LYON, FRANCE - JULY 07:  Megan Rapinoe of the USA celebrates after scoring her team's first goal during the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup France Final match between The United States of America and The Netherlands at Stade de Lyon on July 07, 2019 in Lyon, France. (Photo by Richard Heathcote/Getty Images)
World Cup fans chant in support of equal pay
01:09 - Source: CNN
CNN  — 

With the World Cup over, the US Women’s National Team now has a real fight on its hands.

As the American women went unbeaten in the 2019 championship, capping their flawless run Sunday with a 2-0 victory over the Netherlands, it was hard to miss that they were playing for something bigger than a trophy.

Rapinoe seals win with a kiss

Forget the hullabaloo over the team’s purported arrogance or Alex Morgan irking the English with her tea-sipping celebration and focus on the message the Yanks hoped to send to the world: They deserve the same paychecks as their male counterparts.

Months before the tournament kicked off – on International Women’s Day, no less – stars Morgan, Carli Lloyd, Megan Rapinoe and Becky Sauerbrunn filed a lawsuit against the US Soccer Federation, claiming they deserve to be paid what the American men are paid for their international performances.

trump equal pay
Trump weighs in on equal pay for female athletes
01:59 - Source: CNN

In one hypothetical case cited in the lawsuit, if the women’s and men’s teams both won 20 straight games in a season, the women would make 38% what the men do.

“At this moment of tremendous pride for America, the sad equation remains all too clear, and Americans won’t stand for it anymore,” Molly Levinson, the players’ spokeswoman, said after Sunday’s win. “These athletes generate more revenue and garner higher TV ratings but get paid less simply because they are women. It is time for the Federation to correct this disparity once and for all.”

The federation denied the claim in May, saying the disparities were the product of business decisions rather than any efforts to discriminate, Sports Illustrated and other media outlets reported. The USSF also said the men and women are subject to different collective bargaining agreements, which are not made public.

Aside from the inevitable politics of any such debate, the issue is muddied because soccer operates on a much different revenue model than most American sports, yielding confusing media reports on the litigation.

Here’s what you need to know about the lawsuit:

It began with an EEOC claim

In 2016, the American foursome filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – yes, the same body that has workplace discrimination posters in your company breakroom – saying the USSF paid them less solely on the basis of their sex.

In February, the EEOC notified them of their right to sue, which they exercised the following month, alleging “institutional gender discrimination.”

While the lawsuit names the four and 24 of their teammates as plaintiffs, it also seeks to include anyone who has played for the squad since February 4, 2015. That was four days before the USWNT played its first practice game, or friendly, in preparation for the 2015 World Cup.

Next stop, mediation

The 25-page lawsuit filed in the US District Court for central California’s western division outlines the list of demands: class-action certification, back pay, interest, front pay, damages, attorneys’ fees and a permanent injunction preventing the USSF from engaging in discriminatory practices in the future.

The Cup is over, but you can still watch the women

First, though, the women must try to work things out with the USSF. They agreed to enter into mediation with their employer following Sunday’s World Cup final.

Performance and pay at international level

The issue has produced a lot of straw men, largely owing to a revenue and salary model that differs a great deal from most American sports.

nike ad uswnt womens world cup team usa equal pay stewart-binks sot nr vpx_00001830
Nike releases empowering ad after Team USA's win
01:28 - Source: CNN

Among the issues NOT on the table (and why):

  • The massive transfer fee that English club Chelsea paid for American Christian Pulisic (because transfer fees are generally paid between two teams, with the team acquiring the player then having to negotiate salary),
  • The men’s staggering annual salaries (because the bulk of that money, in most cases, comes from a player’s club, not his national team),
  • The amount of money FIFA, the sport’s international governing body, allots for winners of the men’s versus women’s World Cups (because those figures – like in horse racing or golf – are predetermined sums announced before the competition and vary according to projected revenue.)

The American women’s lawsuit focuses solely on the money and resources USWNT players receive from the USSF for representing their country at the international level.

In short, the women say they’ve exhibited the same skill and effort as the men, at times played more games and generated more money and performed far better at the international level – while receiving a fraction of the pay.

Specifics, please

With Sunday’s win, the USWNT secured their fourth World Cup title since the tournament began in 1991. The men have never won a World Cup, and they failed to qualify for the 2018 tournament in Russia. The women also have four Olympic gold medals. The men? Zilch.

The women, ranked No. 1 in the world for most of the last 11 years, claim to have better television ratings as well, a key factor in revenue figures. According to the lawsuit, the most-watched soccer game in American history was the USWNT’s 2015 World Cup final. Sunday’s final, according to Fox, was the “best metered market rating for a US soccer telecast since the 2015 FIFA Women’s World Cup final.”