PETERSBURG, RUSSIA - SEPTEMBER 06: In this handout image provided by Host Photo Agency, Russian President Vladimir Putin attends the G20 Summit on September 6, 2013 in St. Petersburg, Russia. Leaders of the G20 nations made progress on tightening up on multinational company tax avoidance, but remain divided over the Syrian conflict as they enter the final day of the Russian summit. (Photo by Iliya Pitalev/Host Photo Agency via Getty Images)
Putin makes his case in an op-ed
02:06 - Source: CNN

Story highlights

NEW: Putin's op-ed is "irrelevant" and he "needs to deliver" on Syria, U.S. official says

NEW: U.S.-funded weapons began reaching Syrian rebels 2 weeks ago, official says

In a New York Times op-ed, Putin says striking Syria will hurt the region and world

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry will meet with Russian counterpart Thursday

Washington CNN  — 

Hours before the top diplomats from his nation and the United States begin a high-stakes meeting, Russian President Vladimir Putin took to The New York Times to argue against military intervention in Syria and jab his U.S. counterpart.

Using an op-ed “to speak directly to the American people and their political leaders … at a time of insufficient communication between our societies,” Putin made a case much like U.S. President Barack Obama did Tuesday night – although their arguments could hardly have been more different.

Striking Syria would have many negative ramifications, Putin argued in a piece that went online Wednesday night, including the killing of innocent people, spreading violence around the Middle East, clouding diplomatic efforts to address Iran’s nuclear crisis and resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and “unleash(ing) a new wave of terrorism.”

READ: Syria: Key developments

Moreover, the Russian leader said such action without the U.N. Security Council’s approval “would constitute an act of aggression.”

“It could throw the entire system of international law and order out of balance,” Putin said.