The town hall was recorded at George Mason University in and broadcast on January 7, 2016
ANDERSON COOPER, CNN: And good evening from George Mason University here in Fairfax, Virginia. We are here tonight to talk about one of the most divisive issues in America today: guns.
Now, protection is enshrined in the Constitution and the Second Amendment, and gun ownership is an integral part of American history and culture.
There are some 30,000 gun deaths in America each year. Two-thirds of them are suicides, one-third of them are homicides. So the question we want to confront tonight is how you find a balance between protecting the rights of American citizens who want to own guns, but preventing guns from getting into the hands of people who shouldn’t have them.
We brought together people here tonight who represent really all sides of the issue: gun owners, gun sellers, people who’ve survived shootings or lost loved ones.
Some here believe that having more guns makes us all safer, and believe the right to bear arms defines us, preserves us from tyranny, and cannot be compromised in any way.
Others here tonight believe just as passionately that more needs to be done to limit the sale of firearms, and we respect all of their views and we want to hear from as many as we can tonight, in the hour ahead.
One voice you will not hear from tonight is the National Rifle Association. They’re the nation’s largest, most influential and powerful gun rights group. We invited them to be here. they – I think their office is just a couple miles away. They declined to take part.
Some of their members are here tonight, though, and we’re very thankful for that, and so are representatives from the National Firearms Retailers Association.
This town hall is not something the White House dreamed up or that the White House organized. CNN approached the White House shortly after the San Bernardino terror attacks with this idea, and we’re pleased that they agreed to participate, and pleased to welcome tonight the president of the United States, Barack Obama.
(APPLAUSE)
Hey, Mr. President. Welcome.
(CROSSTALK)
BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Thank you. Thanks. Thank you. Great to see you.
COOPER: Good to see you.
Let me start. Have you ever owned a gun?
OBAMA: I have never owned a gun. Now, up at Camp David, we’ve got some skeet shooting, so on a fairly regular basis, we get a 12-gauge and – I’m not making any claims about my marksmanship, but.
COOPER: Before you were president, did you ever feel a desire to get a gun, feel the need to get a gun?
OBAMA: You know, I grew up mostly in Hawaii, and other than hunting for wild pig, which they do once in a while, you know, there’s not the popularity of hunting and sportsmanship with guns as much as there are in other parts of the country.
COOPER: Right. I mean, I ask the question because there’s a lot of people out there who don’t trust you, obviously, on the issue of guns. You keep saying you don’t want to take away everybody’s guns, but there’s a lot of people out there tonight watching who don’t believe you. There’s a lot of people in this room who, frankly, don’t believe you.
And it’s not that you don’t really have personal experience having owned a gun, but it’s that things you said – support for Australia’s tough anti-gun policies. They banned semiautomatic assault rifles, they – they banned even shotguns in Australia.
OBAMA: Right.
COOPER: You praised their policies over and over. Back in 2008, you said – you talked about bitter Americans clinging to their guns. Even now, these executive actions tended (ph) to cause a lot of concern among a lot of people.
What can you say to somebody tonight to convince them that you don’t want to take away everybody’s guns? That you’re not coming for their guns?
OBAMA: Well, first of all, Anderson, I think it’s useful to keep in mind, I’ve been, now, president for over seven years, and gun sales don’t seem to have suffered during that time.
COOPER: If anything, actually, you’ve helped.
OBAMA: They’ve – they’ve – gone up. I’ve – been very good for gun manufacturers.
More importantly, let – I’ll tell you a story that, I think, indicates how I see the issue. Back in 2007, 2008, when I was campaigning, I’d leave Chicago, a city which is wonderful – I couldn’t be prouder of my city – but where, every week, there’s a story about a young person getting shot.
Some are gang members, and it’s turf battles. Sometimes it’s innocent victims.
COOPER: Fifty-five people have been shot in Chicago in the last seven days.
OBAMA: Sometimes it’s happened just a few blocks from my house, and I live in a reasonably good neighborhood on the south side of Chicago. So that’s one image. All right? Talking to families who’ve gone through the pain of losing somebody because of violence in Chicago, gun violence.
COOPER: Michelle and I are, then, campaigning out in Iowa, and we’re going to farms, and we’re going to counties, and at one point, Michelle turned to me, and she said, you know, if I was living in a farmhouse where the sheriff’s department is pretty far away and somebody can just turn off the highway and come up to the farm, I’d want to have a shotgun or a rifle to make sure that I was protected and my family was protected. And she was absolutely right.
And so part of the reason I think that this ends up being such a difficult issue is because people occupy different realities. There are a whole bunch of law-abiding citizens who have grown up hunting with their dad or going to the shooting range, and are responsible gun-owners, and then there’s the reality that there are neighborhoods around the country where it is easier for a 12- or a 13-year-old to purchase a gun and cheaper than it is for them to get a book.
COOPER: But what you’re proposing, what you proposed this week, the executive actions, the other things, are they really going to be effective? And I ask this because the vast majority of felons out there – I mean, we can all agree, criminals should not get guns. We want to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. The vast majority of criminals get their guns from – either illegally or for family or friends. So background checks is not something that’s going to affect them, is it?
