Kim Potter trial bodycam video vpx
Bodycam video shows different view of Daunte Wright's deadly police encounter
02:24 - Source: CNN
CNN  — 

A policing expert testified Wednesday that Kim Potter was not justified in using deadly force when the former officer fatally shot Daunte Wright during a traffic stop in suburban Minneapolis.

Video of the April 11 shooting shows that officers had pulled over Wright and tried to arrest him on an outstanding warrant when he got back in his vehicle and attempted to flee. Potter pulled out her firearm and shot him – later admitting she meant to use her Taser instead.

Seth Stoughton, a University of South Carolina School of Law associate professor testifying for the state, on Wednesday called Potter’s actions “excessive and inappropriate.”

Seth Stoughton, a University of South Carolina School of Law associate professor testifying for the state at Potter’s manslaughter trial Wednesday, called her actions “excessive and inappropriate.”

“The use of deadly force was not appropriate and the evidence suggests that a reasonable officer in Officer Potter’s position could not have believed it was proportional to the threat at the time,” the law professor testified.

Stoughton, who also testified at Chauvin’s trial, told jurors the deadly force used against Wright would have been proportional but “inappropriate because of the proximity of two other officers and the passenger.”

“The available evidence leads me to conclude that a reasonable officer in Officer Potter’s position would not have concluded that there was an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm and thus, that the use of deadly force was excessive, that is disproportionate to the threat presented,” Stoughton testified.

“And regardless of whether the reasonable officer would have perceived an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm, the use of deadly force under the circumstances was inappropriate because of the danger that it created to the other two officers and the passenger in Mr. Wright’s vehicle.”

Potter is charged with first- and second-degree manslaughter for killing Wright, a 20-year-old Black man. Potter, who is White, has pleaded not guilty. She is expected to testify in her own defense. The prosecution said it will rest its case on Thursday.

Prosecutors have argued Potter was negligent and acted recklessly in mistaking her gun for the Taser.

Wright’s father, Arbuey, fought back tears on the stand Wednesday when prosecutors – wrapping up their case – showed photos of him and his son. He recalled supervising his son at a store – “At work, I was his boss and home I’m your dad.”

The last witness on Wednesday was Wright’s father, Arbuey, who fought back tears when prosecutors showed photos of him and his son. He recalled supervising his son at a store – “At work, I was his boss and home I’m your dad.”

And the elder Wright described his son’s joy at becoming a father. “He was so happy,” Arbuey Wright recalled. “He loved his son.”

Earlier, a sergeant who trains police officers testified Potter’s use of a Taser would have been a “reasonable use of force.”

Brooklyn Center Police Sgt. Michael Peterson, who trains officers on Taser use, testified that, while the use of such a device would have been reasonable during the Wright traffic stop, officers can also use deadly force to stop suspects trying to get away.

Brooklyn Center Police Sgt. Michael Peterson, who trains officers on Taser use, testified that, while the use of such a device would have been reasonable during the Wright traffic stop, officers can also use deadly force to stop suspects trying to get away.

The decision on what type of force to use – a Taser or handgun, for instance – “has to be made in a very short amount of time,” Peterson, a witness for the state, testified under cross-examination.

“Mistakes can happen when someone confuses a Taser with a gun?” defense attorney Paul Engh asked the sergeant.

“Correct,” Peterson said.

Peterson said using a Taser to stop Wright would have been a “reasonable use of force.”

“If that was a training scenario that was put in front of me or one that I created for my officers, the use of a Taser would have been reasonable under those circumstances,” the sergeant told Engh during cross-examination.

Peterson told jurors that Potter at the time was using a new Taser that had come out at the beginning of 2021. She had never used a Taser in the field before, he testified.

Potter fully trained in Taser and use of force policy, commander testifies

On Tuesday, jurors heard from a suburban Minneapolis police commander that Potter was fully trained in her department’s Taser and use of force policies.

Brooklyn Center Police Cmdr. Garett Flesland, who oversees department training, testified for the prosecution Tuesday that shooting at occupants of a moving car is “rarely effective.” He said firing at a driver could result in the vehicle striking “something or somebody.”

Special agent Sam McGinnis of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension explains the differences between Kim Potter's service weapon and a Taser.

On cross examination, Flesland testified that deadly force can be used to save an officer reaching into the vehicle in an attempt to keep a suspect from getting away.

“Potentially yes, but I wasn’t there,” the commander testified, adding later that the threat to another officer leaning over the driver’s seat could be “severe and significant.”

Flesland testified that Potter was fully trained in department policies on use of force, including Tasers. Her most recent recertification on Taser use was in March 2021, he said.

Under questioning by defense lawyer Earl Gray, Flesland said of Potter: “She’s a good cop. She’s a good person. She’s a friend. I have no concerns going to calls with her.”

The prosecution objected – and the judge sustained the objection – after jurors heard the statements.

Earlier on Tuesday, Potter told the court that she wanted the judge, not the jury, to decide whether she should be subjected to a longer than typical sentence if convicted.

Investigator outlines differences between gun and Taser

Tuesday’s testimony came after a Minnesota state investigator outlined key differences between Potter’s service weapon and a Taser.

Special agent Sam McGinnis of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension on Monday described the Taser and gun differences in appearance, weight and positioning on Potter’s utility belt. McGinnis is a state investigative agent responsible for reviewing police shootings.

“The Taser is yellow; the firearm is black,” McGinnis said during questioning by the prosecution. “The Taser has a stocky body to it compared to the Glock handgun. The grip of the Taser is shorter and wider than the Glock.”

A Taser is shown on the left and a Glock to the right.

McGinnis’ analysis of the two weapons revealed marked differences in weight. Potter’s Glock handgun weighed 2.11 pounds, McGinnis said, compared to her Taser that weighed less than a pound. McGinnis said this meant the Glock with the ammo weighed over twice as much as the Taser.

The state investigator also described differences in the ways the two weapons are fired.

“The Glock trigger is curved,” McGinnis told the jury. “The Taser trigger is flat with some serrations cut into it. The Taser has an external, I guess, ‘on’ (and) ‘off’ switch safety. The Glock does not.”

McGinnis also testified that he took photos of Potter after the shooting, which showed she kept her firearm and Taser on opposite sides of her body.

“Her firearm was on her dominant side, which you’d have to use your right hand to draw,” he said, noting her holster had a snap retention system to keep the gun in its holster.

The Taser, in contrast, was holstered on her left side, and required her to push a lever with her left hand to pull it from the holster.

Wright died from single gunshot wound to the chest, medical examiner says

Potter killed Wright by firing a single bullet to his chest, said Dr. Lorren Jackson, assistant medical examiner at the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s Office.

Jackson said Monday the gunshot wound was the sole cause of death for Wright and his manner of death was homicide.

“Was this a survivable injury?” the prosecutor asked Jackson.

No, he responded. Survival times for such an injury would be just seconds to minutes, he told the jury.

Immediately after the shooting, Wright’s car veered across traffic and crashed into an occupied vehicle.

Wright had superficial, blunt force injuries to his face, including abrasions and lacerations to the lip, Jackson testified Monday. Yet he affirmed that the gunshot wound, which struck Wright’s heart, was the sole cause of death.

CNN’s Julia Jones, Brad Parks, Kim Berryman, Josh Campbell, Eric Levenson and Amir Vera contributed to this report.