June 24, 2022 Roe v. Wade news

By Adrienne Vogt, Aditi Sangal, Elise Hammond, Meg Wagner and Veronica Rocha, CNN

Updated 8:19 a.m. ET, June 25, 2022
20 Posts
Sort byDropdown arrow
11:31 a.m. ET, June 24, 2022

Texas attorney general says abortion now illegal in state and declares June 24 a holiday for his office

From CNN's Roxanne Garcia

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks at a conference in 2021.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks at a conference in 2021. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in his statement on the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade announced the statewide closure of his agency’s offices Friday “in honor of the nearly 70 million unborn babies killed in the womb since 1973,” according to a release from the attorney general’s office. 

“Roe v. Wade and its successor case Planned Parenthood v. Casey have absolutely no basis in the U.S. Constitution,” said Paxton. “Nevertheless, for half a century, Americans have had to live under these illegitimate, illegal, and unconstitutional dictates of a partisan, willful Supreme Court. No more. Today, the question of abortion returns to the states. And in Texas, that question has already been answered: abortion is illegal here. I look forward to defending the pro-life laws of Texas and the lives of all unborn children moving forward.”  

 “Further,” Paxton added, “we cannot forget the extraordinary violence that Roe and Casey unleashed on our nation. Because of those decisions, almost 70 million babies have been killed in the womb. And so, today at noon, I am closing all my offices as a memorial to these babies. Our hearts and prayers go out to all of them. Never again should something like this happen in America.”

11:43 a.m. ET, June 24, 2022

Half of US states could ban abortions as Roe v. Wade is overturned

The Supreme Court on Friday overturned Roe v. Wade, holding that there is no longer a federal constitutional right to an abortion.

Going forward, abortion rights will be determined by states, unless Congress acts.

Legislators in 13 states have passed so-called "trigger laws," meaning that abortion will almost immediately be banned with Roe no longer in effect. In some cases, the law requires an official such as an attorney general to certify that Roe has been struck down before the law can take effect.

Here's a look at where abortion rights stand across the US:

11:16 a.m. ET, June 24, 2022

Louisiana attorney general says trigger law banning abortion in state is in effect

From CNN’s Devon Sayers

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry speaks in Washington, DC on January 7.
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry speaks in Washington, DC on January 7. (Evan Vucci/AP)

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry issued a statement on the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade. Louisiana is one of 13 states with trigger laws that take effect after the court’s decision.

"As noted in both my legal brief to the Supreme Court and the majority’s opinion: the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision," according to his statement.

"Because of the Court’s ruling in this case about a Mississippi law limiting abortions after 15 weeks of gestation with exceptions for health emergencies and fetal abnormalities, Louisiana’s trigger law banning abortion is now in effect," he said.

"My office and I will do everything in our power to ensure the laws of Louisiana that have been passed to protect the unborn are enforceable, even if we have to go back to court," his statement continued.

1:36 p.m. ET, June 24, 2022

How the 9 Supreme Court justices ruled on overturning Roe v. Wade

Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021.
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021. (Erin Schaff/Pool/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade Friday, holding that there is no longer a federal constitutional right to an abortion.

Five justices signed onto the majority opinion, striking down the landmark decision. They are:

  • Clarence Thomas
  • Samuel Alito
  • Brett Kavanaugh
  • Neil Gorsuch
  • Amy Coney Barrett

And three justices dissented:

  • Stephen Breyer
  • Sonia Sotomayor
  • Elena Kagan

Chief Justice John Roberts did not join the majority, writing in a concurring opinion that he would not have overturned Roe but instead would have only upheld Mississippi's law banning abortions after 15 weeks.

11:09 a.m. ET, June 24, 2022

Ruling opens door for reconsidering rights to gay marriage and contraception

From CNN's Tierney Sneed and Ariane de Vogue

The Supreme Court’s opinion on abortion Friday could open the door for courts to overturn same-sex marriage, contraception and other rights. 

It’s already set off a debate among justices over whether overturning Roe puts those precedents in danger. 

The majority opinion attempted to wall of its holding in Friday’s abortion case from those other rulings, but Justice Clarence Thomas wrote separately to call explicitly for those other rulings to be revisited – a concurrence that the liberals seized upon to argue that those rulings are now at risk. 

In their dissent, the liberal justices wrote “no one should be confident that this majority is done with its work.” 