OBAMA: Well, but that’s not exactly accurate. Look, first of all, it’s important for everybody to understand what I’ve proposed and what I haven’t proposed. What I’ve said consistently throughout my presidency is I respect the Second Amendment, I respect the right to bear arms. I respect people who want a gun for self-protection, for hunting, for sportsmanship.
But all of us can agree that it makes sense to do everything we can to keep guns out of the hands of people who would try to do others harm or to do themselves harm, because every year we’re losing 30,000 people to gun violence. Two-thirds of those are actually suicides. Hundreds of kids under the age of 18 are being shot or shooting themselves, often by accident, many of them under the age of 5.
And so if we can combine gun safety with sensible background checks and some other steps, we’re not going to eliminate gun violence, but we will lessen it. And if we take that number from 30,000 down to, let’s say, 28,000, that’s 2,000 families who don’t have to go through what the families at Newtown or San Bernardino or Charleston went through.
And so what we’ve proposed is that if you have a background check system that has a bunch of big loopholes, which is why a lot of criminals and people who shouldn’t have guns are able to get guns…
COOPER: But they’re not buying them at gun shows. Only 1 percent of criminals are buying them at gun shows.
OBAMA: Well, no, but this is what happens. Let’s go back to the city of Chicago that has strong gun control laws. And oftentimes, the NRA will point to that as an example and say, see, these things don’t work.
Well, the problem is, is that about 30 percent, 40 percent of those guns are coming from Indiana across the border, where there are much laxer laws, and so folks will go to a gun show and purchase a whole bunch of firearms, put them in a van, drive up into Mike Pfleger’s neighborhood on the South Side of Chicago where his parish is, open up the trunk, and those things are for sale.
Now, technically, you could say those folks bought them illegally, but it was facilitated by the fact that what used to be a small exception that said collectors and hobbyists don’t need to go through a background check has become this massive industry where people who are doing business are, in fact, saying that they’re not in the business of selling guns, but are.
And all we’re saying here is, is that we want to put everybody on notice that the definition of doing business, which means you have to register and it means you have to run a background check, is if you are making a profit and repeatedly selling guns, then you should have to follow the same rules as every other gun dealer. And what it means…
COOPER: But there’s a lot of people who believe that’s not specific enough. Because there’s a lot of, you know, fathers and sons who sell guns every now and then at gun shows. Are they going to have to now start doing background checks? Are they going to start to have to register?
OBAMA: Look, what the Justice Department has done is provided a whole range of very specific examples. And what we ultimately need, I believe, is for Congress to set up a system that is efficient, that doesn’t inconvenience the lawful gun seller, or purchaser, but, that makes sure that we’re doing the best background check possible. And, the fact, Anderson, the system may not catch every single person, or there may be a circumstance where somebody doesn’t think that they have to register, or do, and that may cause some red tape, and bureaucracy for them – which – or inconvenience, has to be weighed against the fact that we may be able to save a whole bunch of families from the grief that some of the people in this audience have had to go through.
And, keep in mind, for the gun owners who are in attendance here, my suspicion is that you all had to go through a background check. And it didn’t prevent you from getting a weapon. And, the notion that you should have to do that, but there are a whole bunch of folks who are less responsible than you who don’t have to do it doesn’t make much sense. So, why we should resist this – keep in mind that, historically, the NRA was in favor of background checks.
Historically, many in the Republican party were in favor of background checks. And, what’s changed is not that my proposals are particularly radical, what’s changed is that we’ve suddenly created an atmosphere where I put out a proposal like background checks, or after Sandy Hook, we’re calling on Congress along with people like Gabby Giffords who herself was a victim of gun violence, we put out a proposal that is commonsense, modest, does not claim to solve every problem, is respectful of the second amendment. And, the way it is described is that we’re trying to take away everybody’s guns.
And, part of the reason I welcomed this opportunity by CNN to have a good discussion debate about it is because our position is consistently mischaracterized. And, by the way, there’s a reason why the NRA is not here.
Their just down the street. And, since this is the main reason they exist, you’d think they’d be prepared to have a debate with…
COOPER: … would you be be willing to meet with them…
OBAMA: … a president…
COOPER: … they haven’t been to the White House for years (inaudible)…
OBAMA: … oh, no, no, we’ve invited them.
COOPER: So, right now, tonight, you’re saying you would be willing…
OBAMA: … we have invited them repeatedly, but if you listen to the rhetoric, it is so over the top, and so overheated, and most importantly, is not acknowledging the fact that there’s no other – consumer item that we purchase…
COOPER: … so is that an open invitation that you’ve…
OBAMA: … oh, hold on a second, let me finish this point, Cooper.
There’s nothing else in our lives that we purchase where we don’t try to make it a little safer if we can. Traffic fatalities have gone down drastically during my lifetime, and part of it is technology, and part of it is that the National Highway Safety Administration does research, and they figure out, you know what? Seat belts really work.
And, then we pass some laws to make sure seatbelts are fastened.
Air bags make a lot sense, let’s try those out. Toys, we say, you know what? We find out that kids are swallowing toys all the time, let’s make sure that the toys aren’t so small that they swallow them if they’re for toddlers, or infants. Medicine, kids can’t open Aspirin caps.
