Wind turbines spin at the Traverse wind farm in Oklahoma on April 19.

Driving west from Oklahoma City to the outskirts of Weatherford, wind turbines don’t just dot the landscape; they dominate it.

From oil and gas booms and busts to heavy rains followed by drought, Oklahoma is no stranger to extremes. One constant is the wind, which is so bracingly strong that what locals call a breeze will send hats flying and whip open car doors suddenly.

“We’ve always had the wind in Oklahoma,” said Melva Dickey, a 91-year-old landowner and retired farmer.

Dickey leases her land to Ohio-based utility American Electric Power. With four turbines on her property, she — along with more than 300 other landowners — are harnessing the state’s most plentiful natural resource.

Melva Dickey.
Cows graze near Weatherford.

Far from the coasts, wind energy is thriving here in America’s heartland, on the vast plains of Oklahoma, Texas and Nebraska. Long an area devoted to oil and gas, Western Oklahoma is now home to one of the largest wind farms in the world.

The Traverse wind farm is made up of 356 turbines — each rising about 300 feet above the ground and spread out across 220,000 acres. The turbines tower over shimmering fields of wheat and give shade to cattle munching on hay. As they spin, they generate close to 1 gigawatt of energy; together with two other AEP-owned wind farms nearby, the trio will make enough electricity to power 440,000 homes each year.

Wind turbines are an icon for the energy transition and the subject of heated debate in Washington. They’ve been mocked by prominent members of the GOP, including former President Donald Trump, who recently called wind the “worst form of energy.”

But Weatherford Mayor Mike Brown told CNN that for the landowners in Western Oklahoma, the sound of a huge metal blade cutting through the atmosphere is “the sound of money.” For people who have long lived with wind whipping across their flat land, using it to make electricity is common sense.

Scott Hampton feeds the cattle on his farm.
Wind turbines are seen in the distance from Scott Hampton's truck as he drives on a county road in Weatherford.

“People look at it like, ‘Okay, I don’t see the negative of it,’” Brown said. “The landowners are benefiting; we’ve benefitted from the workers. It’s ‘how does it affect us?’ Some things we can’t control, this is something we can.”

The farmers who lease their land for wind energy hope it brings new financial stability to the area. Those who spoke with CNN said AEP will deliver 6-month payments to landowners based on how much electricity their turbines generate, as well as a base payment. Even people leasing land without a turbine on it will get a yearly check.

“As long as they’re spinning, they’re making us money,” said Scott Hampton, who farms a small herd of cattle and works at the local school. “In my view, it’s not a fight; it’s what can we do that’s good for the environment.”

A red-state boom

A worker walks along the base of a wind turbine at the Traverse wind farm.

Wind energy is on the brink of a massive expansion in the next few years, data from the US Energy Information Administration shows. Of the wind projects becoming operational this year, Traverse is by far the biggest.

Wind energy is the fourth-largest electricity source behind natural gas, coal and nuclear. Wind generated near 380 terawatt-hours of energy in 2021, according to the EIA, which projects another 7.6 gigawatts of utility-scale wind will be brought online this year (a terawatt is a thousand times bigger than a gigawatt).

Much of the country’s current wind capacity is on land, and President Joe Biden’s administration is focusing on building off the coasts, with a goal of getting 30 gigawatts of offshore wind energy online by the end of the decade. Still, many of the biggest offshore projects won’t come online until 2024 at the earliest.

While the offshore wind industry has been particularly slow to get off the ground — driven in part by objections from some wealthy and well-connected Democrats and Republicans alike that wind turbines ruin the view — wind energy is booming in deep-red Republican states in the central US.

Texas, in addition to being an oil and gas giant, is also a wind behemoth. In 2020, Texas generated more electricity from wind than Iowa, Kansas, and Oklahoma — the next three highest states — combined, according to the EIA. Still, because Texas is massive and both generates and uses the most total electricity out of any state in the nation, wind only accounted for 20% of its generated electricity.

Wind generated a higher proportion of electricity in Iowa (57%), Kansas (44%), and Oklahoma (36%). And in the Southwest Power Pool — which is the grid for Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana and other states — renewable power is steadily growing.

Non-hydropower renewables generated nearly 94 billion kilowatt-hours on that grid in 2021 and are poised to grow to nearly 115 billion kilowatt-hours by 2023, according to the EIA. In comparison, non-hydro renewables generated just 7 billion kilowatt-hours for New York’s grid in 2021.

The wind whips at an American flag.

There are a few reasons wind is thriving in the middle of the country, said Ben King, a senior analyst at the nonpartisan think tank Rhodium Group. It’s an ideal location for consistent wind, it’s easier to build big projects in states that have streamlined their permitting process, and there are more utilities serving the area looking to invest in renewables.

“It has made it easier for wind developers to come in and put wind farms there,” King said.

For big utility companies like AEP, renewables make more sense to invest in from a cost and risk standpoint. Unlike fuels like coal and natural gas, the wind is free and the cost of wind energy is dropping steeply.

“All those investments are more risky than a renewables investment,” AEP CEO Nick Akins told CNN. “We’re moving towards a clean energy economy; nothing’s going to stop that.”

