Biden begins transition plans as Trump refuses to concede

President Trump said the federal government won't deliver a possible coronavirus vaccine until the state's governor, Andrew Cuomo, lets the administration "know when he is ready for it."

President Trump's term ends when President-elect Joe Biden is sworn in on Jan. 20. 

What this is about: Last month, Cuomo called the White House Covid-19 Task Force’s vaccination plan “deeply flawed." At that time, Cuomo said he was on a call with members of the national task force when he learned that the premise of the federal vaccination plan would be to use private pharmacies — like CVS and Walgreens — as the main distribution point for the vaccine.

“That is a very limited distribution mechanism,” Cuomo said, adding that the federal plan does not appear to provide for states to organize vaccination with state personnel on any scale.

Days later after his initial comments, Cuomo said the plan, as explained to him by the White House, involves the military distributing a future Covid-19 vaccine to large chain-pharmacies for distribution, a plan he said would disproportionately limit distribution in communities of color.

Today, Trump said the US government can't deliver the vaccine "to a state that won't be giving it to its people immediately."

"So we won't be delivering it to New York until we have authorization to do so and that pains me to say that," Trump said at an ongoing news conference. "This is a very successful, amazing vaccine at 90% and more, but — so the governor, Gov. Cuomo, will have to let us know when he is ready for it," Trump said.

Watch the moment:

President Trump is giving an update on Operation Warp Speed from the Rose Garden.

This will be the first time the President has spoken publicly since CNN and other networks projected on Saturday that Joe Biden would win the presidency.

Trump last spoke publicly on Nov. 5, when he baselessly claimed the presidency was being stolen from underneath him.

Watch:

Republican Sen. Martha McSally issued a statement Friday conceding the Arizona Senate race to Democrat Mark Kelly.

CNN projected last Friday that the Democrat and former astronaut had defeated McSally in Arizona’s special election.

The Republican National Committee is set to invest at least $20 million in the upcoming dual Georgia Senate Runoff elections that will determine which party controls the majority in the US Senate.

Spokesperson Mandi Merritt told CNN that in addition to the hefty financial investment, the RNC is also planning on sending more than 600 staffers into Georgia to help support the campaigns of Sens. David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler.

This news was first reported by the Associated Press.

The Carter Center announced today it will monitor the ongoing hand recount of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia to "help bolster transparency and confidence in election results."

It's the first time the nonprofit, which has observed elections around the world, will monitor any part of an election process in the United States.

The move comes after an extraordinary and prolonged effort by President Trump and top Republicans to undermine confidence in the election's outcome by baselessly claiming fraud and refusing to recognize President-elect Joe Biden's victory.

For more than three decades, the organization, founded by former President Jimmy Carter and former first lady Rosalyn Carter, has helped support democratic elections in countries during fragile and volatile times. 

Georgia's Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger announced Wednesday that the state will conduct an audit of race, which includes all counties recounting, by hand, the nearly 5 million ballots cast.

Today the Carter Center said it will dispatch monitors to several county audit boards across the Peach State to watch the recount. It did not monitor voters when they cast ballots last week and the organization said this review is "not part of a broader assessment of the election as a whole."

Soyia Ellison, a spokesperson for The Carter Center, confirmed to CNN that Georgia will be the first time the organization has been involved in monitoring any part of a US election. 

Read the full article here.

President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team is reaching out to former Pentagon officials who worked for former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis as they seek to gather information for an incoming Biden team, according to two former officials who have been contacted by the transition team. 

The conversations are the result of the inability to engage with current Pentagon officials at this time, the sources told CNN. And they come as an effort to build the transition team’s understanding about what has happened in the department over the last four years. Reaching out to former officials is “the next best thing,” one of the former officials explained.

Politico was the first to report on the communications.

More background: The Biden team is also aware that even when they are able to speak with current defense officials after the General Services Administration formally signs off on Biden’s victory, they may not be eager to engage or be as forthcoming as the officials who have already departed.  

During some of these discussions people on the Biden transition team have sometimes referred to conversations with “Mattis people,” the second former official said, indicating that they are speaking to a group of these former officials.

