil company to acknowledge the link between fossil fuels

and climate change. But it's still not clear whether the company actually met his goals for getting carbon production cut. Nevertheless, Browne's

faith in technology remains unshaken. In his new book "Make, Think, Imagine," he says enlightened engineering will mitigate the greatest damage

from climate change, from infectious diseases and other major threats.

So, Lord John Browne, welcome to the program.

JOHN BROWNE, FORMER CEO, BP: Good to be here.

AMANPOUR: So, there's a little bit of good or a lot of bad? You heard what the candidates have said. You have seen where the people are and

where the polls are on the issue of climate change and whom they hold responsible to a large degree. We mentioned that you did come out in 1997

in a speech in Stanford University acknowledging what many industry leaders don't acknowledge. What made you do it then and are you convinced that BP

has enacted the measures that you called for to cut carbon?

BROWNE: So, I did it then because I believe it was the right thing to do and the evidence was pretty clear that the burning of fossil fuels created

the problem that we have. And so, we had to figure out how we would either clean up the atmosphere or reduce the use of fossil fuels or both. And

that's where we are today.

AMANPOUR: We're still there, 20 years later.

BROWNE: We are. We've lost a quarter century and I think that's time which we've wasted. Now, the good news is, we have an array of engineering

technologies that we could deploy tomorrow to actually solve this problem is. So, the question is, why don't we? Why don't we?

AMANPOUR: Which is what I want to ask you because you are one of those people who is being blamed, maybe not you personally now. But nonetheless,

you know, these big companies and the fossil fuel industry have a lot of political --

BROWNE: Right.

AMANPOUR: -- clout and, as we said, armies of influenced peddlers who make sure that what they want gets done.

BROWNE: So, I think we ought to step back and look at the fact base. Right now, the world uses 85 percent of all the energy in the world comes from

fossil fuels, 4 percent from renewables. I've been a great proponent of renewables. To change that will take a long time. We will still --

AMANPOUR: How long?

BROWNE: It's impossible to say. But normally, we'd say it's going to be decades to change that. It'll change every year. And we have the

technologies to actually capture the carbon being produced and do something with it, either store it or use it for something else, and we have the

technology to improve other forms of energy. So, what --

AMANPOUR: But are you saying the technologies are there to make a major dent now but they're not just being used for that?


BROWNE: Absolutely.

AMANPOUR: They're not being -- it's not happening?

BROWNE: The reason is that they're too expensive. That they cost too much. And so, one of the rules of engineering is the more you do

something, the cheaper it becomes. So, we have to deploy this. And in order to deploy it, we need incentives or specifically negative ones. If

you put carbon in the atmosphere, you should pay a tax. And that --

AMANPOUR: So, rather than subsidize your industries, you need to make your industries and those who pollute pay for that pollution?

BROWNE: Correct. And that tax, I think, wise people would say should not be used for general purposes by government but actually redistribute it to

the population so the tax becomes progressive not regressive. Otherwise, you have the Macron problem where you tax regressively and there are riots.

AMANPOUR: OK. So, you pledged during your time as CEO, as we said, to cut -- that BP would cut production of carbon dioxide by 10 percent by 2010.

We don't see any proof that it's actually happened. Has it?

BROWNE: Well, we were on route. I left in 2007.


BROWNE: And we were on route. We were rebalancing our production towards gas and we were becoming much more efficient as a company.

AMANPOUR: And you think gas is better than oil because?

BROWNE: Generally, when you -- oh, it's much better than that because when you burn it, you produce less carbon dioxide. So, the problem shrinks.

It's still a problem but it shrinks enormously.

AMANPOUR: But your successors didn't do what you had put in place?

BROWNE: So, what happened is the price of oil went up hugely. It went up hugely. And everybody --

AMANPOUR: Everybody got greedy again.

BROWNE: Precisely. Everybody rushed around and said, we must do more because the demand is infinite. And so, let's drill. Let's find things.

Now, we have calmed down again now. Now, it's time, I think, to take a more sober and urgent look. So, the oil companies are investing in venture

capital and they're doing some other things they need to do more.

AMANPOUR: So, you say that and I'm sure it's true. But they are also, as we mentioned, investing a lot in PR campaigns, lobbying, et cetera. The

influence map of U.K. nonprofit think tank says five publicly listed companies, the major ones, ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP, Total, now spend

roughly $195 million per year on branding campaigns suggesting they support climate actions. But they also spend about $200 million a year lobbying to

delay, control, block policies to tackle climate change.

And, you know, they're spending on oil and gas extraction is going up by about $115 billion, you know, 3 percent of that directed to local projects.

It's just -- the two don't equate. What you're saying should be done and could be done and what is actually happening.

BROWNE: There's a long shadow. I think the industry has been always behaving that every threat is existential and therefore must be pushed off.

I've never agreed with that. The reality is you have to face the future not try and preserve the past.

And the future does contain hydrocarbons. There's no doubt about it. It contains less hydrocarbons as we go along but it contains new and different

forms of energy, including I may say also nuclear. But, you know, which is -- has its own problems, but it's very important to consumers.

AMANPOUR: Yes. But major leaders have decided to take the populist route and stop nuclear. I mean, Angela Merkel stopped it after the Fukushima

disaster as if that was a nuclear disaster when it was a tsunami that caused that.

BROWNE: And we've all watched Chernobyl, you know, and the box says and it makes everyone worried. But this is about decision making, it is not about


AMANPOUR: OK. So, again, you have just said that hydrocarbons will be the future, that's a fact. Is that why you still work for a fossil fuel

company, even despite all that you say?