Now, the notion that we would not apply the same basic principles to gun ownership as we do to everything else that we own…
COOPER: … but you…
OBAMA: … just to try to make them safer, or the notion that anything we do to try to make them safer is somehow a plot to take away guns – that contradicts what we do to try to create a better life for Americans in every other area of our lives.
COOPER: Just so I’m clear, tonight you’re saying you would welcome to meet with the NRA?
OBAMA: Anderson, I’ve said this repeatedly, I’m happy to meet with them. I’m happy to talk to them, but, the conversation has to be based on facts and truth, and what we’re actually proposing, not some – you know, imaginary fiction in which Obama’s trying to take away your guns…
COOPER: … well, let’s talk about what you’re proposing…
OBAMA: … oh, and the reason, by the way, that gun sales spike not just before I propose something, every time there’s a mass shooting, gun sales spike.
And part of the reason is that the NRA has convinced many of its members that somebody’s going to come grab your guns, which is by the way, really profitable for the gun manufacturers. It’s a great advertising mechanism, but it’s not necessary. There is enough of a market out there for people who want protection, who are sportsmen, who want to go hunting with their kids and we can make it safer.
COOPER: I want to open this up to people in our audience.
OBAMA: Absolutely.
COOPER: A lot of people have traveled far. I want you to meet Taya Kyle. She’s the widow of Chris Kyle, former Navy SEAL, author of “American Sniper.” Taya wrote a book, “American Life: A Memoir of Love, War, Faith and Renewal.”
Taya, we’re happy you’re here. What do you want to ask the president?
QUESTION: I appreciate you taking the time to come here. And I think that your message of hope is something I agree with. And I think it’s great. And I think that by creating new laws, you do give people hope. The thing is that the laws that we create don’t stop these horrific things from happening, right? And that’s a very tough pill to swallow.
We want to think that we can make a law and people will follow it. By the very nature of their crime, they’re not following it. By the very nature of looking at the people who hurt our loved ones here, I don’t know that any of them would have been stopped by the background check. And yet, I crave that desire for hope, too.
And so I think part of it we have to recognize that we cannot outlaw murder because people who are murdering, right, are – they’re breaking the law, but they also don’t have a moral code that we have. And so they could do the same amount of damage with a pipe bomb. The problem is that they want to murder.
And I’m wondering why it wouldn’t be a better use of our time to give people hope in a different way, to say, “You know what? We” – well first of all, actually, let me back up to that. Because with the laws, I know that at least last I heard, the federal prosecution of gun crimes was like 40 percent. And what I mean by that is that there are people lying on these forms already and we’re not prosecuting them. So there’s an issue there, right?
But instead, if we can give people hope and say also during this time while you’ve been president, we are at the lowest murder rate in our country – all-time low murders. We’re at an all-time high of gun ownership, right?
I’m not necessarily saying the two are correlated, but what I’m saying is that we’re at an all-time low for murder rate. That’s a big deal. And yet I think most of us in this country feel like it could happen at any moment. It could happen to any of us at any time.
And I’m almost finished. Just when – when you talk about the NRA, and after a mass shooting that gun sales go up, I would argue that it’s not necessarily that I think somebody’s going to come take my gun from me, but I want the hope – and the hope that I have the right to protect myself; that I don’t end up to be one of these families; that I have the freedom to carry whatever weapon I feel I need, just like your wife said on that farm (ph). You know, I don’t – the sheriff’s aren’t going to get to my house either.
And I understand that background checks aren’t necessarily going to stop me from getting a gun, but I also know that they wouldn’t have stopped any of the people here in this room from killing. And so it seems like almost a false sense of hope.
So why not celebrate where we are? I guess that’s my real question is…
OBAMA: Well…
QUESTION: Celebrate that we’re good people, and 99.9 percent of us are never going to kill anyone.
OBAMA: Well, let me make a couple of points. First of all, thanks to your husband for his service and thank you for your service, because extraordinary heroism that he and your family have shown in protecting all of us. And I’m very grateful for that.
Number two, what you said about murder rates and violent crime generally is something that we don’t celebrate enough. The fact of the matter is that violent crime has been steadily declining across America for a pretty long time. And you wouldn’t always know it by watching television, but overall, most cities are much safer than they were 10 years ago or 20 years ago.
Now, I challenge the notion that the reason for that is because there’s more gun ownership, because if you look at where are the areas with the highest gun ownership, those are the places in some cases where the crime rate hasn’t dropped down that much. And the places where there’s pretty stiff restrictions on gun ownership, in some of those places, the crime has dropped really quickly. So I’m not sure that there’s a one-to-one correlation there.
But I think the most important point I want to make is that you will be able to purchase a firearm. Some criminals will get their hands on firearms even if there’s a background check. Somebody may lie on a form. Somebody will intend to commit a crime, but they don’t have a record that shows up on the background check system.
But, in the same way that we don’t eliminate all traffic accidents, but, over the course of 20 years, traffic accidents get lower – there’s still tragedies. There’s still drunk drivers. There’s still people who don’t wear their seat belts, but over time, that violence was reduced, and so families are spared.
That’s the same thing that we can do with gun ownership. There is a way for us to set up a system where you, a responsible gun owner who – I’m assuming, given your husband and your family, is a much better marksman than I am – can have a firearm to protect yourself, but where it is much harder for somebody to fill up a car with guns and sell them to 13-year-old kids on the streets.
