Mick Mulvaney delivers the chilling truth

Mulvaney's take on lobbyist and money causes stir
Mulvaney's take on lobbyist and money causes stir

    JUST WATCHED

    Mulvaney's take on lobbyist and money causes stir

MUST WATCH

Mulvaney's take on lobbyist and money causes stir 01:36

Jeffrey Sachs is a professor and director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University. The opinions expressed in this commentary are his.

(CNN)Bless your soul, Mick Mulvaney, for spelling out so clearly and succinctly the evil that drives Washington. As the former congressman and now interim director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau explained to bankers on Tuesday, "We had a hierarchy in my office in Congress. If you're a lobbyist who never gave us money, I didn't talk to you. If you're a lobbyist who gave us money, I might talk to you." Yes, Mulvaney would also meet his constituents from back home, whom he insists were at the top of the hierarchy.

Jeffrey Sachs
America is a pay-to-play political system. When the lobbyists pay up, they're at the table. And to be sure, the big boys now run the show. The result is a political system among the most corrupt in the world, but with a twist of genius: the US Supreme Court has for all intents and purposes legalized the corruption and thereby put American democracy on a downward death spiral. The system works like this.
    America's business interests, upper classes and white population have long made it hard for the poor and working class to register to vote. In most other democracies, voter registration is not the responsibility of individual voters, but is more or less automatic. Unlike these other democracies, US elections are a game of voter turnout, not of substance.
    And voter turnout efforts are based heavily on money -- big money -- to run ads on TV and other media, buy voter data, manage expensive targeting of households, and other big-ticket strategies. The 2016 federal election cycle saw at least $6.4 billion spent on federal campaigns, and that's not counting the anonymous corporate sums that are not reported.
    Congressmen live and breathe for campaign funds, and also to avoid crossing the interests of powerful corporate lobbies that might fund a primary challenger. The result is that billionaires and powerful companies own and operate the US political system. The vulgarity of the US situation would shock Karl Marx, who famously described 19th century democracy as a system in which "the oppressed are allowed every few years to decide which particular representatives of the oppressing class are to represent and repress them."
    Warren to Mulvaney: You're hurting real people
    Warren to Mulvaney: You're hurting real people

      JUST WATCHED

      Warren to Mulvaney: You're hurting real people

    MUST WATCH

    Warren to Mulvaney: You're hurting real people 02:24
    The results are astounding. Public policy in America has almost nothing to do with broad public opinion, a point that America's leading political scientists such as Benjamin Page and Martin Gilens have been making for years in sophisticated research in top, peer-reviewed journals and in their recent book "Democracy in America? What Has Gone Wrong and What Can We Do About It."
    Jane Mayer brought this home with flair in her account in "Dark Money," focusing especially on mega-billionaires David and Charles Koch, as well as the detailed account of hedge-fund billionaire Robert Mercer of Cambridge Analytica notoriety.
    So, the public wants gun control, but Washington delivers guns and mass shooting instead. The public wants renewable energy, but Washington delivers EPA Chief Scott Pruitt and fossil fuels instead. The public wants taxes on the rich, but Washington delivers massive tax cuts for the rich instead. The public wants peace, but Washington and the military-industrial lobby deliver perpetual war instead. The American people are not the problem; the billionaires and their greedy agenda are at the heart of the crisis.
    During the Obamacare debates a few years ago, when I asked a congresswoman why there was so little attempt by Congress to control soaring medical care prices, she buried her head in her hands and murmured "the lobbies! the lobbies!" It was like Kurtz in "The Heart of Darkness" murmuring "The horror! the horror!"
    Jon Stewart slams 9/11 health program proposal
    jon stewart asks mulvaney leave world trade center health program alone sot_00003210

      JUST WATCHED

      Jon Stewart slams 9/11 health program proposal

    MUST WATCH

    Jon Stewart slams 9/11 health program proposal 02:19
    The Supreme Court's infamous decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission will go down in US history alongside Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) and Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) as among the worst moments in US jurisprudence. In Citizens United, the Supreme Court basically gutted any control over corruption by eliminating nearly all restrictions on independent campaign spending by corporations, on the grounds that such restrictions violate the "free speech" guarantee of the First Amendment.
    A system that was already corrupt up to the gills suddenly was essentially told, officially and at the highest level, that American democracy was hereafter being turned over to the highest bidder. Evidently, Mulvaney knew well how to play the game, as he was showered with largesse from the financial industry.
    The Roberts Court is certainly one of the shoddiest in American history. It followed up the Citizens United decision with McDonnell v. United States, declaring, in effect, that the blatant corruption of former Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell and his wife could be seen merely as a politician interacting normally with his constituents. McDonnell, duly convicted of bribery earlier by a jury of his peers, walked free after the Supreme Court ruling.
    In Citizens United, the court offered the following stunning claims: "We now conclude that independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption. ... The appearance of influence or access, furthermore, will not cause the electorate to lose faith in our democracy."
    Showdown of dueling bosses at watchdog agency
    Lead Jarrett Cfpb mulvaney trump live_00000000

      JUST WATCHED

      Showdown of dueling bosses at watchdog agency

    MUST WATCH

    Showdown of dueling bosses at watchdog agency 01:30
    It would be hard to find a more inaccurate statement. The public's confidence in American democracy has plummeted. In a January 2018 survey, just 8% of Americans expressed "a great deal of confidence" in the Congress. According to Gallup, the proportion of Americans expressing "a great deal" or "quite a lot" of confidence in Congress has declined from 30% in 2004 to just 12% in 2017.
    You have done your duty, Mulvaney, and now you and your ilk should resign in peace. It is also urgent to challenge again in the courts the absurd claims of Citizens United before the confidence in our political institutions falls to zero.