BROWNE: So, I spent 10 years after BP working in renewable energy. Running the world's biggest renewable energy dun and it worked out very

well as it became more and more commercial. I went back to invest in gas and oil in that order and I'm very pleased --

AMANPOUR: But why?

BROWNE: Because we need gas. We actually need gas.

AMANPOUR: Why oil then?

BROWNE: Well, because it comes with it, frankly. You can't be so selective.

AMANPOUR: But you see what you're saying? You are saying that you have, you know, the right ideas, you know that the technology is there and yet,

we can't do it. See, basically, what a lot of people are complaining about is that an industry and their lobbyists and the deniers, et cetera, are

trying to convince the world that the solutions to climate change are more of a threat than climate change itself.

BROWNE: As you probably know, I do -- I'm not in that position at all. I think, number one, we have the technologies to solve this problem. Number

two, we can't deploy them. It needs a change in public policy. We absolutely, in order to get the temperature into a range that is acceptable

in some way, we have to charge for carbon.


We must have a carbon tax then we can deploy the technologies and we will not -- we will still use hydrocarbons because we haven't got the means

whereby to replace them yet but they'll be cleaner and cleaner and cleaner. That's what we've got to do.

AMANPOUR: For those who don't believe in carbon tax or any kind of tax, is there anywhere where it's been implemented that it works and you can tell

us as a CEO of a major or former CEO of a major --

BROWNE: A little bit, in Europe. The European trading system has a carbon tax. It had too many loopholes in it. It was lobbied against. But the

trading of carbon in Europe is getting better and better. Loopholes are being closed. And the price is beginning to get to a point where it makes

people think twice about putting carbon in the atmosphere.

So, you can see that the concept is proven. The concept is proven. Now it needs to be scanned (ph).

AMANPOUR: And it's really getting more and more urgent. If you take a what the U.N. says and it's the latest report that we've got perhaps a

dozen years to get ourselves to a point where we're not going to go over the tipping point. So, it's really urgent.

You saw the eclipse that we've played from CNN's town hall on the climate crisis. It was really a major step forward in how it's covered, how it's

publicized and how, you know, political awareness. Elizabeth Warren, Senator Warren, was asked whether the government should mandate the kind of

lightbulbs Americans should use after the Trump administration announced that its rolling back energy efficient regulations. And she sort of

basically said give me a break. Listen.


WARREN: Oh, come on. Give me a break. You know --


WARREN: No, here's -- look, there are a lot of ways that we try to change our energy consumption and our pollution. And God bless all of those ways.

Some of it is with lightbulbs, some of it is on straws, some of it, dang, is on cheeseburgers, right. There are a lot of different pieces to this.

And I get that people are trying to find the part that they can work on and what can they do, and I'm in favor of that and I'm going to help and I'm

going to support.

But understand, this is exactly what the fossil fuel industry hopes we're all talking about. That's what they want us to talk about. This is your

problem. They want to be able to stir up a lot of controversy around your lightbulbs, around your straws and around your cheeseburgers.

When 70 percent of the pollution, of the carbon that we're throwing into the air comes from three industries and we can set our targets and say by

2028, 2030 and 2035, no more.


AMANPOUR: I mean, she is absolutely right, isn't she? And she basically says that you can do as much recycling and bulb changing and veganism as

you like, but the big, big issues have to be government mandated and a real sort of massive effort. So, I would assume you agree with that?

BROWNE: I'm completely with that. I think --

AMANPOUR: So, what would you say to President Trump?

BROWNE: So, well, what I would say is what I've been saying to every president since I started in '97 on this journey, which is, you have to

handle the big issue, which is we have to be able to attack directly carbon dioxide going into the atmosphere. Actually, also methane, which he's

actually removed some of the restrictions on. It's just as bad. It's actually worse. Make sure that doesn't go into the atmosphere. But all

these other issues are very worthy and I'm sure people are interested in.

But Senator Warren is right. They're not the main event. The main event is to recognize the reality of using hydrocarbons, capturing the carbon and

doing something with it. We cannot let it go into the atmosphere continuously.

AMANPOUR: Again, I guess you're obviously aware of this massive political shift amongst people, and the young people are the major voters of the

future and they really, really have so much at stake, more than you do, more than I do. And they are making this a political issue. And even as

young as Greta Thunberg who has made a huge splash on the international stage brought the children out all over the world to fight and lobby for

their future.

And yet, you know, she's been torn apart on social media by people who should know better and including, you know, leaders and deniers in that

realm. You know, the head of -- the secretary general of OPEC has said, "Climate change campaigners like her are perhaps the greatest threat to our

industry going forward."

And she tweeted, "There is a growing mass mobilization of world opinion against oil." Quoting him. "And this is perhaps the greatest threat to

our industry." Quoting him. "OPEC calls the school strike movement and climate campaign as their greatest threat. Thank you. Our biggest

compliment yet."

Is it counterproductive of people like OPEC and other fossil fuel industries to, you know, rain on this activism?

BROWNE: Okay. I mean, we need activism. We [13:15:00] actually need the population to speak to our politicians saying, you must do something.

Because otherwise, we are missing the final element here, which is changing public policy.

We need that because otherwise, nothing will happen. Costs will remain too high. Incentives will be in the wrong place and nothing will happen. So,

I'm all in favor of people looking at the reality of today. I think the concern about the local climate, of wildfires, changes in seasons, the

melting --

AMANPOUR: Hurricane that we're watching.