And – and that is, I think, what we’re trying to do. What we’re also trying to do is make the database more effective, so that’s part of the proposal – which, by the way, will convenience you when you go to the store, because if we can set up a 24/7 background check system, then that means that it’s less likely that things slip through the cracks or it’s more difficult for you to – to get your background check completed.
And we’re also trying to close a loophole that has been developing over the last decade, where now, people are using cut-out trusts and shell corporations to purchase the most dangerous weapons – sawed-off shotguns, automatic weapons, silencers – and don’t have to go through background checks at all.
And we don’t know whether – are these sales going to, you know, drug traffickers? Are they – we don’t know who’s purchasing them right now. And so what we’re saying is, you know what? That is something that we got to do something about.
The same thing is true with Internet sales, where one study has shown that 1 out of 30 persons who are purchasing weapons over the Internet turn out to have a felony record, and that’s not something you want to see.
COOPER: I think one question a lot of people have about you is, do you believe the fundamental notion that a good guy with a gun, or a good woman with a gun is an important bulwark against a bad person with a gun?
And before you answer, I want you to meet Kimberly Corban. Kimberly was a college student in Colorado in 2006. Kimberly’s right over there. She was raped by a man who broke into her apartment.
She testified for three hours in the trial against him. Her attacker was sentenced to 24 years to life in prison, and I know that attack, Kimberly, changed your view of handguns. What’s your question for the president?
QUESTION: Absolutely.
As a survivor of rape, and now a mother to two small children – you know, it seems like being able to purchase a firearm of my choosing, and being able to carry that wherever my – me and my family are – it seems like my basic responsibility as a parent at this point.
I have been unspeakably victimized once already, and I refuse to let that happen again to myself or my kids. So why can’t your administration see that these restrictions that you’re putting to make it harder for me to own a gun, or harder for me to take that where I need to be is actually just making my kids and I less safe?
OBAMA: Well, Kimberly, first of all, obviously – you know, your story is horrific. The strength you’ve shown in telling your story and, you know, being here tonight is remarkable, and so – really proud of you for that.
I – I just want to repeat that there’s nothing that we’ve proposed that would make it harder for you to purchase a firearm. And – now, you may be referring to issues like concealed carry, but those tend to be state-by-state decisions, and we’re not making any proposals with respect to what states are doing. They can make their own decisions there.
So there really is no – nothing we’re proposing that prevents you or makes it harder for you to purchase a firearm if you need one. There are always questions as to whether or not having a firearm in the home protects you from that kind of violence, and I’m not sure we can resolve that. People argue it both sides.
What is true is, is that you have to be pretty well trained in order to fire a weapon against somebody who is assaulting you and catches you by surprise.
And what is also true is there’s always the possibility that that firearm in a home leads to a tragic accident. You know, we can debate that round or flat.
But for now, what I just want to focus on is that you certainly would like to make it a little harder for that assailant to have also had a gun. You certainly would want to make sure that if he gets released, that he now can’t do what he did to you to somebody else, and it’s going to be easier for us to prevent him from getting a gun if there’s a strong background system in place – background check system in place.
And so, you know, if you look at the statistics, there’s no doubt that there are times where somebody who has a weapon has been able to protect themselves and scare off an intruder or an assailant, but what is more often the case is that they may not have been able to protect themselves, but they end up being the victim of the weapon that they purchased themselves. And that is – that’s something that can be debated.
In the meantime, all I’m focused on is making sure that a terrible crime like yours that was committed is not made easier because somebody can go on the Internet and just buy whatever weapon they want without us finding out whether they’re a criminal or not.
COOPER: Kimberly, thank you for being here. I appreciate it.
You talked about Chicago, and there’s a lot of folks from Chicago here tonight. I want you to meet – or I want everybody to meet, because I know you’ve met her before, Cleo Pendleton. She’s sitting over there. And I should point out – I think I said it earlier – 55 shootings in Chicago in just the past seven days.
Cleo Pendleton, her daughter, Hadiya, performed at your second inauguration. She was shot to death a little more than a week later. She was 15 years old. She was an honor student, a majorette, and you being tonight honors her, so thank you very much for being here. What’s your question to the president?
QUESTION: Well, I want to say thank you, first of all, for making it more difficult for guns to get in the hands of those that shouldn’t have them. Thank you for the action you took on Tuesday.
But I want to ask a question. How can we stop the trafficking of guns from states with looser gun laws into states with tougher gun laws? Because I believe that’s the case, you know, often in Chicago, and possibly the source of the gun that shot and murdered my daughter.
OBAMA: Well, first of all, it’s great to see you again. And, you know, part of the reason that we do this is because when you meet parents of wonderful young people, and they tell their stories, at least for me, I think of Malia and I think of Sasha and I think of my nieces and I think of my nephews. And, you know, the pain that any of us go through with a loss like that is extraordinary. And I couldn’t be prouder of the families who are here representing both sides, but who’ve been affected in those ways.
