The Business of Sanctions
By Michael Weisskopf and Adam Zagorin
It looked like the kind of moment that opposition researchers
spend their lives trying to unearth. Just as 13 Iranian Jews
stood in the prisoner's dock of an Islamic court on espionage
charges last June, Halliburton CEO Dick Cheney delivered a
notably discordant message. At a meeting of the World Petroleum
Congress, Cheney called for a quick end to U.S. economic
sanctions against Iran, which was in the process of negotiating
$8 billion in oil and gas contracts with his firm's foreign
rivals. "We're kept out of there primarily by our own
government," said Cheney. "I think that's a mistake."
It's rare for a corporate chieftain to earn a place on a
national ticket. And Cheney's years as head of an industrial
giant that extracts natural resources and operates in unstable
and undemocratic places would seem an inviting target. Right
after George W. Bush gave Cheney the vice-presidential nod,
traditionally Democratic supporters ranging from
environmentalists to labor unions to plaintiffs' lawyers were
sharpening their knives. "Cheney's record at the company is not
well known but will be scrutinized very closely," predicted
former Congressman Lee Hamilton, a moderate Democrat.
"Politically, this becomes a very important matter."
But it could prove difficult to exploit politically. For one
thing, Cheney has won high marks for his stewardship at
Dallas-based Halliburton, transforming it into the world's
largest provider of oil-field services. He arrived in 1995 and
boosted the fortunes of a company beset by low oil prices and
slow growth, raising revenues to $15 billion. Cheney's
high-level contacts in Washington and around the world helped
bring in business. Under Cheney, the company's Brown & Root
construction subsidiary has worked hand in hand with the
Democratic Administration--as it had done before him with the
Bush White House--acting as a virtual arm of the Federal
Government to provide food and housing for U.S. military forces
abroad in trouble spots ranging from Somalia to Bosnia.
Where Al Gore may have luck galvanizing opposition to Bush's
choice is, of all places, in Cheney's unchecked faith in free
trade. His opposition to U.S. sanctions against pariah states
has raised hackles even among some G.O.P. stalwarts.
Halliburton, for example, lobbied mightily to normalize trade
with China, a position that put Cheney at odds with many
conservative Christians and a sizable minority of Republicans
who regard Beijing as a national-security threat. The powerful
American Israel Public Affairs Committee disagrees with his
views on U.S. investment in Iran. Says A.I.P.A.C. spokesman Ken
Bricker: "Now is absolutely not the time to lift sanctions and
appear to condone Tehran's totally unacceptable behavior." Many
Cuban Americans oppose his idea for easing trade with Havana by
setting up an enterprise zone on the U.S. naval base at
Guantanamo--a position that goes well beyond anything Bush has
proposed. Even so, Cheney knows that his stance plays well in
corporate America. Telling Louisiana oilmen last fall that
Gore's energy policy was "stupid," he said, "There's no better
time to tell [our story] than campaign time."
|