BROWNE: Et cetera, et cetera. The fact that, you know, grapes have to be picked earlier to make wine because it gets too hot. All of these things

should be looked at and we should reflect on those things and say, maybe we are causing this and we should do something about it, and push people in

that direction.

AMANPOUR: So, let's get back to your book for the last question, "Make, Think, Imagine." You, obviously, still have a great faith in engineering.

You've, you know, outlined how it has transformed society since the beginning of the industrial revolution.

BROWNE: Absolutely.

AMANPOUR: But people are becoming incredibly wary and suspicious of all these technology with the surveillance, with the, you know, A.I., with the

sort of uncontrollable nature that they think a lot of it has. Why are you so convinced that this is going to save our species?

BROWNE: Because balance, on vast balance, it does great things for us. It's helped our health, our longevity, it's reduced violence in the world,

it's made things safer. It's made people have a hope for the future. Some things go wrong, we have to react to them. Some other countries will abuse

the use of these technologies because they have different standards in human rights, but it doesn't mean to say we throw them away. We have to

keep working on them.

And I say somewhat flippantly but, I think, truly that the solution toward engineering difficulty is not less engineering it's more engineering.

AMANPOUR: Well, let's see. Thank you so much indeed, Lord John Browne.

BROWNE: It's a pleasure.

AMANPOUR: Thank you.

Let us turn now to Zimbabwe in Southern Africa, which is marking the end of an era. The founding father and former president and dictatorial strong

man, Robert Mugabe, has died today at the age of 95 in a Singapore hospital. And he leaves behind a very complicated legacy. The former

school teacher is still celebrated across the continent for leading his country to independence from white minority British rule.

But unlike Nelson Mandela, South Africa's heroic freedom fighter, Mugabe became the poster child for a (INAUDIBLE) hellbent on oppressing his

critics and staying in power. I asked him about all of that when we sat down for a rare interview here in New York back in 2009. Here is a little



AMANPOUR: Why is it so difficult to leave power in a reasonable way when you're up, instead of waiting until it gets to this stage?

ROBERT MUGABE, ZIMBABWE PRESIDENT: Not when -- you don't leave (INAUDIBLE) when imperialist dictate that you leave. The --

AMANPOUR: No, imperialist. You were the president.

MUGABE: No. There is regime change. Haven't you heard of regime change program by Britain and the United States, which is aimed at getting not

just Robert Mugabe out of power but Robert Mugabe and his party out of power. And that naturally means we dig in, remain in our trenches.

AMANPOUR: Are you going to stand for election again?

MUGABE: That will depend on what I decide to do in the future.

AMANPOUR: Can you tell us?

MUGABE: No, not now.


AMANPOUR: He told me then that only God could remove him from office. So heavily was dug in. Well, nearly a decade later, that God showed up as

mass protests that lead his own military and his own party leaders to turn on him. That was in 2017.

But Zimbabweans still struggle today under Mugabe's legacy and the rule of his former security chief who is now president.

My next guest chose to flee Africa as a young woman because, at the time, her home country, Benin, in the west, was also suffering at the hands of

the despotic ruler. But Angelique Kidjo's brilliant creative spirit was her bridge out of the political darkness. She's one of the world's great

vocalists and she also uses that talent to fight for human rights everywhere. In her new album "Celia," Kidjo she plays tribute to the

iconic Cuban salsa singer, Celia Cruz.



Now, when I spoke to Angelique Kidjo here in New York, we talked about her limitless capacity for finding joy in music even in times of deepest

political despair.

Angelique Kidjo, welcome back to the program.

ANGELIQUE KIDJO, SINGER: It's always a pleasure to be with you.

AMANPOUR: So, you have literally had a bumpy year. You're having a bumpy year. There's so much work that you're doing right now. I mean, cover

albums, the proms, the famous end of summer music festival at the Royal Albert Hall. You're curating concerts here at Carnegie Hall.

What is it about right now for you?

KIDJO: I think right now for me have a sense of emergency. In a world where I think we all are losing ground, a lot of things are happening,

there's a lot of anger and at the sight of the anger, you have a lot of people doing wonderful stuff. But we focus more on the anger than the

positive things.

And for me, music is about building bridges. It's about bringing people together to a common share humanity. And that's why I'm like -- I'm

devouring everything that comes my way and giving it back to the public. And it has been a really rollercoaster journey that I'm taking but I like

that, it keeps me young.

AMANPOUR: I think it's amazing. I mean, it keeps you young. That's great. You definitely look young. We're about the same age. You're

outdoing me.


AMANPOUR: But you're doing something that you hadn't necessarily done before. You, as I've said, doing some cover albums, cover songs. One of

the bands that's so well-known too, American and Western audiences, I guess, are the Talking Heads. Erupted on to the scenes in the early '80s,

I think. And you did a cover last year including a song that you said had inspired you, you know, once in a lifetime. You did their album, "Remain

in Light." Do you fancy just giving me some of your joy right now?

KIDJO: Oh, yes.

AMANPOUR: Go on then.

KIDJO: Letting the days go by. Letting the days go by. Into the blue again. Once in a lifetime

AMANPOUR: It's great, Angelique. It really is. And when you sing, your whole face comes alive and it does definitely impact on the audience. But

what was it about that song and that group? When did you first hear them and how did they inspire you?

KIDJO: I mean, I heard the song "Once in a Lifetime" actually when I arrived in 1983. Three months after I arrived, I was trying to tag along

with friends in my music school. And even though you speak a language and share the same culture, pretty much, with people, it's always difficult to

leave your home. No one live in exile by choice and find it very fun.