A 300-foot office

Lance Hull, a plant manager at Traverse.
A ladder runs up the inside of a wind turbine at the Traverse wind farm. Workers must climb up nearly 300 feet in order to perform inspections and maintenance on the turbines.

On a blustery April morning, Traverse plant manager Lance Hull pointed to the end of a turbine blade that was bending slightly with the wind. That slight flex is how Hull knows the wind is blowing at optimal speed to generate electricity.

“We want as much wind to hit that blade and push it as we can actually catch,” Hull told CNN.

The machines do a lot of the work themselves. Standing under a turbine, you can sometimes hear the motor that pivots the blades so they face whatever way the wind is blowing. The turbines themselves can also adjust to spin slower or faster than the wind — trying to maintain the most favorable speed to generate electricity.

“The machine actually takes into account the fact that we can’t control the power that pushes the machine because it is wind,” Hull said. “You can’t control the wind.”

Even though Hull’s title is “plant manager,” there is no plant at Traverse in the sense of a traditional coal- or gas-run power plant. Instead, Hull and his crew of about 50 workers spend their days driving, doing spot checks and maintenance on their turbines — which usually means climbing up the turbines themselves.

Blake Panek, senior wind technician, performs a routine inspection inside one of the wind turbines at the Traverse wind farm. To his left is Matt Miller, environmental coordinator principal at Traverse.
The traverse wind farm as seen from the top of one of the turbines.

“Your office is at 300 feet,” said Blake Panek, a senior wind technician at AEP who works on Hull’s crew.

Climbing and being comfortable with heights is an essential part of being a wind technician. Decked out in a safety harness and attached to a pulley system, Panek charged up a ladder in the inside of the wind towers — scaling the first section in a matter of seconds.

Hull has been with AEP for years, but recently made the switch from a natural gas power plant to the wind farm. And in terms of the number of employees, he doesn’t see a big difference. He estimated his old gas plant had about 30-40 people employed, whereas his wind crew makes up about 50.

“There are a lot of jobs with the wind farm that you don’t have at the typical power plant,” Hull said. “Industries change, things change, but there’s a lot of automation in the gas plants as well. It’s automatic control, people monitoring operations. It’s very similar.”

‘Magnificent structures’

The morning sun illuminates a turbine near Weatherford.

The smallest wind turbines in Weatherford are the ones adorning Mayor Mike Brown’s business card holder on his desk.

Turbines are something of a mascot for Weatherford, a small city that’s home to about 12,000 people but is an economic hub in the area. There’s a massive turbine blade outside city hall on which a local artist painted a colorful mural.

Brown initially had another idea for it: Covering the blade in sandpaper and hoisting it upright on historic Route 66 — “the world’s largest nail file.”

“I got shot down so quickly,” Brown laughed. “I really thought I’d come up with something.”

Wind power isn’t political in this part of the country. The two Oklahoma counties that Traverse spans — Blaine and Custer — voted overwhelmingly for Trump in the 2020 election. But the divisive debate over clean energy vs. fossil fuel doesn’t really factor into the conversation here.

Weatherford Mayor Mike Brown.
A turbine blade lies outside the Weatherford city hall. A local artist is in the process of painting a mural on it.

To hear Brown tell it, the wind boom took off after oil and gas started to decline in the area.

“Really, when the oil fields kind of slowed down, the wind energy picked up,” Brown said. “It really was at a good time for us as far as not seeing a big drop-off.”

Brown’s point speaks to something a lot of people in Western Oklahoma understand. Having lived through multiple boom-and-bust cycles for oil and gas, they’re keenly aware that fossil fuel is a finite resource. And though oil and natural gas are clearly still a big employer in the area, land owners and local officials see wind energy and jobs as complementing fossil fuels, not taking away from them.

“We have a tradition in Oklahoma of being energy producers,” said Rep. Frank Lucas, who has long represented Western Oklahoma in Congress. “We’ve always been oil and gas. It’s only inevitable that as the other forms of energy have been developed, we would be a part of that.”

Lucas, the ranking member on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, says he believes electricity will eventually be carbon-free — and that wind can be a big part of that. Biden has vowed to get the nation’s electricity to be zero-emissions by 2035; whether or not that goal can be met will ultimately depend on many more projects like Traverse coming online.

A single oil pumpjack sits in a field in Weatherford.
The zone 2 substation at the Traverse wind farm.

“In the modern era, we are producers of a lot of wind power, but we can produce more,” Lucas said of his district. “The kind of power we’re talking about is a transition power. We’ll get to an emissions-free primary power source.”

Of course, not everyone is happy with the windmills. On quiet days, the whooshing sound is more noticeable and the spinning blades can cast a flicker of sunlight on bright days. At night, the red lights on the windmills all blink at the same time to ward off airplanes.

“It’s visual pollution,” landowner Melva Dickey admitted, but she still thinks the turbines are “magnificent structures.”

“They’re pretty,” she said. “When the clouds are deep blue and the sun is shining on those turbines, it’s gorgeous.”

Thinking about the future