What started as a grass-roots movement by UK midwife Amanda Burleigh nearly a decade ago, has recently grabbed the attention of medical doctors around the world. "I wanted to find answers to why so many children, including mine, my friends' and my colleagues' appeared to have additional learning and health needs, especially the boys," said Burleigh. So she started reflecting on her own practice as a midwife.
"I began to question why we were trained to cut the umbilical cord immediately after a baby was born," said Burleigh. "I then started to explore my theory that there must be a link to a child's health based on when the cord is cut." Her curiosity grew into a movement.
Doctors say before the mid-1950s, when many babies were delivered by midwives, most cord cutting happened when the umbilical cord stopped pulsating, around five minutes after birth. Despite a growing body of medical evidence, the exact time frame when the cord should be clamped continues to be a controversial topic among the medical community.
According to the American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists, or ACOG, generally most umbilical cord clamping happens within 15 to 20 seconds after birth. The ACOG does not endorse the practice of delayed cord clamping but rather suggests cord clamping should take place between 30 to 60 seconds after birth, since the ideal timing for cord clamping has yet to be established
Many international health organizations, including the World Health Organization, now recommend umbilical cord clamping
be performed from one to three minutes after birth.
Medical studies have suggested positive effects of delayed cord clamping after birth, including increases in iron stores, blood volume and brain development. In a study released this week in the medical journal JAMA Pediatrics, researchers in Sweden measured the effects of delayed cord clamping
on children past infancy and up to four years, a time frame few doctors have examined.
In the study, a group of 263 healthy Swedish full-term babies were randomly split into two groups. One group had their umbilical cords clamped less than 10 seconds after birth. The cords of the other group were clamped three minutes after birth. The two groups were then monitored for four years. The babies with delayed cord clamping performed modestly better on tests assessing their fine motor skills and social skills. The boys in the study displayed the most statistical improvement. The results, researchers say, showed no difference in overall IQ.
Though the results are not dramatic, researchers involved with the study said this is an important step. "It's incredible to see what a difference an extra three minutes and one-half cup of blood can have on the overall health of a child, especially four years later," said Dr. Ola Andersson, lead author of the study and a pediatrician at the department of women and children's health at Uppsala University in Sweden. "This is very promising, but larger studies are necessary," said Andersson.
At birth an estimated one-third of the baby's blood is in the placenta. Red blood cells contain hemoglobin, a protein molecule, which carries oxygen to body tissues. At birth, the smallest amount of blood could have a big impact on specific aspects of an infant's health, doctors in support of delayed cord clamping say.
Doctors in support of delayed cord clamping say there are also external drivers perpetuating the practice of early cord clamping in developed countries. Early cord clamping causes vital blood cells to remain in the placenta, which could be used and stored in stem cell banks, doctors say.
"It's not a black and white issue," said Dr. David Hutchon, retired obstetrician from the Memorial Hospital in Darlington, United Kingdom. "Though early cord clamping makes it easier to collect and bank cord blood stem cells -- since most of the blood volume remains in the placenta -- in turn, the nutrients from the cord blood are not directly delivered to the infant at birth."
In the past 55 years, early cord clamping h