The measure, which passed with more than 51% backing in November, would have created an independent ethics commission, limited lobbyist gifts to lawmakers, banned officials from joining lobbying firms for two years after leaving office and created so-called "Democracy vouchers" for registered voters to steer toward their preferred candidates.
But state GOP lawmakers said they didn't think voters knew what they were doing.
Gov. Dennis Daugaard, a Republican, signed the repeal bill on Thursday night. In a budget address
delivered after the November referendum, he claimed the public had been "hoodwinked by scam artists who grossly misrepresented these proposed measures."
Republican legislators pushed the bill using an "emergency" clause that allows for the reversal to take effect immediately and now prevents voters from initiating a new referendum campaign in response.
"The public will remember this vote (by state legislators) as the catalyst that launched the American anti-corruption movement," Represent.Us director Josh Silver, whose organization supported and spent money to back the initiative, said in a statement after the repeal bill passed the state senate. "The state motto in South Dakota is 'Under God, The People Rule.' The fight against corruption will not end until elected leaders abide by that principle."
State Republicans' decision to effectively overturn the referendum results also comes on the heels of a controversial attempt by House Republicans in Washington to gut an independent ethics watchdog. That move was squashed on January 3
, when GOP leaders and, eventually, then-President-elect Donald Trump asked them to stand down.
In 2015, the ethics watchdogs at the Center for Public Integrity gave South Dakota an "F" grade
in its "state integrity investigation." It ranked 47th overall and 49th in transparency of "lobbying disclosure."
Meanwhile, the state has become a battleground in the proxy fight over the influence of money in politics. Represent.Us and and the Koch Brothers-backed American for Prosperity, which opposed the measure
, both spent more than half a million dollars making their case to voters ahead of the 2016 vote.
State Senate Majority Leader Blake Curd, a Republican, has been a vocal critic of the new restrictions, claiming they are in violation of South Dakota and US constitutional law. Curd, his colleagues and a lobbying group filed suit against the law last year in a South Dakota circuit court. The judge issued a temporary injunction, effectively putting its implementation on hold pending further review.