Facebook fuses emotion to its anti-bullying efforts

 Facebook is changing how offensive or bullying content is reported, the company announced Wednesday.

Story highlights

  • Facebook adds tools to help adolescents deal with cyberbullying
  • Changes are the result of research done with Yale and Columbia Universities
  • Instead of reporting a photo, users are pushed to ask the person who posted it to take it down
Communication on Facebook started with the simple, emotionally vague "poke."
Over the past eight years, many features have been added to the social network, multiplying the ways people can interact with each other. You can chat and message someone, tag them in a photo or a post, check them into a location, post on their timeline or mention them in your own posts.
A negative side effect of all these exchanges is that the potential for miscommunications and conflicts has also boomed, ranging from an adult not liking how they look in a tagged photo to cyberbullying among teenagers.
To make it easier to catch and resolve volatile situations early on, Facebook is changing how content is reported, the company announced Wednesday. It's giving users tools to better communicate their feelings and handle conflicts themselves. The changes are the result of collaborations with Yale, Columbia and Berkeley that involved months of research and focus groups with kids, teachers and clinical psychologists.
The first change is specifically for 13- and 14-year-olds (you have to be at least 13 to sign up for a Facebook account). If a boy in that age range wants to report a mean or threatening post or image a schoolmate has put on Facebook, he can click "This post is a problem" (a new phrase chosen to replace the stiff "Report") and go through a series of casually worded questions to determine what kind of issue he's having and how serious it is. There's even a grid for ranking his emotions.
Teen sues bullies for fake Facebook page
Teen sues bullies for fake Facebook page


    Teen sues bullies for fake Facebook page


Teen sues bullies for fake Facebook page 02:43
Once he finishes the questions, a list of suggested actions is generated based on how pressing his complaint is. If the boy is more annoyed than than fearful, he might choose to send a pre-written message to the other person saying that the post makes him uncomfortable. If he is afraid, he will be prompted to get help from a trusted friend or adult. There are links to catch anyone who may be feeling suicidal and direct them to professionals and Facebook's own suicide chat hotline.
"We feel it is important that Facbook provide encouragement for kids to seek out their own support network," said Robin Stern, a psychoanalyst from Columbia University who worked on the project. "The children tell us they are spending hours online... they are living their lives with Facebook on in the background."
Kids aren't the only ones who need a little help communicating their feelings on the Internet. Facebook looked at photos that are reported for removal by all ages, flagged for offenses like being pornographic, containing hate speech or depicting drug use. When they started to dig in, the team noticed images were frequently being flagged for more personal reasons -- someone didn't like how they looked in the photo, was embarrassed their boss could see them dancing on a table or maybe was just trying to wipe away evidence of an old romance.
Usually when a photo is reported for violating community standards, it goes to a Facebook employee who has to determine what steps to take. That adds up a lot of requests. By expanding the options and directing people to ask the person who posted a photo to take it down, Facebook is putting its members in charge of their own issues and saving itself some resources as a bonus.
"How do you build in emotion, this ancient part of human nature, in to the Facebook site?" asked Dacher Keltner, director of the Social Interaction Laboratory at Berkeley.
Keltner's team worked with Facebook to add some feeling to the process, customizing the stock requests based on the reason for wanting the photo removed and how important it was to the offended party that it come down. The wording was made more polite and the recipient given pre-writen answers to choose from too, opening up a dialog between the two sides.
The changes aren't the most major Facebook has made, or even the most noticeable tweaks to roll out this week. But the shifts show the company is paying careful attention to the nuanced ways people communicate emotions on the social network.
And by researching, changing wording and tracking response rates, it is also figuring out how to better engage its users. The motive was good, conflict resolution and helping kids, but the method could also have handy applications for delivering paid content.
"Language really matters and design really matters for this stuff," said Jake Brill, a Facebook product manager. "The smallest change can have a really notable impact."
The changes have been available to many Facebook users as part of a test period and are rolling out to all U.S. members this week. Early statistics are promising: The rate of people completing the questionnaire when untagging an image has jumped from 48% to 78%. The team hopes to expand the program to other languages and countries but only after carefully recalibrating the wording for those cultures.
The results of the studies were presented Wednesday (which was Facebook Compassion Research Day) in Menlo Park, California. The company's anti-cyberbullying push was started shortly after the Tyler Clementi suicide, though Facebook says it wasn't inspired by a single event.