Thai election 'not free and fair' says monitor group

Newspapers at a shop in Bangkok trumpet coverage of the general election.

Bangkok, Thailand (CNN)Thailand's first general election since the army took over in a coup five years ago was not free and fair, according to an election watchdog, amid concerns over alleged voting irregularities.

The outcome of Sunday's elections is still unclear, with no party taking a decisive lead but both leading parties claiming the right to form a coalition. Persistent delays in the release of the final results has added to the confusion surrounding the electoral process.
On Monday evening, the fugitive former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra added his voice to the growing chorus of criticism, saying that Thailand's military government "manipulated" polling to ensure its grip on power.
Writing in an opinion piece in The New York Times, Thaksin pointed to myriad voting irregularities and accused the country's Election Commission of "interfering" with "the work of what are supposed to be independent agencies and institutions."
The billionaire telecoms mogul was ousted in a 2006 military coup and lives in self-imposed exile. But he remains extremely influential and leaders loyal to him have continued to dominate Thailand's turbulent political landscape.
"If neither the rules of the game nor the referees are fair, the outcome will not be respected by Thai people or internationally," Thaksin wrote.
His words come as two Asian election monitors released their reports into the integrity of Sunday's poll.

Inept Election Commission

The nongovernmental election watchdog Open Forum for Democracy Foundation (P-Net) determined that the election was "not free and fair."
Thai-based P-Net cited a litany of failures allegedly committed by the Thai Election Commission, including that it was unprepared for overseas advance voting; commission members were inexperienced, having being appointed just six to seven months before the election; and there were no voluntary observers at polling stations to detect potential fraud.
Polling station staff were poorly trained and did not follow regulations strictly and there was a lack of coordination to investigate claims of vote buying, according to P-Net.
Some candidates relied on vote buying and influence of local officials to secure wins, the watchdog added.
The commission was "incompetent to hold the elections efficiently," P-Net concluded.
A separate report from the The Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) International Election Observation Mission, also released on Tuesday, said the election process "displays fundamental democratic shortcomings."
While it said the voting process ran smoothly, issues such as "overly restrictive regulations" on the validity of ballot marks "contributed to the 2.8 million invalid ballots." And the organization and tally of ballots was "deeply flawed," leading to "an announcement of some preliminary results that were wildly inaccurate on election night."