(COMBO) This combination of file pictures created on September 14, 2016 shows the logo of German pharmaceutical giant Bayer (L, on September 8, 2016 in Leverkusen) and the logo of Monsanto at it's Belgian manufacturing site and operations centre (on May 24, 2016 in Lillo near Antwerp). - German pharmaceutical and chemical group Bayer is preparing to increase its takeover offer for US seeds and pesticides giant Monsanto for a fourth time, a report said on September 13, 2016. (Photo by Patrik STOLLARZ and John THYS / AFP)        (Photo credit should read PATRIK STOLLARZ,JOHN THYS/AFP/Getty Images)
Bayer rebuked by shareholders
02:07 - Source: CNN Business
CNN  — 

The fierce debate over whether glyphosate can cause cancer just got a big endorsement of safety from the US Environmental Protection Agency.

“EPA continues to find that there are no risks to public health when glyphosate is used in accordance with its current label and that glyphosate is not a carcinogen,” the agency said Tuesday.

The announcement comes after two high-profile court cases in which cancer patients claimed Roundup, a popular weedkiller containing glyphosate, caused their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

In both cases, jurors sided with the patients and said Monsanto, the maker of Roundup, should pay them tens of millions of dollars in damages.

Fallout from those verdicts – plus thousands of similar lawsuits against Monsanto – have dealt a huge financial blow to Monsanto’s parent company, Bayer.

Roundup cancer verdicts could cost Bayer billions

But the EPA’s announcement saying glyphosate is still safe was a boon for Bayer, which has insisted the same all along.

“Bayer firmly believes that the science supports the safety of glyphosate-based herbicides, which are some of the most thoroughly studied products of their kind, and is pleased that the regulators tasked with assessing this extensive body of science continue to reach favorable conclusions,” the company said.

But that doesn’t mean all concerns have been alleviated.

Why the debate keeps brewing

Cancer patients who used Roundup started suing Monsanto after the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer said glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic to humans.”

“For the herbicide glyphosate, there was limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans for non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” IARC said in a 2015 report.

But Monsanto said more than 800 studies have demonstrated glyphosate’s safety, including studies conducted internationally.

“In fact, since IARC classified glyphosate, regulatory authorities in the United States, Europe, Canada, Japan, New Zealand and Australia have publicly reaffirmed that glyphosate does not cause cancer,” a spokeswoman said.

Researchers from the University of Washington conducted an analysis and found that glyphosate raises the risk of cancer to those exposed to it by 41%,

“All of the meta-analyses conducted to date, including our own, consistently report the same key finding: exposure to GBHs (glyphosate-based herbicides) are associated with an increased risk of NHL,” or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, the authors wrote in a study published in the journal Mutation Research.

Timothy Litzenburg, who represented the first cancer patient to take Monsanto to trial, said the problem isn’t just glyphosate, it’s Roundup as a product.

“We are not alleging that our clients got cancer from glyphosate alone,” he said. “Roundup contains animal fats and other ingredients that increase the carcinogenicity of the glyphosate.”

He said the EPA doesn’t require sufficient testing, “particularly of the formulated product,” Roundup.

There also are concerns about whether Monsanto has had undue influence over regulators.

In a 2015 internal company email, a Monsanto executive wrote that an EPA official at the time offered to help stop another agency’s review of glyphosate, saying “If I can kill this I should get a medal.”

But a Monsanto spokeswoman said the company has never paid, given gifts to or done anything else to curry favor with anyone from the EPA.

Why glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world

Supporters say glyphosate is critical for global farming and helps minimize carbon emissions.

“Without glyphosate, farmers would need to rely on plowing (or what is known as tillage), a weed control technique that turns over the soil,” Bayer said.

“Tillage typically requires the use of heavy farm machinery, which increases fuel consumption and causes soil disruption, both of which release greenhouse gases, like CO2, that contribute to climate change.”

Disrupting the soil can also cause erosion, which would let vital nutrients be washed away with the soil, the company said.

“Glyphosate-based herbicides enable farmers to control weeds with little or no tillage, which dramatically reduces the carbon footprint and helps farmers maintain healthier soil,” Bayer said.

US Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue praised the EPA’s announcement that glyphosate doesn’t cause cancer.

“If we are going to feed 10 billion people by 2050, we are going to need all the tools at our disposal, which includes the use of glyphosate,” he said.