Au pair defense lawyers argue for lesser charge
November 4, 1997
Web posted at: 5:34 p.m. EST (2234 GMT)
Latest developments:
CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts (CNN) -- Lawyers for 19-year-old British au pair Louise Woodward asked Judge Hiller Zobel on Tuesday to undo the jury's
second-degree murder verdict. Citing autopsy photos they say they received too late during Woodward's trial, defense attorneys asked the judge to take one of three actions: let Woodward go free, reduce her murder conviction to manslaughter or order a new
trial.
Excerpts from arguments:
|
Prosecutors, who asked the judge to take no action, maintain
that last week's conviction in the death of
8-month-old Matthew Eappen was proper. They allege Woodward
caused a fatal skull fracture by shaking and slamming the
child in a fit of rage last February.
Zobel, who has 120 days to rule, said his decision could come
as early as Wednesday. He will not announce it in open court; the decision will be distributed
by the courthouse both to the media and law-related Web sites.
Zobel received written arguments in the case on Monday and
listened to both sides give oral arguments Tuesday.
Autopsy photos debated
As the hearing got under way, defense attorney Barry Scheck
said "unrefuted and overwhelming scientific evidence" proved
Woodward's innocence in the infant's death.
|
Judge Zobel's Options:
|
- Overturn verdict
- Reduce charge to manslaughter
- Grant a new trial
- Do nothing
|
|
Scheck focused on autopsy photos he said were unfairly
introduced near the end of the trial by the prosecution --
too late, he said, for the defense to question experts about
them.
He said the pictures more clearly showed tissue growth around
the perimeter of the injured area, which could indicate the
baby was hurt before February 4, the day Woodward called an
emergency number to say Matthew was having trouble
breathing. The child died five days later.
But prosecutor Martha Coakley said there was nothing in the
photos or any other evidence that would prove the defense
claim that Eappen died of an old injury. "The weight of the
evidence ... is against offering a new trial," she said.
Lead prosecutor Gerard Leone Jr. urged the judge to let the
jury's verdict stand. "You should not substitute your
judgment for the judgment of the jury, because the defendant
had a fair trial," he said.
Defense lawyer acknowledges possible 'mistake'
Leone also noted that the defense -- in asking for
consideration of a manslaughter conviction -- was proposing
an option it had rejected during the trial. "(Woodward)
should not be allowed to sample the jury's verdict and then
.... move for a reduction of the very charge that she
rejected."
Defense attorney Harvey Silverglate acknowledged that the
strategy of keeping the jury from considering manslaughter
"can be seen as a mistake." In hindsight, he said, "by any
definition, the evidence in this case could fit into
manslaughter."
A manslaughter verdict would mean a sentence of up to 20
years; with time served, Woodward could be released
immediately. The second-degree murder conviction carries a
mandatory sentence of life with possibility of parole only
after 15 years.
Woodward did not attend Thursday's hearing. She remained at
the state prison in Framingham, Massachusetts. In court her
parents sat in the front row wearing yellow ribbons
symbolizing their demand that their daughter be allowed to go
home.
At the other end of the front row of spectators sat Deborah
Eappen, the dead baby's mother. She wore a pin made to look like
a caterpillar, Matthew's favorite toy.
Outside the courthouse, protesters held signs with messages
such as "Send Louise Home Free," "Correct This Injustice" and
"Louise was Lynched."
A handful of people outside the courthouse said they felt the
jury reached the correct verdict in the case.
Correspondent Gary Tuchman
contributed to this report.