If we are able to set up a strong background check system – and my proposal, by the way, includes hiring – having the FBI hire a couple hundred more people to help process background checks, because the big numbers you’re talking about, 20 million checks that are getting done every year, hiring 200,000 – or 200 more ATF agents to be able to go after unscrupulous gun dealers, then that will apply across the country.
And so – you know, some states may have laws that allow for conceal and carry. Some states may not. There are still going to be differences. But what will at least be consistent across the country is that it’s a little bit harder to get a gun.
Now, we can’t guarantee that criminals are not going to have ways of getting guns. But, for example, it may be a little more difficult and a little more expensive. And, you know, the laws of supply and demand mean that if something’s harder to get and it’s a little more expensive to get, then fewer people get them. And that in and of itself could make a difference.
So if somebody is a straw purchaser – and what that means is they don’t intend the guns for themselves, they intend to resell them to somebody else – they go to a gun show in Indiana, where right now they don’t have to do a background check, load them – load up a van, and open up that van and sell them to kids and gangs in Chicago, if now that person has to go through a background check and register, ATF now has the capacity to find out if, and when a gun is used in a crime in Chicago where that gun comes from.
And, now you know, here’s somebody who seems to be willing to sell a gun to a 15 year old who had a known record.
COOPER: But you’re only going to be asking people to get a license, and do background checks if they give out business cards, if they’re selling weapons in the original packaging. Somebody just walking around a gun show selling a weapon, not necessarily going to have to register.
OBAMA: No – look, there’s going to be a case by case evaluation. Are they on an ongoing basis making a profit, and are they repeatedly selling firearms.
COOPER: OK, I want you to meet Sheriff Paul Babeu, of Pinal County, Arizona. He’s a Republican running for Congress after the recent terror attacks. Sherif, I know you’ve been telling citizens to arm themselves to protect their families…
QUESTION: … yes…
COOPER: … sheriff, what’s your question to the President?
QUESTION: Well, first, deputies and a slow response time has been mentioned a couple of times, and I want to be clear about – my deputies have a very fast emergency response time…
(LAUGHING)
OBAMA: I’m sure that’s true.
QUESTION: Mr. President, you’ve said you’ve be thwarted by – frustrated by Congress. As a Sheriff, I often times get frustrated, but I don’t make the laws, and I’ve sworn an oath to enforce the law, to uphold the Constitution, same oath you’ve taken. And, the talk, you know, why we’re here, is all these mass shootings, and, yet you’ve said in your executive action it wouldn’t have solved even one of these, or…
OBAMA: … oh, I didn’t say that…
QUESTION: … well…
OBAMA: … I didn’t say that it wouldn’t solve one…
QUESTION: … Wwll – we’ve) got the information, what would it have solved…
COOPER: None of the recent mass shootings, I should point out, none of the guns were purchased from an unlicensed dealer.
QUESTION: Correct. And, that’s what I’m speaking to – the executive action that you mentioned. Earlier, you mentioned Aspirin, toys, or cars – they’re not written about in the Constitution. I want to know, and I think all of us really want to get to the solution – and you said don’t talk past each other – what would you have done to prevent these mass shootings and the terrorist attack.
And, how do we get those with mental illness, and criminals, that’s the real problem here, how are we going to get them to follow the laws?
OBAMA: Well, first of all, I appreciate your service, good luck on your race. You sure you want to Congress?
(LAUGHING)
QUESTION: I don’t want to (inaudible)…
OBAMA: I’m sure that’s true!
(LAUGHING)
OBAMA: That’ll hurt you, and I’m sure it’s a Republican district.
Look, crime is always going to be with us. So, I think it’s really important for us not to suggest that if we can’t solve every crime, we shouldn’t try to solve any crimes.
(APPLAUSE)
And – the problem, when we talk about that guns don’t kill people, people kill people, it’s primarily a mental health problem, or it’s a criminal and evil problem, and that’s what we have to get at. All of us are interested in fighting crime, I’m very proud of the fact that violent crime rates have continued to go down during the course of my presidency.
I’ve got an attorney general, an FBI that works very closely with local law enforcement in busting up crime rings all the time, that’s a huge priority to us. And, we’re probably providing grants to your department to help go after criminals. The challenge we have is that in many instances you don’t know ahead of time who’s going to be the criminal. It’s not – it’s not as if criminals walk around with a label saying, “I’m a criminal.”
And, by the way, the young man who killed those kids in New Town, he didn’t have a criminal record, and so, we didn’t know ahead of time, necessarily, that he was going to do something like that.
But, he was able to have access to an arsenal that allowed him in very short order to kill an entire classroom of small children. And, so, the question then becomes, are there ways for us, since we can’t identify that person all the time, are there ways for us to make it less lethal when something like that happens.
And, I mentioned this during my speech at the White House a couple of days ago. Right around the time of New Town, in China, a guy was obviously similarly deranged, had a knife and started attacking a bunch of school children. About the same number were cut or stabbed by this guy, but most of them survived. And the reason was because he wasn’t yielding (sic) a semiautomatic.
So – so the – the main point, I think, that I want to make here is that everybody here is in favor of going after criminals, locking them up, making sure that we’re creating an environment where kids don’t turn into criminals and providing the – the support that they need.
Those are all important things. Nobody’s – nobody’s saying we need to be going soft on criminals. What we do have to make sure of is that we don’t make it so easy for them to have access to deadly weapons.