But the Biden transition team – focused on information gathering – has not indicated that they want to hire these former officials who worked for Mattis.

“It is nice that I am not completely toxic because I was a Trump nominee, but I do not think that they would want to fill the place up with officials who were confirmed under Trump. They are not discussing a job with me,” the official said. “I am just being as helpful as I can be.” 

The Biden transition team declined to comment.

A senior federal election security official, who is an appointee of President Trump, has blasted the President’s post-election claims calling them baffling, laughable and insulting.

They’re the strongest rejection from a Trump administration official so far of what the President is saying.

Remember: Last Saturday major news organizations, including CNN, projected Joe Biden will win the presidential election. Since then, Trump has continued to make baseless allegations of widespread voter fraud despite no evidence, and he's launched a series of legal challenges to the results.

Ben Hovland was nominated by Trump last year and unanimously confirmed by the Senate. He runs the Election Assistance Commission which, in part, tests and certifies voting machines. He also works closely with other federal agencies that oversee elections, like CISA — the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.

Asked what he would say to Trump about the election, he said "these conspiracy theories that are flying around, have consequences."

In response to Trump’s tweet that millions of his votes were deleted, Hovland calls it "pretty baffling." 

"I just wish that if claims like that were going to be made, they would actually be backed up with something credible. I think those types of statements matter. They cause Americans to lose confidence in the process," Hovland said.

The legal process that is taking place is very different than what we hear from the President and his aides, Hovland added. 

"We see bold statements on Twitter or at the podium and we see hearsay and we see laughable evidence presented to courts," Hovland said. "There's just not a correlation between those."

Hovland’s comments come as CISA Director Chris Krebs is also ratcheting up his rebukes of the President’s claims.

The Department of Homeland Security along with a group of national, state and private election officials said in a joint statement Thursday that there is no evidence of any voting system being compromised in the 2020 election despiteTrump's deluge of election fraud conspiracies. They called the election "the most secure in American history."

A senior administration official told CNN that CIA Director Gina Haspel has been iced out of an intelligence meeting that was to take place at the White House Friday that included President Trump, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe and other top intelligence officials. 

The official acknowledged that while her attendance is not mandatory, it doesn’t bode well for Haspel, although some of the President’s advisers and outside Republican allies continue to try to talk him out of firing her in this critical transition period.

The CIA declined to comment when asked if Haspel was iced out of the meeting. The White House has not responded to a request for comment.

A source familiar with recent discussions about Haspel’s potential firing told CNN that it is not surprising she was excluded from this meeting given the recent tension between her and Ratcliffe. 

Some more context: Ratcliffe is in charge of the agenda for Oval Office meetings of this nature and the Presidential Daily Brief is compiled by the Office of the Director for National Intelligence based on intelligence from various agencies, including CIA.

CNN reported Thursday that some Trump advisers believe Haspel has been "insubordinate" to both the President and Ratcliffe, arguing she routinely circumvents the chain of command to further her own agenda and that of the CIA.

But while multiple sources have told CNN they expect the President to fire Haspel, they have also emphasized that nothing is set in stone until Trump makes an announcement.

A Republican congressional candidate from Pennsylvania lost a case on appeal over ballots in Pennsylvania that arrived late. 

Jim Bognet, who also lost his race in Pennsylvania's 8th Congressional District, filed the appeal just before Election Day.

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the case today saying the voters and the candidate, Bognet, didn't have the ability to sue and had gone to court too close to the election.

The appellate decision was in line with the lower court's ruling in the case.

It's the third court development just today that undercuts Republican attempts to push disinformation about election fraud in court.

The issue of the legality of those ballots was already at the US Supreme Court – and is still there. But Bognet and the voters had added to the effort in their own federal case that challenged those ballots, claiming that late-arriving absentee ballots in Pennsylvania hurt their Constitutional rights because they were potentially illegally cast votes.  

The ruling on Friday – which will govern federal courts in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania – also appears to block voters from making broad, theoretical claims under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution about the possible dilution of their votes.

Lawyers representing Republicans in other suits since Election Day have tried to make similar Constitutional arguments to block Biden's win in states including Pennsylvania.