A Fridays For Future protest in Germany in 2019. International climate experts welcome the US climate measures, but said the country needs to do more.
CNN  — 

The Democrats’ $369 billion climate package, the largest such investment in US history, could have significant implications for global greenhouse gas emissions and the US’ standing in the world, after months of uncertainty in Congress undermined the Biden administration’s claims that “America is back.”

US officials are hoping it puts them in a better position for difficult negotiations to come: the international climate talks in Egypt this fall.

The inability of US lawmakers to pass federal climate legislation has for years been a black eye for the country’s international delegates at global climate talks. The Trump years were a low point, but even at COP26 in Glasgow last year, President Joe Biden and US Climate Envoy John Kerry’s calls to action did not have the necessary legislative weight behind them.

Kerry and Biden now have billions of legislative investments in clean energy to tout when they go to COP27 in November, which US lawmakers and experts say is a gamechanger.

“I think we all felt like we were walking through the desert with no hope of finding water, and the vultures were starting to circle,” Heather Zichal, CEO of trade group American Clean Power and a former Obama White House climate official, told CNN. “We’re now talking about over $360 billion [of climate investment]. It’s really apples and oranges in terms of what you can get.”

US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry attends Portugal's Council of State in June.

But while the bill is being welcomed overseas, there’s an overarching feeling that the US is simply catching up to its allies after years of inaction. Pressure has also increased for the US to take financial responsibility for its historic role in the crisis.

“It’s obviously a good thing but it’s important not to get carried away,” Bob Ward, policy and communications director at the London-based Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, told CNN of the bill.

Ward said the bill gave the pledges the US had already made a “degree of credibility,” but what much of the world wants to see the US commit to significant climate finance – funds to help the most vulnerable countries reduce emissions and adapt to the crisis.

“The issues that are still key in the discussions are not really addressed by this bill – there’s nothing in the bill on international climate finance, which is a bit worrying,” Ward said. “Leadership is now required from the rich countries in climate finance.”

Climate finance wouldn’t typically be included in the kind of tax and climate bill Democrats are preparing to pass, and Biden has asked for climate finance in his 2023 budget. But the US has a history of pushing back against international calls for financial tools. At last year’s talks, the US was against a loss-and-damage scheme that would compensate impacted countries for the harm the climate crisis has done.

Still, if the bill is passed, lawmakers and experts said it would represent a serious boost in Biden’s ability to make good on his international climate commitments. It would put the US on a path to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 31-44% below 2005 levels by the end of the decade, according to nonpartisan climate think tank Rhodium Group. Biden has pledged to cut US emissions in half by 2030.

“All of a sudden, we can show up at these conferences with not just rhetorical leadership but policy leadership,” Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut told CNN. “It makes it a lot harder for laggard countries to claim that the US is talking out of both sides of its mouth – and use that as an excuse to sit on the sidelines.”

China-US tensions could overshadow progress

While the bill allocates a historic amount of money to climate and clean energy, it’s also trying to achieve something bigger – competitiveness with China in renewables and manufacturing jobs at home, too.

The bill contains $60 billion towards domestic clean energy manufacturing and $30 billion for a production credit tax credit for wind, solar and battery storage. Its electric vehicles tax credit is written to incentivize US manufacturing, or manufacturing in countries with which the US has a free trade agreement, like Canada and Mexico.

But China has cornered the market on manufacturing solar panels and EV batteries, and American lawmakers and experts have long warned that the US will fall behind if Congress doesn’t invest in a domestic supply chain with funding and tax credits.

Murphy and Democratic Sen. John Hickenlooper of Colorado told CNN they hoped the bill would encourage a productive rivalry with China – pushing the world’s largest emitter (the US is now the second largest) to do more to decarbonize.

“China is our rival. They’re going to be paying very close attention to this and I guarantee you’re they’re going to come out and show they’re going to do even more and better than we can,” Hickenlooper said. “If you look at how much solar and wind China’s been implementing in the last few years, it’s been dramatic. Now they’re going to have to ramp it up even more because we’re going after it.”

China's special climate envoy Xie Zhenhua speaks at the World Economic Forum at Davos in May.

The US-China rivalry had for decades stymied climate negotiations before the 2015 Paris Agreement. But a climate partnership between the two nations announced last year in Glasgow gave hope that the world’s two biggest polluters might just cooperate enough to put a real dent in emissions.

But that is now on hold. On Friday, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it would suspend bilateral climate change talks, after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s trip to Taiwan. The two nations had been cooperating on climate even when tensions escalated in other arenas in recent years.

Sam Geall, CEO of the think tank China Dialogue, told CNN that he doesn’t believe the US legislation would have had much of an impact on China’s climate decisions.

“China has its own concerns, like the fallout of the Russian invasion, macroeconomics, Covid lockdowns, and its critical National Congress conference in the autumn,” Geall said. “Even if there were such a positive shift, I’m not sure it’d be that impactful on the COP, given the other issues distracting attention and stoking tensions at the moment.”

Ward cautioned the US to stay humble in the lead up to the November summit and remember how the whiplash of the Trump administration reoriented international politics on climate.

“The US is kind of just playing catch-up, and I do worry sometimes the United States has forgotten that the world did not stand still for those years of the Trump administration, when it got on with things,” Ward said. “To some extent, there’s been a change in the world order, and the US cannot dominate in the same way as it did before.”