In neighborhoods like Chicago – but I’m – I keep on using Chicago. This is all across the country. You go into any neighborhood. It used to be that parents would see some kids messing around on the corner, and they’d say, “yo,” even if they weren’t the parent of those children, “go back inside. Stop doing that.”
And over time, it was a lot harder to discipline somebody else’s kid and have the community maintain order, or talk to police officers if somebody’s doing something wrong, because now somebody is worried about getting shot.
And if we can create an environment that’s just a little bit safer for – in those communities, that will help. And if it doesn’t infringe on your Second Amendment rights, and it doesn’t infringe on your Second Amendment rights, and you’re still able to get a firearm for your protection, why wouldn’t we want to do that?
COOPER: We’ve got to take a break.
(APPLAUSE)
We’re going to take a quick break. Our live town hall conversation, Guns in America, with President Barack Obama, continues right after this.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
COOPER: And welcome back. We’re live at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia, continuing our 360 town hall conversation with President Barack Obama, Guns in America. Talking to voices from all sides of the issue, including the president.
You made your announcement just the other day in a very obviously emotional ceremony at the White House. I want to play just a moment from it for those who haven’t seen it.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
OBAMA: And from first graders in Newtown – first graders, and from every family who never imagined that their loved one would be taken from our lives by a bullet from a gun.
Every time I think about those kids, it gets me mad.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
COOPER: I think a lot of people were surprised by that moment.
OBAMA: I was, too, actually. You know, I visited Newtown two days after what happened, so it was still very raw. It’s the only time I’ve ever seen Secret Service cry on duty. And it wasn’t just the parents. You had siblings, you know – 10-year-olds, eight-year-olds, three-year-olds who in some cases didn’t even understand that their brother or sister weren’t going to be coming home.
And I’ve said this before. It – it continues to haunt me. It was one of the worst days of my presidency. But – but look, I want to emphasize that there are a lot of tragedies that happen out there as a consequence of the victims of crime. There are police officers who are out there laying down their lives to protect us every single day.
You know, and – and tears are appropriate for them as well, and I visit with those families as well – victims of terrorism, soldiers coming home. You know, there’s a lot of heartache out there. And I don’t suggest that this is the only kind of heartache we should be working on. You know, I spend a lot of time and a lot of hours, in fact a lot more hours than I spend on this, trying to prevent terrorist attacks.
I spend a lot of time and a lot of hours trying to make sure that we’re continuing to reduce our crime rate. There are a whole bunch of other answers that are just as important when it comes to making sure that the streets of places like Chicago and Baltimore are safer; making sure kids get a good early childhood education; making sure that we’re teaching conflict resolution that doesn’t involve violence; making sure that, you know, faith communities are able to reach out to young people and intervene in timely ways.
So, this is not a recipe for solving every problem. Again, I just want to emphasize that the goal here is just to make progress. And I – it’s interesting. As I – as I enter into my last year as – as president, I could not be prouder of the work that we’ve done, but it also makes you really humble because you realize that change takes a long time, and a lot of the work you do is just to incrementally make things better so that 10 years from now, 20 years from now, the crime rate has gone down.
That’s not just because of my administration. That’s – the groundwork was laid by a bunch of good work by law enforcement and others for years, across administrations on a bipartisan basis. The same is true with traffic safety. The same is true with advances in medicine. The same can be true with this if we stop exaggerating or mischaracterizing the positions of either side, and we just come up with some sensible areas that people agree with.
Background checks are an example. The majority of gun owners agree with this.
COOPER: You talked about faith communities. Father Michael Pfleger is here. I know you know him well. He’s a Roman Catholic priest in Chicago. For those who don’t know, his Church of St. Sabina on the south side of Chicago. I was there about a month ago. It was a great honor to be there.
Father, you’ve given a lot of eulogies for a lot of kids in your community; far too many over the 40 years that you have been there. What’s your question for the president?
QUESTION: Mr. President, first of all, thank you for your courage and your passion, and keep pushing. I happen to be from one of those cities where violence is not going down. Not only did Anderson mention the 55 shot, there’s been 11 killed in seven days in Chicago.
And one of the main reasons for that is the easy access to guns. It’s easier to get a gun in my neighborhood than it is a computer. And the reality is, is because many of those guns have been bought legally.
And I understand why people are pushing against you, because I understand it’s a business and it’s about a business. And so if we cut back the easy access to guns, less money for the gun manufacturers, less money for the gun lobby, I understand the business of it. But that business is causing blood and the kids that are dying in Chicago. And for many years, nobody even cared about Chicago because the violence is primarily black and brown.
The reality is that I don’t understand why we can’t title guns just like cars. If I have a car and I give it to you, Mr. President, and I don’t transfer a title, and you’re in an accident, it’s on me. We don’t take cars away by putting titles on them. Why can’t we do that with guns? And every gun in America – so if somebody who’s buying 200 guns, selling them on the streets, if they can’t transfer those titles, then they’re going to be held responsible for the guns that they sell.
OBAMA: Well, Father Mike, first of all, for those of you who don’t know him, has been working since I – since before I had moved to Chicago and I was a 23-year-old when I first met him. And somehow I aged, and he didn’t.