And some of my -- the musical friend that I was making at that time said, well, let's go raid my fridge. My parent just fill up my fridge. I'm

like, free food? Student. I'm tagging along. I'm going along.

AMANPOUR: Raiding your friends' parent's fridge?


AMANPOUR: Here in United States?

KIDJO: No, in Paris.


KIDJO: I'm like, OK. Let's go for it.

AMANPOUR: So, you came from the African nation of Benin.

KIDJO: Benin where we have --

AMANPOUR: A communist dictatorship?

KIDJO: -- a dictatorship.


KIDJO: For the 10 or 12 years that followed their arrival, music was banned at radio.

AMANPOUR: Literally?

KIDJO: Literally. Our music was banned. Only thing you hear is (INAUDIBLE) day in and day out. Everything (INAUDIBLE).

AMANPOUR: And just so that we understand, that ready for the revolution, the fight continues.

KIDJO: The fight continues.

AMANPOUR: So, they banned pop music or --

KIDJO: All of it.

AMANPOUR: Why? What was the reason?

KIDJO: Well, it's not -- it might make her think about freedom. That's what music does. If you see any dictatorship that comes in place, culture

is the first thing they crush. Because culture gives people strength to stand up for their right. When you decide to listen to music in your room,

it's not someone from a government, it's your will. Your free will to do that. And what that music reveals from your life is something that is


AMANPOUR: You know, that's really an incredible story because, obviously, we remember the counter culture here in the United States, the '60s, all

the incredible music associated with that during the student uprisings, the protests against Vietnam, political protests. But you're saying that you

had that in your bedroom in Benin --

KIDJO: Absolutely.

AMANPOUR: -- when you were growing up.

KIDJO: Absolutely. All the kind of music. I mean, my father and mother - - I'm realizing as I grew older that what I've taken for granted is sometimes annoyed me because my mom and dad always used to tell us every

morning, a human being is not a matter of color. If you come back and you fail you say you're black, I'm -- come on, stop.

And I grew up and move and it helped me, actually, accept people not thinking the same way I think but allowing the conversation to going on.

We can disagree but as long as we talk to each other, it's okay. If we stop talking to each other, we go into war. We go into violence and it's

unnecessary. We don't need to get there.

AMANPOUR: You know, you were talking to me in the same manner that a general, Jim Mattis, for instance, former defense secretary spoke to me

just this week, talking about how we must, despite our differences, keep talking.


Stop being, you know, divided into tribal extreme groups and treating everybody like an enemy. And you're seeing it from a very human, personal,

cultural view as well.

KIDJO: We tend to forget what is really essential, the core of who we are as human beings. And we get distracted by people's misery. I don't live

in your life. The choices you make, if you're not happy with them, change them. Don't blame me for it. My skin color doesn't have to come to the

plate. We need to talk to each other. I mean, it's essential.

AMANPOUR: You are talking about all of this from your own perspective as growing up in Africa under this terrible dictatorship and escaping it. But

now, we are here in 2019 in the United States or in Great Britain, where you have just finished doing the proms or other parts of Europe where this

kind of tribalization, this kind of political hatred is really just driving societies and cultures apart. The racism that we see here in the United

States overtly.

Just talk to me a little bit about what you're noticing now here in our world, in the free world today.

KIDJO: I think it's a lot of ignorance, one, and it's a lot of frustration. When globalization -- we start talking about globalizers, I

always say this, globalization doesn't mean we all have to think the same and we all have to look the same. Because we are a unique. Even though we

belong to the same human family, we don't think the same way.

In the same family, brothers and sisters with the same education don't have the same take on every -- on the situation they are facing. So, we are

here now and what I hear and it started like way before, I mean, it started 10, 15 years ago.

When people would come to me, young Africans and young from around the world, even in America here, telling me I was doing a signing at

(INAUDIBLE) for my book and a couple of young kids come to me, white kids, not -- I mean, we can't say black are mad, they have reason to -- we have

reason to be mad here, telling me we're going to do a revolution, we're going to break everything.

We're going to destroy everything. I said, come again? You come to my signing to tell me that? So, you don't know the person that I am? I'm not

for chaos. I'm for construction. I can understand you guys are angry. I can understand any reason you have to say this. But if you don't think

about building a better society, you are the great loser because you are the young. You're going to be the one that pay the cost of the chaos you

want to create.

AMANPOUR: So, don't meet anger with anger --


AMANPOUR: -- meet it with a constructive --

KIDJO: Conversation.

AMANPOUR: -- conversation.

KIDJO: And -- OK.

AMANPOUR: Let's play then a little clip from Celia Cruz, the cover album that you've been doing.




AMANPOUR: So, I hear you singing with me as we play that. Come on, belt it out again.


AMANPOUR: So, that's one of her most famous and popular song and it roughly translates, it means, life is carnival.


AMANPOUR: And she's country of the greatest salsa stars. So, what is it about her? Why did you decide it? How did she first come into your life?

KIDJO: Well, for me, salsa has always been a huge music scene in Africa, everywhere. There's no one artist today -- Youssou N'Dour started with

salsa. (INAUDIBLE). All of them. All of the guy that started with salsa. So for me --

AMANPOUR: And it's usually guys.

KIDJO: It's only guys. That's what I said. Salsa is a male-dominated form of art. So, for me, OK, as a girl, I'm OK. This music you can't

touch because it's only guys that play it. So, comes Celia. And I'm like, what? What up? She walks on the stairs, she goes, (INAUDIBLE). I say,

hey, guys. She's here to settle. You're going to learn something right now.

