Edition: U.S. | Arabic | Set Pref
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
"What a ridiculous form of locomotion flying is..."
I felt sorry for JetBlue passengers in the United States who were horribly delayed when the airline incompetently handled the recent dreadful weather in the North East USA. JetBlue failed to cancel flights, kept passengers imprisoned on planes for hours and all in all behaved like a low cost carrier!

It follows several other incidents where passengers have borne the brunt of bad airline management during bad weather. In Dallas, American Airlines kept passengers on board a grounded plane for eight hours when their flight was delayed. And at London Heathrow thousands of passengers were stranded at the airport because of fog!

These incidents reminded me of that magnificent film “The V.I.Ps” made in 1963. I watched it again to remind myself of how good air travel used to be. The film is the tale of high-profile passengers who are delayed because of fog at London Airport. One passenger has to be out the country by midnight for tax reasons, another (Elizabeth Taylor!) is eloping with her lover, while a businessman must get to New York to save his company.

It is the way airline, BOAC, supposedly handles the delay that amused me. They make proper lunch provision in the restaurant – no measly vouchers! Then when that becomes an overnight stay they make suitable hotel reservations for passengers. Imagine that! These days it is more likely to be a shrug of the shoulders and a snarling: “Weather delays, mate. Not our fault. You’re on your own!”

To its credit, JetBlue has done a mega mea culpa and issued a passengers’ Bill of Rights setting out how it will deal with bad delays in the future. The CEO David Neeleman must be congratulated for being open, honest in making his apology and for and making the first move. But it is not enough.

With passengers up in arms, the U.S. Congress seems ready to act with plans to get rid of the current voluntary code of conduct and legislate compensation for delays, denied boarding and lost luggage.

It will end in tears and no benefit to the passenger. Why?

Because in Europe there has been such a Bill of Rights setting out rules for delays and denied boarding since 2005. It has not been a great success. The get-out clause is that the airlines only have to pay if the delay is their fault or within their control or not as a result of “extraordinary circumstances” (bad weather, air traffic control delays, technical faults – whoops - extraordinary circumstances. Sorry, no compensation!)

The reality is that the airlines have behaved so shabbily in recent years that there is no sympathy for their (correct) plea that sometimes circumstances are outside their control, so why should they pay?

Pah! We want revenge for those hours spent sitting in lounges because they have overscheduled the airline. Or worse, time spent on planes waiting for arrival gates to become free. We are sick and tired of the “sorry, not our fault” attitude and we want the airline to suffer like we have had to! We have had enough.

I think the whole thing can be summed up by the words of the Duchess of Brighton in the “The V.I.Ps” movie: “What a ridiculous form of locomotion flying is. They tie you into your seat and tell you you’re going. Then they make hair raising noises with the engines. Then they untie you and tell you you’re not going at all. Can you imagine the Queen Mary behaving like that?”

Quite, your Grace, quite!
Hi Richard

Jet Blue's Passenger Bill of Rights (PBOR) has a term Controllable Irregularities which (so far) they have refused to define. A big get out clause if ever I saw one.

Many blogs have picked up on that point (eg http://theglobaltraveller.blogspot.com).

As you say, the EU regulation has a similar get out clause. Experience to date has not been encouraging even with the ability to appeal. How can an airline specific PBOR without regulatory backing or any appeals process hope to provide reassurance, other than to the uninformed?

But, some of the suggested legislative PBORs are just as bad. Requiring compensation for the most minor of delays and inconveniences, which if implemented must lead to higher costs and less choice.

I hope a sensible middle ground can be found.
Hi Richard! I know you're a busy man but when the foreign minister of Sweden can blog about 5 times a day...surely you can too?
http://carlbildt.wordpress.com/

Please come back. I enjoy your eloquent writing.

Best regards,
Annika
Just posted a comment (March 4) and got the following message:

"Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated by CNN and will not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted."

Considering there are no comments posted in about a week, I find this a little "funny". Again, you may wanna check out the Swedish foreign ministers blog. He has around 100 comments on each item. And they are not "censored", alternatively he is online all the time.

BR, Annika
Hi Richard, travelling these days is not what it used to be, and the airlines are quick to blame the weather, air traffic controllers and the like for delays, and very few airlines try to accommodate the customers. Singapore Airlines is the exception, they are proactive when there is a dealy. At the check in counter in Frankfurt there was an announcement and a letter to the passengers apologising because the flight to Singapore was going to be approx. 2 1/2 delayes due to late arrival of the aircraft. Not only did they inform us they had also made arrangements for all passengers to have a meal at a restaurant in the departure area. I have not experience such service in a long time. At the end of the day it is up to the airlines to service their customers, no law is likely to be an incentive for the airlines to look after their clients - it all comes down to how important the airlines think their customer is for them. Luckily there are choices and I know which airline I like to fly.
ABOUT THIS BLOG
CNN International anchor Richard Quest shares his thoughts and opinions on the world of business travel.
Business Traveller
QUEST'S BEST
ABTN
Fare Compare
Flying Fish
Flyer Talk
All CNN.com Blogs
SUBSCRIBE
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  Asia  |  Europe  |  U.S.  |  World  |  World Business  |  Technology  |  Entertainment  |  World Sport  |  Travel
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  RSS Feeds  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  Site Map
© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.