(LAUGHTER)
COOPER: Your gray hair is not going back, I can tell you from experience.
OBAMA: He was always the best-looking priest in Chicago, so – but Father Pfleger has done heroic work at St. Sabina Parish. Issues like licensing, registration, that’s an area where there’s just not enough national consensus at this stage to even consider it. And part of it is, is people’s concern that that becomes a prelude to taking people’s guns away.
I mean, part of the challenge in this is that the gun debate gets wrapped up in broader debates about whether the federal government is oppressive and, you know, there are conspiracy theories floating around the Internet these days all the time. We did a military exercise in Texas, and a whole bunch of folks were sure that this was the start of martial law and were suggesting maybe don’t cooperate with the United States Army in an effort to prepare so that if they get deployed overseas, they can handle it. But that’s how difficult sometimes these debates are.
But there are – but I want to pick up on some things where I think there should be consensus. One of those areas that I talked about at the speech, part of the proposal is developing smart gun technology.
Now, this is an interesting example. I don’t exactly understand this, and maybe there will be somebody in the audience who explains it to me. Back in 1997, the CEO of Colt said, you know, we can design or are starting to develop guns where you can only use it if you’ve got a chip. You know, you wear a band or a bracelet, and that then protects your 2-year-old or 3-year-old from picking up the gun and using it. And a boycott was called against them, and – and they had to back off of developing that technology.
The same with Smith and Wessen. They were in the process of developing similar technology, and they were attacked by the NRA as surrendering.
Now, to me, this does not make sense. If you are a gun-owner, I would think that you would at least want a choice so that if you wanted to purchase a firearm that could only be used by you, in part to avoid accidents in your home, in part to make sure that if it’s stolen, it’s not used by a criminal, in part if there’s an intruder, you pull the gun, but you – somehow it gets wrested away from you, that gun can’t be turned on you and used on you, I would think there might be a market for that. You could sell that gun.
Now, I’m not saying that necessarily would be the only gun that’s available, but it seems to me that that would be something that, in any other area, in any other product, any other commercial venture, there’d be some research and development on that, because that’s a promising technology.
COOPER: Can I – I want to…
OBAMA: It – it hasn’t – it has not been developed, primarily because it’s been blocked by either the NRA, which is – are funded by gun manufacturers, or other reasons.
In part, what we proposed was, you know what? We’re gonna do some of the research. We’ll work with the private sector. We’ll figure out whether or not this technology can be developed…
(APPLAUSE)
… and then give everybody a choice in terms of the kind of firearm that they want to purchase, because I think that there will in fact be a market for that. And over time, that’s an example of how we could reduce some of the preventable gun deaths out there.
COOPER: I want to bring somebody who actually knows a lot about selling guns. Why don’t you meet Kris Jacob, he’s vice president of the American Firearms Retailers Association, he’s the owner of the Bullseye indoor shooting range and gun store in San Rafael, California.
Kris, it’s great to have you here. First of all, how is business under President Obama? Because everything I read says…
QUESTION: Great.
COOPER: … gun sales have been going up. Every time he talks about guns, gun sales go up.
QUESTION: It’s been busy, and – and certainly, I think that shows, as Taya (ph) said earlier, that there’s a very serious concern in this country about personal security. And the sheriff is right – they do everything they possibly can to make sure they get there as quickly as they possibly can.
And – and my question is actually focused around law enforcement, as well. There are 53,000 licensed gun dealers in the United States who stand behind the counter and say “no” to people all day.
OBAMA: Yep.
JACOB: We feel it’s our responsibility to make sure that people who have a criminal past, people who are mentally ill or are having a bad day don’t get possession of firearms. So we assist law enforcement all the time in the process of making sure that those things don’t change hands inside our commercial market…
OBAMA: Right.
JACOB: … if they shouldn’t. It’s a very serious responsibility for us, and as a group, we take it very seriously.
My question is around the executive order related to the investigators, the inspectors. The adding of 200 inspectors, who are more on the auditing and record-keeping side.
Why not add 200 ATF agents on the law enforcement side, to keep the criminals and the bad guys out of the stores in the first place? I mean, the problem seems to me – to be – you mentioned dealers who are less responsible than others, and certainly, it’s possible that those folks are out there.
But if we can enforce the laws that already exist, the tens of thousands of gun laws that are on the books right now, it might create a very significant deterrent…
(CROSSTALK)
QUESTION: … getting those people in the stores (ph).
COOPER: Let me also point out – the number of ATF agents, during your administration, has actually declined. So even if you hired…
OBAMA: Yes. Not – not – not because of my budget.
COOPER: … 200 more – but even if you hired 200 more, you’ll get it to what it was right before you took office.
OBAMA: Absolutely. Well, look. First of all, there are a whole bunch of responsible gun dealers out there, and my hope would be that those gun dealers would support making sure that everybody is following the same rules that they are. That’s number one.
Number two is we’re not writing a new law. Only Congress can do that. This is about enforcing existing laws, and closing what has grown into a massive loophole where a huge percentage of – of guns, many of whom end up being traced to crime, are not going through the responsible gun dealers, but are going through irresponsible folks, who are not registered as doing business.