And her song, "Quimbara," is a lesson of what a voice can be. She used her voice as in these percussive instruments and no one, I said no on until

today can sing like Celia. It's amazing that we have the same kind of range because most of her song I don't touch. I don't change the key of

the song. And from that point on, for me, it becomes clear as a young girl that success or failure has no gender.

And if you don't believe in yourself, we're talking about women leadership. What would that leadership be? Are we always going to be when we put in

front of choosing something where it's out of our realm, we're going to back and say, can I do this?


I'm saying no.

I say said no to every young girl and every woman out there. You are offered a chance, an opportunity, take it. Learn while you're doing it.

Don't think back twice.

That's what I learned from Celia.

AMANPOUR: And just let's go back to when you were younger, when she first came into your consciousness.

I think you had a bet with one of your childhood friends that she would, in fact, emerge onto the stage. Tell me about the homework bet.


The thing is, it's a sort of -- I saw the poster and I said to my friends, first, a woman singing salsa coming to sing. And I go, yes, smarty-pants,

you always know everything. A woman singing salsa? Where do you come from?

I'm like -- I'm just saying, that's it, it's not going to happen. She's going to be a backing singer. I said, you want to take a bet? And if it's

a front-runner, you do my homework for six months in and out. The math, I give it to you. I hate that.

And when she walk on stage, before she came in, they have 15 minutes the guys singing. And they are looking at me like, you see, you see? You're

going to lose. I said, are you talking to me?

And I was there praying God. I say, God, please, let her come and be a front-runner. And she came out, and I'm like...

AMANPOUR: Six months free homework.

KIDJO: Yes. You have it.

AMANPOUR: Because Celia Cruz was the lead singer.

KIDJO: Absolutely.

AMANPOUR: And that was the first you had seen of that in Africa.

KIDJO: Salsa female singer, absolutely, the first African salsa -- I mean, Afros-Cuban, because what I love about Celia is that she never shied away

of singing the song that came to Cuba with the slaves.

She always paid tribute to all of those gods, those origins. And for me, it's -- I was like, how come she knows all this? And it's great.

AMANPOUR: Well, talk about that.

We're in the United States right now. You have mentioned the origins, the slave music that she never, you know, hid and always used. And you sing a

lot about dark subjects as well, with the joyful tone that you have.

But, look, it is 400 years since 1619, since the first slaves were brought over here. Reflect on that, but also on how you have really wanted to

bring Afro music, the Afro beat into a wider world, and you don't like the idea of world music, how it's called.

KIDJO: I hate that.

AMANPOUR: I mean, you won your Grammys, but in the world category. What does that mean today?

KIDJO: Well, it means that we haven't learned yet that every music that we do today comes from Africa.

We like it or not, that's just the simple fact and truth of it. It is true. Everywhere you turn, everywhere I turn as a musician, I always find

my continent in it, and especially my country.

Blues comes from the songs of the slave. The blue note has been created by the Africans. I mean, jazz has been created by African descendants.

So, for me, music is just what we are, the mixture that we are from the beginning. As a human being, we are mixed. There is no such a thing as a

pure race. And I don't understand white supremacists, because supremacy has to be a higher level of morality, a higher standard in life.

It cannot be killing people. It cannot be hating people, because you're talking about supremacy and hate. Those things don't go together. So, for

me, Africans that came here, the African-American didn't migrate here, like the Irish, like any other people. They had been forced to come here.

They have created the wealth of this country and they have created the wealth of Europe. That's slavery. Today, we don't want to talk about it.

We blame Africans for slavery. Of course it comes as a business proposal to the king and the thought it was going to be a good thing, the lie that

had been told to them, they bought the lie, and here we are today.

But to make a long story short, I think we ought to always think about the fact that the genesis of the crime committed for the rich country to comes

is in the blood and sweat of African people.

And that motive of slavery is also implemented in business, because we Africans are not free. They say we have independence. Which independence

are you talking about? The raw material we have in our country, we don't define the price of the raw material.

The price of oil is not decided by the leaders of Africa. We have the wealth, but the world is in the hand of the Westerners so far, with, of

course, the help of our leaders that just really facilitated the job for them.

So, for me, as a musician, what I say to people is, we that come from that painful story, how do we create a different narrative? How do we show the

world that, despite all the wrong that people have done to us, we are still human beings and we are still willing to create bonds between us?


If we don't have the choice, we cannot live without each other. It does not matter what skin color you have. We have to live together. And it's

something that I learn every day, especially when, as a UNICEF goodwill ambassador, we go to villages, and you see all those kids suffering.

When you face a child soldier, when you face a teenager that had been raped constantly in the conflict, and you have no words to touch them, and you

start singing, and you see a smile, that's the power of music.

And it's something that makes me humble, makes me come to the core of it and say, as a human being, what do I have to bring to the table?

AMANPOUR: Well, what you have brought to the table is not just your music, but, very famously, at this G7 that just happened in France, you were

there, and you got all the countries to put hundreds of millions of dollars into a fund to pay it forward, so to speak, to help African female


I mean, that must have been pretty tough.

KIDJO: It was tough. It was not easy to do.

But when I met the women of the market in my country, and half-an-hour into the meeting, they were already falling asleep in the morning. And I say,

how can I help? What are your issues? What is the problem?

