Opinion: American Islam gets this beautiful thing right

Islamic Center of Greater Cincinnati during Ramadan services

Haroon Moghul's latest book is "Two Billion Caliphs: A Vision of a Muslim Future." His Substack, Sunday Schooled, helps Muslim parents raise Muslim kids. The views expressed here are his own. Read more opinion on CNN.

(CNN)Out of the world's nearly 2 billion Muslims, only about 4 million are Americans. So it's not surprising that many of us often assume we have little relevance to the immediate concerns, let alone future prospects, of the ummah, the global Muslim community. But at a time when Muslims everywhere are searching for new visions, American Islam has something special to offer.

Haroon Moghul
That's not to say we've done everything right, or even achieved the right outcomes for the right reasons, but we've preserved something essential from Islam's past without which there can be no promising or prosperous Islam in the years to come. To explain why, consider Eid al-Fitr, the big holiday that marks the end of Ramadan.
    It's soon... ish. I only say that because my Eid and yours may not fall on the same day.
      For peculiarly American reasons, many American Muslims might celebrate the same Eid on a different date. Even between kith and kin: My immediate family lives in Ohio. But some of my extended family, like my dad, live in Maryland. (Same time zone, mind you.) Of course, I plan to call the Maryland Moghuls and wish them an Eid Mubarak. I just don't know when their Eid will be.
      To the average American, this might sound strange. Before you call your parents to wish them a Merry Christmas, you don't have to confirm that you're all celebrating Christmas on the same day. But on a consistent basis, many American Muslims have no idea, up to and including the day beforehand, exactly when they'll be celebrating their holiest holidays.
      That's because we track our religious calendar by the moon. But we don't agree on how to track the moon. Some Muslims (let's say Team A) contend it's entirely sufficient to astronomically calculate lunar phases in advance, meaning that they'll know how to organize their sacred obligations years ahead.
        A picture taken early on February 27, 2022 shows a crescent of moon above the 4506 meters high Weisshorn mountain in the Swiss alps from Crans-Montana, Switzerland.
        Others (let's say Team B) believe astronomical calculation isn't sufficient. They hold that someone qualified must actually see the first crescent moon as well (of course, it has to be an astronomically viable sighting by someone who won't mix up the moon for Mars). This is a live dispute. Sometimes a minefield. For while I'm with Team B, our local mosque is Team A.
        Meanwhile, my father's mosque sides with Team B, although he himself believes that the calendar should be anchored to Mecca, no matter where you are (Team C?). For many Muslims, especially outside America, this debate is an anachronism at best. A centralized body, often government-run or backed, decides such things for everyone.
        As a recent Pew analysis finds, "Islam is the most common government-endorsed faith," which holds in places as diverse as Southeast Asia and West Africa. Even where there is no state religion, many Muslim-majority countries, from Turkey to Indonesia, feature centralized clerical bodies or offer some degree of state protection to designated faiths.
        Of course, calendrically speaking at least, there's a benefit to that level of coordination. After all, what's the logic in not knowing when your most important religious occasions are set to commence? Unless you consider this minor hindrance a condensed symbol, a small thing that stands in for a much bigger truth, a challenge that is more so an opportunity. As I do.
        Because America (mercifully) has no single Muslim directorate, neighboring mosques, even from the same denominations, might celebrate Eid (or, for that matter, start Ramadan) on different days.
        It's as if some churches did Christmas on December 24 and others in the exact same town went with December 25. Further, though, it's as if several didn't know which day it'd be until December 23. And then the next year it was 11 days (give or take a day) before one of those days. (The lunar year being shorter than the solar year, Ramadan reverses through the seasons on a 33-year rhythm.) The next time Ramadan will overlap with all of April, as it did this year, is roundabout 2055.
        I hope that even then, in 2055, we'll still be disagreeing.
        Of course, when I was growing up, plenty of Muslims used to get quite irked by such disunion (even though we seem fine with the idea that when we start and stop fasting each day differs by geography). Often these frustrated Muslims didn't like the idea that all of us couldn't concur. Sometimes they considered our divergence damning evidence of a broader deficiency, with worrisome consequences for Muslim cooperation on more urgent matters.
        The more I reflect on it, though, the more I suspect it's the other way around. Because we have too little experience embracing disagreement, we don't cooperate and collaborate all that effectively. Maybe an additional reason the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, modeled variations in his prayer, his recitation of the Qur'an, and in a number of other areas wasn't just to create flexibility in those specific things.
        But perhaps it was also to empower his followers to live Islam in his absence, as one day they would have to -- a Prophet, yes, but also still a mortal man. The lunar debate reveals what Islam was meant to be and, I pray, what Islam could be again. Orbiting this simple, significant truth: Because Muhammad is the last Prophet, there's no revelation after him.
        Upholding that is one of two conditions of becoming and staying Muslim. (The first is unitarian monotheism.) After the Prophet's passing and forevermore, there will never again be anyone who can conclusively decide on a matter. This design feature, this core consequence of the Islamic creed, should hearten democrats and deject despots.
        Because it means there's no Islam without each of us having the rights and responsibilities that flow from moral agency. We can and should create communities to translate our strengths and priorities into the world, but none of these should impose on any other -- and all of these should start and end with the sacred status of the individual in Islam.
        After all, we are judged by God individually. And that which God holds each individual accountable for, no one should deny.
        Of course, they can -- practically speaking.
        But then they'll have to answer for it -- theologically speaking. (It's called the afterlife.)
        American Islam doesn't just present a provocative contrast with rigidly hierarchical interpretations of Islam, but actually also -- dare I say -- more closely approximates the founding Islamic spirit. And we'll desperately need that egalitarianism, flexibility and nuance if we're going to thrive in the future that accelerates toward us.
        From climate change to cultural secularization, from rapidly growing populations to the turbulence introduced by disruptive new technologies, we face too many challenges and too much uncertainty not to invest in autonomy. A dynamic, flexible ummah -- a web of overlapping sentiments -- would be much more likely to prepare us for a fast-changing future.
        Get our free weekly newsletter

        Sign up for CNN Opinion's newsletter.

        Join us on Twitter and Facebook

        For two pandemic years, many Muslims couldn't practice their religion the way they would've wished. But many more can't -- not because of Covid, but because people in power decide what is and isn't Islam. Their Islam or not-Islam. It's no wonder there's a rising tide