And the whole goal here is to clarify, and to put on notice that, if you’re a business, even if you don’t have bricks and mortar, then you’re supposed to register and you’re supposed to conduct background checks.
So the – the issue is not where you do it, it’s what you’re doing, and that should not be something that threatens responsible gun dealers across the country.
In terms of the ATF, it is absolutely true that the ATF budget has been shrank, because – has be – been shrunk. That’s a little late, but, you know, you knew what I meant.
(LAUGHTER)
And – and part of it is because the – the politicizing of this issue. So, many in the Republican Congress feel as if the ATF is not their friend, but their enemy. Part of – part of the – the story I was telling…
COOPER: You said this issue should be politicized, though.
OBAMA: Well, but what I mean by that, Anderson, is, is that they have been portrayed as trying to take people’s guns away, as opposed to
OBAMA: … part of this story….
COOPER: … the sentence (ph) shouldn’t be politicized though.
OBAMA: Well, what I mean by that, Anderson, is that they have been portrayed as trying to take people’s guns away, as opposed to trying to make sure that the laws are enforced. And, one of the most frustrating things that I hear is when people say – who are opposed to any further laws, why don’t you just enforce the laws that are on the books, and those very same members of Congress then cut a ATF budgets to make it impossible to enforce the law.
(APPLAUSE)
… and, so, it is – and, by the way, the ATF a law enforcement agency working under the FBI that is doing enormous work in going after criminals, and drug cartels, and have a pretty dangerous job, so, it’s not as if doing background checks, or auditing gun sales is all that they’re doing. Part of my proposal is also developing better technologies so that we can do tracing of shells when a crime is committed in order to figure out who exactly are the perpetrators of the crime, and where exactly they obtained the weapon.
So, there’s a whole bunch of other elements to this that are going to be important.
But, my hope is that responsible gun dealers like yourself, and your organization are going to be supportive of this proposal because it should actually help push away unscrupulous dealers. That means more customers for you guys.
COOPER: I want to bring in Mark Kelly, as you know, former astronaut, husband of former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, who we’re proud to say is here tonight. Five years ago this week, in Tucson, Arizona, Congresswoman Giffords was shot, six others were killed. Captain, your question?
QUESTION: Thank you for being here, Mr. President. As you know, Gabby and I are both gun owners, we take gun ownership very seriously. And, you know, really think about the voices of responsible gun owners in this debate.
But, I want to follow up to something Father Pfleger said, and you answer to his question. And, it’s about expanded background checks. Often what you hear in the debate of expanding background checks to more gun sales, and, as you know, Gabby and I are 100% behind the concept of somebody getting a background check before buying a gun.
But, when we testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee, we heard not only from the gun lobby, but from United States Senators that expanding background checks will, not may, will lead to a registry, which will lead to confiscation, which will lead to a tyrannical government.
So, I would like you to explain with 350 million guns in 65 million places, households, from Key West, to Alaska, 350 million objects in 65 million places, if the Federal government wanted to confiscate those objects, how would they do that?
(APPLAUSE)
OBAMA: Well, look, first of all, everytime I see Gabby I’m just so thrilled because I visited her in the hospital, and, as I mentioned, I think, in the speech in the White House, as we left the hospital then to go to a memorial service, we got word that Gabby had opened her eyes for the first time.
And, we did not think she was going to be here, and she is, and Mark’s just been extraordinary.
And, by the way, Mark’s twin brothers up in space right now, and is breaking the record for the longest continuous orbiting of the planet, which is pretty impressive stuff.
What I think Mark is alluding to is what I said earlier, this notion of a conspiracy out there, and it gets wrapped up in concerns about the Federal government.
Now, there’s a long history of that, that’s in our DNA, you know? The United States was born suspicious of some distant authority…
COOPER: … now, let me just jump in here, is it fair to call it a conspiracy…
OBAMA: … well, yeah…
COOPER: … because a lot of people really believe this deeply, that they just don’t…
OBAMA: … no…
COOPER: … they just don’t trust you.
OBAMA: I’m sorry, Cooper, yes. It is fair to call the conspiracy, what are you saying? Are you suggesting that the notion that we are creating a plot to take everybody’s guns away so that we can impose martial law…
COOPER: … not everybody, but there’s certainly a lot of…
OBAMA: … but a conspiracy? Yes, that is a conspiracy! I would hope that would agree with that.
(APPLAUSE)
OBAMA: Is that controversial? Except on some website…
COOPER: There are – there are certainly a lot of people who just have a fundamental distrust that you do not want to get – go further and further and further down this road.
OBAMA: Well, look, I mean, I’m only going to be here for another year. I don’t know – when – when would I have started on this enterprise, right?
I come from the state of Illinois, which we’ve been talking about Chicago, but downstate Illinois is closer to Kentucky than it is to Chicago. And everybody hunts down there. And a lot of folks own guns. And so this is not, like, alien territory to me. I’ve got a lot of friends, like Mark, who are hunters. I just came back from Alaska where I ate a moose that had just been shot, and it was pretty good.
So, yes, it is – it is a false notion that I believe is circulated for either political reasons or commercial reasons in order to prevent a coming-together among people of goodwill to develop commonsense rules that will make us safer while preserving the Second Amendment.
And the notion