And they told me microcredit is not the goal, is not that thing that's going to solve our problem. The women in the market, they said to me,

every time we take a loan, we spend all of our energy to pay that loan. And when we finish, we find ourselves within two weeks that we need another

loan, because we don't have enough money aside to invest and diversify our business and to put money aside to send our kids to school.

That's when I say, we have to fiend a solution to that. So I spoke about this issue to the President Macron of France, and he asked me, what is

needed? I said, that's where we can transform Africa.

The women of the market, every year around the continent, we miss $2.5 trillion that they produce that is nowhere to find. And what is it also

that touches me is that those women are the one whose children are dying at sea. You bring a child to this world. You try to raise them right. You

try to give them a future.

And everywhere around the world, everything that is done, even though we send them to school, telling them school, education is going to give you a

future, around it, all the decision-taking around the world is taking away their future.

And not only become a political point -- talking point in Europe, for all those racist people that does not understand that they are living the life

they are living due to us living in poverty.

And I think it's about time we start thinking about how we share the wealth of this world.

AMANPOUR: So, what keeps you optimistic?

KIDJO: The strength and the resilience of the people around the world, white, black, yellow, red, because poverty is in this country, too.

I think we need really to come to realize that, if we are not each other's keeper, we lose everything. There is not other life out there. There is

not another ecosystem as this one on this Earth. If we messed it up rich, poor, yellow, black, whatever color you call yourself, whatever language

you speak, Mother Nature don't know that, and death don't know.

When death comes knocking, you can't tell death, yes, wait a minute, I have to go count my billions. You're gone.


AMANPOUR: On that note, Angelique Kidjo, thank you so much for joining us.

KIDJO: It's always a pleasure to be with you, Christiane.

AMANPOUR: Anything optimistic to close on?

KIDJO: Always.


KIDJO: Come on. Live up.

AMANPOUR: It's really good. It's really good. It makes us all wake up and feel happy and optimistic, despite the serious issues that we have to

deal with.

Angelique, thank you very much.

KIDJO: You're welcome.

AMANPOUR: Our next guest wants us all to connect more.

Marc Brackett is an emotional scientist, a Yale professor, and he thinks emotional intelligence skills should be taught from an early age.

With mental health issues rising exponentially, his work has never been more pressing, and he spoke to our Michel Martin about his new book,

"Permission to Feel," and how he spent years learning how to do just that.


MICHEL MARTIN, CORRESPONDENT, NPR: Marc Brackett, thank you so much for talking with us.


MARTIN: The thing about this book that I like is that you make it sound so simple, but it really isn't.

I guess I will start with the title, which is, why do we need permission to feel?

BRACKETT: You know, permission to feel is a -- it's an important term for me, because, as a child, I didn't have that permission.

I had a tough childhood, and nobody asked me to talk about my feelings. Nobody saw what was going on for me, even though it was pretty clear. And

so I chose that title because I felt that people have to be given that permission.

And especially adults who are raising kids and teachers who are teaching kids, we need to create context where children have the permission to

experience all emotions and where they have the permission to express them.


MARTIN: And you talk about it in the book, but do you mind sharing here, what is it that led to that lightbulb moment for you? How did you come to

understand how important it is to be given permission to feel?

BRACKETT: Well, as a child, I had an abuse situation. I also was bullied pretty horrifically, and I was very unhappy. And I was a poor student in


And, somehow, I knew I was smart, but I just couldn't perform well academically. I had two parents who loved me dearly, but my mom was a very

anxious woman, so when I would even talk to her about my bullying, she might say, ah, oh, my goodness, honey, don't tell me. I will have a


And my father was also a great man, but he was like, son, you have got to toughen up.

So, I learned very quickly as a kid, you know what? Mom's going to have a breakdown if I tell her how I'm feeling, and dad's going to just keep on

telling me to toughen up.

But there was some wizard that came into my life, and his name was uncle Marvin. And...

MARTIN: He really is your uncle.

BRACKETT: He really is my uncle. And he was an interesting character because he was a middle school teacher by day and a band leader at a

Catskill Mountain hotel by night.

And uncle Marvin was developing a program to teach kids about feelings through his social studies class, and he was getting a master's degree when

I was in my middle school years.

I will just never forget, you know, one day he just said, you know, how are you feeling? And then he just paused, and his facial expression, his body

language was so open. And I knew it was a time to just tell him how I really felt, which was angry, scared. The list goes on. And then he just

said, well, what can we do about it?

It wasn't, what can you do about it? It was, what can we do about it? And that to me was the first adult who heard me and the first adult who

listened to me and was there with unconditional love and support.

MARTIN: I don't want to glide past what you said, an abuse situation. This is a terrible situation. You were abused. The person who abused you

was abusing other people.

BRACKETT: Correct.

MARTIN: I hope this person was brought to justice at some point, was held accountable for his conduct.

BRACKETT: Well, I was the person responsible for that.

And you would think that would be something positive, which it was to some extent. But, unfortunately, growing up where I was in New Jersey in the

1980s, when this happened, the block turned against our family, because we outed the pedophile.

And it was quite scary for me, because parents were telling their kids not to play with me. I was on public television, actually, when I was 11 years

old talking about this, which just kind of a deja vu moment for me, because I think it was inappropriate for me to be on TV at 11 disclosing my abuse


MARTIN: I'm sorry for that.


Well, the ramifications, you know, were that, you know, stay away from Marc. You know, he's damaged goods. But now it's 39 years later, and look

what I'm getting to do.

