Editor’s Note: James Griffiths is a Senior Producer for CNN International and author of “The Great Firewall of China: How to Build and Control an Alternative Version of the Internet.”

Hong Kong CNN  — 

Speaking to state media in late December, one of China’s top medical officials hailed eight residents of Wuhan who had attempted to blow the whistle on the coronavirus outbreak now devastating the country.

“In retrospect, we should highly praise them,” said Zeng Guang, chief epidemiologist at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CCDC). “They were wise before the outbreak.”

One of those whistleblowers, punished for spreading “rumors” as the city’s government continued to downplay the dangers of the virus, was Li Wenliang. A young doctor in one of Wuhan’s main hospitals, Li posted in a private group chat about the spread of a “SARS-like” virus.

“I only wanted to remind my university classmates to be careful,” he told CNN this week.

Li was speaking from his hospital bed, having succumbed to the virus himself. In the early hours of Friday morning, his condition worsened, and the 34-year-old died, becoming one of hundreds of fatalities from an outbreak that has spread well beyond Wuhan, affecting all of China and dozens of countries around the world.

If Li’s initial arrest was an embarrassment for the authorities, his death is a disaster.

Censorship crisis

The reaction on the Chinese internet as news of Li’s death spread was immediate – and almost unprecedented.

“Countless young people will mature overnight after today: the world is not as beautiful as we imagined,” one commenter wrote. “Are you angry? If any of us here is fortunate enough to speak up for the public in the future, please make sure you remember tonight’s anger.”

As the grief and rage poured out, those in charge of China’s vast censorship apparatus, the Great Firewall, seemed at a loss over what to do. Topics relating to censorship itself, usually absolutely verboten, trended for several hours before being deleted, rare evidence of indecision and confusion.

On Weibo, a Twitter-like platform, two hashtags – “The Wuhan government owes Dr. Li Wenliang an apology” and “We want freedom of speech” – attracted tens of thousands of views, before being deleted. Another hashtag, “I want freedom of speech,” drew more than 1.8 million views in the early hours of Friday morning, before it too was censored.

The anger over Li’s death was made worse by an apparent clumsy attempt to control the narrative, one that was highly reminiscent of the overreaction that led to his initial arrest.

Multiple state media outlets reported Li’s death late Thursday night, citing friends and doctors at Wuhan Central Hospital, only to subsequently delete them without explanation. The hospital claimed efforts to resuscitate Li were underway, but later issued a statement that he had died.

While it is possible that this was a mistake – and Chinese media wouldn’t be the first to misreport someone’s death – the suggestion that the censors’ hands were involved was enough to spark fury online.

“A doctor had to die twice,” wrote one user on the popular social media app WeChat. “That is national humiliation.”

Others pointed to the timing of the eventual confirmation, suggesting the authorities had tried to push the announcement until most people would be in bed so they could better control the reaction.

“I knew you would post this in the middle of the night,” wrote one user. “You think we’ve all gone to sleep? No. We haven’t.”

The fury and the pushback against the censorship apparatus itself has not been seen to this extent since the Wenzhou train crash in 2011, when authorities rushed to cover up the causes of a high-speed rail collision, even abandoning the search for survivors while many were still alive.

That incident became a lightning rod for frustrations about poor safety standards in China and the uncaring attitudes of the authorities, just as it appears Li’s death will be a conduit for anger over a host of issues beyond the virus.

Social stability

Li’s death and the authorities’ clumsy handling of it has exacerbated a crisis that is already shaking the very foundations of the Chinese state.

Since the transition from socialism to state capitalism and the brutal suppression of the 1989 Tiananmen Movement, China’s government has based its legitimacy on its ability to grow the economy, keeping its people safe and successful.