New York (CNN)By the end of the weekend, Los Angeles Rams owner Stan Kroenke could be a Super Bowl champion. But seven hours before kickoff against the New England Patriots, and an ocean away from the big game in Atlanta, another Kroenke-owned sports team might find itself in far less celebratory circumstances.
Rams owner, on brink of Super Bowl triumph, faces rebellion from English soccer fans
Arsenal, the English Premier League club that billionaire businessman Kroenke has owned since 2011, will travel to play Manchester City on Sunday in a showdown between two soccer teams at very different junctures in their respective histories.
City is the Premier League's defending champion and, though it hasn't matched its record-breaking form of last season, remains in contention to retain its crown and is also a serious contender to secure a first Champions League title, European club football's top cup competition.
Arsenal, meanwhile, is in the midst of another season where it is battling for a top-four finish rather than the title, and is once again struggling to keep pace, both on and off the pitch, with big-spending rivals.
The Londoners' notoriously leaky defense could be humbled at the Etihad on Sunday -- the Gunners lost 5-1 in December to league leaders Liverpool -- making Sunday a two-fold referendum of sorts on Kroenke the sports owner.
With the Rams, Kroenke finds himself on the brink of the American sporting summit, a win away from a championship three years after he helped engineer the team's move from St. Louis to southern California; at Arsenal, the American is viewed increasingly as the man who has overseen the club's wayward drift.
Kroenke has become so unpopular among Arsenal supporters that even those who might otherwise be indifferent to American football suddenly have a rooting interest in Super Bowl LIII.
"A lot of fans over here are backing the Patriots," said Robbie Lyle, the host and proprietor of the YouTube channel AFTV, which bills itself as the "unofficial voice of Arsenal fans around the world."
AFTV has built an enormous following since it launched in 2012, boasting more than 900,000 subscribers who tune in following the team's matches to watch Lyle interview fans, many of whom use the opportunity to rant and rave about the club's shortcomings.
Lately, most of the ire on the channel has been directed at Kroenke. In a video this week following an underwhelming Arsenal victory over lowly Cardiff City, an AFTV regular known as Troopz expressed his annoyance with Kroenke.
"He don't care, bro," Troopz said of the owner. "Until he goes, it's going to be the same sh*t."
In the passionate world of English soccer, a careless owner is public enemy No. 1.
Supporters of Newcastle United, a team that regularly fills its 52,000-seater stadium but only this week broke its transfer record that had stood for 14 years, have staged protests against owner Mike Ashley for years over a lack of proper investment.
At Blackpool F.C., a club in England's third division, fans have boycotted matches over displeasure with the club's owners. Some fans of Manchester United were once so infuriated by ownership that they formed their own club in 2005; F.C. United of Manchester are currently competing in the sixth tier of English football.
"The biggest problem for an owner of a club," Lyle told CNN in a phone interview this week, "is when fans here in the U.K. think you don't care."
While owning a team may represent a savvy investment for a billionaire like Kroenke, it's considered more than mere business in Europe, where many soccer clubs have been around for more than a century.
Owners of Italian soccer clubs still regularly offer comments after their team's matches, and Arsenal (founded in 1886) was traditionally owned by locals who grew up supporting the team.
"The idea of what ownership represents in an old fashioned English football club is maybe a little different than what an owner represents in American sports," said Amy Lawrence, a soccer writer for The Guardian who specializes in coverage of Arsenal.
Kroenke, 71, has a portfolio of sports teams to his name. Along with Arsenal and the Rams, his holding company, Kroenke Sports & Entertainment, also oversees the NBA's Denver Nuggets, the Colorado Rapids of MLS and the Colorado Avalanche of the NHL.
The Rams are, it would seem, Kroenke's crown jewel. In 2016, he uprooted the franchise from his native Missouri to bring the Rams back to their original home in Los Angeles. The move left fans in St. Louis bitter, but the NFL's power brokers celebrated the league's return to the country's second biggest market.
Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones lauded Kroenke for having the "the vision, resources, inspiration and creativity to create the right setting for the NFL in Los Angeles." Bill Plaschke, a sports columnist for the Los Angeles Times, gushed in August that Kroenke was the Rams' MVP. "He gets Los Angeles. He understands its fans. He knows what works, and, man, he's been working it," Plaschke wrote.
Fans in England still aren't convinced that Kroenke gets Arsenal, and his perceived indifference toward the club can be chalked up to a number of separate but related factors.
There is his reticence, a quality that has earned him the nickname "Silent Stan" and has left Arsenal supporters mystified over his plans for the club. He has professed a commitment to winning titles with the club, but such rhetoric is seen by many as perfunctory lip-service. Kroenke's absenteeism has also rankled fans. Lyle lamented that Kroenke failed to attend Arsenal's FA Cup tie with Manchester United last Friday.
"That was the biggest match in Europe [last weekend], and he's not there," Lyle said. "He's never there."
Kroenke's silence and poor attendance record have helped shape the unfavorable perception of him, but it's the club's stinginess that has cemented the fans' belief that the owner lacks competitive ambition.
That point was driven home last month, as Arsenal waded into the January transfer window -- the period of the season when European soccer clubs are able to sign new players -- operating yet again on a relatively shoestring budget.
The club brought in midfielder Denis Suarez on loan from Barcelona, with an option to make the deal permanent in the summer, but its ability to sign new players has been dwarfed in recent years by other big English clubs like City, Chelsea, Manchester United and Liverpool.
Under the ownership of Sheikh Mansour of the Abu Dhabi royal family, City have transformed from a relative afterthought to one of the best teams in Europe with more than a billion pounds spent on players over the last decade.
Arsenal, on the other hand, have continued to follow a "self-sustaining model," under which the club doesn't spend more than it brings in.
The approach is admirable to some fans who scoff at the idea of a club "buying a title." But with players commanding higher transfer fees and salaries, that parsimonious strategy hasn't yielded much silverware for Arsenal in recent years -- other than the FA Cup in 2014, 2015 and 2017.
Lawrence said that "the whole idea of being self-sustaining faced a massive challenge when the Sheikhs took over at Manchester City."