MARTIN: The reason I'm thinking about that, though, is that -- forgive me -- this isn't when dinosaurs walked the earth. I mean, it's not like

people didn't understand that there was a language of feelings, that feelings matter, that the abuse of a child matters, that a kid should have

an opportunity to express himself.

And I'm just curious, like, why has it taken so long for people to understand that this matters?

BRACKETT: Because people in general see emotions and feelings as weak, like, a man having shame, a man feeling fear, right?

You know, it reminds me recently, when I was giving a presentation, a father who heard me speak about my childhood said, I can't believe how much

you talk about your childhood and your bullying. Like, I would never let my son know I was bullied, because he would think I was weak.

And, you know, that's eye-opening, you know? And what I said to him was, well, what if your son is being bullied, right, but you're sending messages

to him that say, I'm not here to listen to you? You know, what would that mean? How would that make you feel as a dad to your child?

MARTIN: One of the arguments that you make, it's just that this isn't just about abuse situations, as you put it.

BRACKETT: No, not at all.

MARTIN: This is about a skill that you think people need to learn. Can you talk more about that?

BRACKETT: These are life skills.

So, you know, yes, I had a traumatic childhood that led me to this path. I also want to just say that I feel blessed that I had that uncle. You know,

I got involved in the martial arts, which was a big part of my life. I majored in psychology. I went for therapy. Like, I spent a lot of time

giving myself permission to feel.

But putting that aside for a moment, you know, just from the -- life is saturated we motion. The moment we wake up, you know, we think about our

workplace, and we say, do I want to go to work today? Do I not want to go to work today?

The commute. You know, meeting one, meeting two, meeting three. Life is just filled with emotion.

And what we know from our research is that emotions drive five really big things. Our attention, right? So, how we feel drives where our brains pay



The second is decision-making. Think about that. How you feel influences your choices and your judgments, from what you eat, to what you buy, to how

nice you are or not nice you are to somebody.

The third is the quality of our relationships. How you feel -- right, if you're feeling down and depressed, you're probably not going to want to

approach the world. But when you're feeling inspired and connected, you're going to want to move forward.

The fourth is mental health and physical health. And, finally, something that I think everyone should care about, which is performance in school and

work and creativity. So, emotions are responsible and behind almost everything we do in life.

MARTIN: I would make an argument that all those things are all things everybody should care about, like relationships, and, you know...

BRACKETT: Exactly.

MARTIN: ... social interactions and things of that sort.


And so people don't lose their jobs because of their abilities in the cognitive area usually, right? It's because of their inability to

regulate. Right?

Think about your life in terms of the people who you have liked to work with and didn't like to work with. Oftentimes, it's the people who just

don't have the skills to manage their feelings.

MARTIN: So, where do you want us to start in thinking about this?

BRACKETT: Wow. I want us to start maybe in utero?



BRACKETT: I'm serious, though. How moms and dads experience the world affects, you know, the fetus.

But, truthfully, my work is in schools and in workplaces. So I believe that everyone deserves an emotion education. It just -- it needs to be

part of the way we think about education, from preschool to high school to college, to becoming a lawyer, doctor, teacher, whatever your profession


MARTIN: So, you say -- say that again. You say everybody deserves an emotion education.

BRACKETT: That's correct.

MARTIN: OK, now, that's connected to this idea of emotional intelligence, right, isn't it?


MARTIN: Could you just talk a little bit more about what that is? This is a term that I think a lot of people have heard for quite some time, in



MARTIN: So, what is it exactly?

BRACKETT: We see emotional intelligence as a set of skills that help us to use our emotions wisely.

So it starts off with recognizing emotions, right? Am I aware of how I'm feeling? Am I aware how you're feeling? And then the question is, do I

know where that feeling came from? Is it what I said? Is it what I did? Is it from a memory? Like, what's causing my feelings?

The third is, what's the exact feeling? What's the precise word? For example, in the angry category, am I peeved, am I angry, or am I enraged?

And the sad family, am I down, am I disappointed, or am I hopeless? And in the happy family, am I content, or am I happy or am I ecstatic?

That's the first set of skills we call the RUL -- RULER, our acronym, which helps make meaning out of our own and other people's emotional lives.

Then we have the E and the R, which is expressing and regulating emotion. That has to do with what we do with our feelings. So, do I have the

permission to be my authentic, true self with you? Can I express my feelings at home, at school, at work?

And do I know how to express them in a way that gets my needs met, that helps other people? And then, finally, I think the big, big one is

regulation of emotion.

So, what are the strategies that I use to prevent unwanted feelings, to reduce the difficult ones, or even to create the ones that I want to have

in life?

MARTIN: People are very, I think, aware of wanting kids to regulate their emotions. I mean, that's kind of what school is all about, right? Sit

still, don't throw your pencil at this other kid who made you mad, that kind of thing.


MARTIN: But I think what I hear you saying is, is that we are very aware of wanting kids to regulate their emotions, but we don't tell them how to

do it.

Why is that?

BRACKETT: Because the adults or raising and teaching kids have not had an adequate emotion education.

So, you know, think about that. When we're frustrated and overwhelmed as teachers, as parents, calm down, sit down, be still. And that's not being

a great role model, right? You can't yell at someone to calm down. It doesn't really make much sense.

And I think, importantly, what we also forget is that emotions are, what we like to say, co-regulated. Think about this. In a classroom, in a home,

in a workplace, right, how -- as the manager, as the leader, if I walk into a -- I have a team of 50 in my center.

If I walk into a meeting, be like, all right, we have get to write another grant, it's going to bring -- you know, it's going to change the mood. So

emotions are co-regulated, right? We're in relationships most of our day.

MARTIN: You know, one of the things that's gotten a lot of attention in recent years is just how stressed out adolescents are -- and kids, too, not

just adolescents.

And I just want -- some of the data. In 2017, about 8 percent of adolescents aged 12 to 17 and 25 percent of young adults describe

themselves as current users of illicit drugs. The number of incidents of bullying and harassment in the United States in K-12 schools -- this is

according to the Anti-Defamation League -- doubled each year between 2015 and 2017.


Internationally, this is an issue. Apparently, depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide.

So, do you feel that your area of study, emotional intelligence, is also a factor here in some of these issues that we are describing?

BRACKETT: I think it says why we need these skills more than ever, you know?

And we don't think of emotional intelligence as being an individual skill. This is a skill that is about, yes, the individual, I need to regulate when

I'm by myself in the airport, and I'm stressed out and overwhelmed. But I also need these strategies with my partner, with my family. I need them at


And, you know, the truth is, is that communities and organizations have feelings. So, if you are a leader of a company -- I give an example. I

was at a big financial company here in New York City, and one of the top executives, you know, he heard me speak. And he's like, you know, this is

kind of interesting, but, you know, I don't need this training.

I said, what do you mean? He's like, well, look at me. I'm the boss. Like, I can do whatever I want. But maybe I will have you train the people

who work for me, because then they will have skills to deal with me.

MARTIN: How do you respond to that, though? I mean, what he's saying is true, right? He doesn't care how he makes other people feel, right? Am I


BRACKETT: Well, he probably doesn't, but what he doesn't realize is that the people who work for him are going to have feelings.

And how they feel is going to drive their decision-making, the quality of their work, how much time they spend on social media vs. doing their work.

So, maybe if he spent more time thinking about how people felt, actually, the company would do even better than it's doing.

MARTIN: Hmm, OK. So maybe extend that a little further. Make the business case for why people should care.

BRACKETT: We did a national study in our center with 15,000 people across the work force, from people who work in farming to people who work in


And what we found was that people who work for an emotionally intelligent, as opposed to an emotionally unintelligent supervisor have different lives

at work.

Just to give you one example. Feeling inspiration, which is an important thing probably to feel at work, there was a 50 percent difference in

organizations -- or for people, I should say, when they worked for someone who is high vs. low in emotional intelligence.

Creativity was significantly different when you work for someone who's high in emotional intelligence, your burnout levels, your stress levels, your

intentions to leave your profession.

So, turnover has a high cost to organizations. And so, if how you feel is determined by the leadership's emotional intelligence, and there's greater

turnover and tensions when there's a leader who is low in emotional intelligence, my hunch is that they should read my book and learn these

skills, because it's going to make a difference.


MARTIN: And what about kids? Kids can't leave the institution, by and large, unless they really act out. I mean, they're kind of captured,


So, talk about kids. Like, why does it matter that kids learn these skills?


MARTIN: And the people teaching those kids?

BRACKETT: Because, you know, emotions are the drivers of kids' attention in school, you know?

People say things like, we only learn what we care about. So, if we don't infuse emotion into the learning process and create that engagement, guess

what? Students are going to get bored. They're going to get distracted. That's when bullying happens. That's when students drift off, you know,

into disengagement.

So, I think, also, what you're getting at is this idea of the climate of a classroom. So, we have done research on that, where we have literally

videotaped classrooms and looked at the interactions between teachers and students. And what we find is that classrooms where there are teachers who

are more emotionally skilled have students who are better learners, there is less bullying, there is greater academic achievement.

MARTIN: Can you just give us a couple of tips about how you can start giving yourself permission to feel, so that you can be a more inspiring

leader or teacher or be a more inspired student?

BRACKETT: I think you're saying it. That first thing that I talk about in my book is just giving yourself that permission, that -- recognize that

emotions matter, that they're valuable sources of information.

The second thing is -- as I talk about in the book, is this idea of being an emotional scientist vs. an emotion judge. So, for example, are you open

to the experience of all emotions? Are you open to other people's feelings? Are you open to learning new strategies to help you be better

managed, to help you regulate feelings better?

The scientist is open. The judge says, you know what, this is who I am, get over it. So, we're trying to get people to be more line scientists

than judges.

And then the third is, recognize that this is a lifelong journey, that you're not going to be perfect. And I think the big one is just practice

regulating. Like, learn new strategies.

And most people don't even -- I didn't know what they were until I was a graduate student. So, for example, engaging in more positive self-talk

than negative self-talk. Catch yourself. Like, wait a minute. I'm like - - the other day, for example, I was working out in the morning.


And I said, Marc, you're going to be positive. And then I was looking at - - I'm like oh, God, your stomach. And then I looked at my legs. They're so white.


BRACKETT: And I, like, trashed myself.



MARTIN: Oh, my goodness.


And I was like, wait a minute, Marc. Like, you -- like, that is not helpful. And it's like, just catch yourself when you're doing that

negative talk and say, all right, how can I think about this in a different way? What's a different story that I can tell myself?

MARTIN: Marc Brackett, thank you so much for talking with us.

BRACKETT: My pleasure.

MARTIN: And how do you feel now?

BRACKETT: I feel relieved.



MARTIN: Good. Me, too.


AMANPOUR: And that's it from us for now. Thanks for watching this special edition of AMANPOUR.

And, remember, you can always listen to our podcast, see us online at, and follow me on Instagram and Twitter.

Goodbye from London.