“The right Roe and Casey recognized does not stand alone,” they wrote. “To the contrary, the Court has linked it for decades to other settled freedoms involving bodily integrity, familial relationships, and procreation. Most obviously, the right to terminate a pregnancy arose straight out of the right to purchase and use contraception. In turn, those rights led, more recently, to rights of same-sex intimacy and marriage.” 

The liberals added: “Either the mass of the majority’s opinion is hypocrisy, or additional constitutional rights are under threat. It is one or the other.”  

Justice Samuel Alito, in a new section of the opinion that was not present in the leaked draft, responded to the dissenters’ warnings. 

He emphasized a line the majority opinion that said “[n]othing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” 

“We have also explained why that is so: rights regarding contraception and same-sex relationships are inherently different from the right to abortion because the latter (as we have stressed) uniquely involves what Roe and Casey termed ‘potential life,’” Alito said. 

Alito’s assertions were undercut by a concurrence by Justice Thomas, who explicitly called for the court to reconsider its rulings striking down state restrictions on contraceptives, state sodomy bans and state prohibitions on same sex marriage. 

“Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous,’” Thomas wrote, “we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.” 

The liberal dissenters used Thomas’ concurrence to go after Alito’s assurances that the court was not putting those precedent at risks by overturning Roe. 

“The first problem with the majority’s account comes from JUSTICE THOMAS’s concurrence — which makes clear he is not with the program. In saying that nothing in today’s opinion casts doubt on non-abortion precedents, JUSTICE THOMAS explains, he means only that they are not at issue,” the liberals wrote, as they quoted from Thomas’ concurrence. 

“So at least one Justice is planning to use the ticket of today’s decision again and again and again,” they said.

12:20 p.m. ET, June 24, 2022

Pelosi on SCOTUS ruling: "The hypocrisy is raging, but the harm is endless"

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi reacts to the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, at the Capitol in Washington, on Friday, June 24.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi reacts to the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, at the Capitol in Washington, on Friday, June 24. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also called Friday's Supreme Court ruling a hypocrisy that will cause endless harm.

"The hypocrisy is raging, but the harm is endless. What this means to women is such an insult. It's a slap in face to women about using their own judgment to make their own decisions about their reproductive freedom," she said Friday.

She again criticized the Republicans for supporting pregnancy but opposing "any family planning."

"I always have said: determination of a pregnancy is just their opening act. It's just their front game. Behind it and for years, I have seen in this Congress, opposition to any family planning domestic or global."

Looking ahead to the November elections, she said, reproductive freedom will be on the ballot.

"This is deadly serious," she said. "A woman's right to choose, reproductive freedom is on the ballot in November. We cannot allow them to take charge so that they can institute their goal which is to criminalize reproductive freedom."

12:18 p.m. ET, June 24, 2022

Pelosi: "Republicans are plotting a nationwide abortion ban"

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaks during a press conference on June 24, 2022.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaks during a press conference on June 24, 2022. (Pool)

Speaking after the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the Republicans are "plotting a nationwide abortion ban."

"They cannot be allowed to have majority in the Congress to do that. But that's their goal," she said Friday.

Juxtaposing the Friday ruling against Thursday's ruling on guns, Pelosi criticized the court's stance.

"Such a contradiction. Yesterday, to say the states cannot make laws governing the constitutional right to bear arms. And today, they're saying the exact reverse that the states can overturn a constitutional right — for 50 years a constitutional right for women having the right to choose."

"The hypocrisy is raging, but the harm is endless," she added.

12:15 p.m. ET, June 24, 2022

Broad majority of Americans didn't want Roe v. Wade overturned, polling prior to decision shows

From CNN's Ariel Edwards-Levy

Abortion rights activists react in front of the Supreme Court in Washington on June 24.
Abortion rights activists react in front of the Supreme Court in Washington on June 24. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

A broad majority of Americans did not want to see Roe vs. Wade overturned, polling taken before the Supreme Court's decision shows. Here's a recap of the latest data on the public's views of abortion, from CNN and elsewhere:

Views on overturning Roe vs. Wade 

In a May CNN poll conducted immediately after the leak of the Supreme Court's draft opinion, Americans said, 66% to 34%, that they did not want the Supreme Court to completely overturn its decision. In CNN's polling dating back to 1989, the share of the public in favor of completely overturning Roe has never risen above 36%.

Just 17% of Americans in the CNN poll said they'd be happy to see Roe vs. Wade overturned, with 12% saying they'd be satisfied, 21% that they'd be dissatisfied, 36% that they'd be angry, and 14% that they wouldn't care. Most Democrats (59%) and nearly half of adults younger than 35 (48%) said they'd be angry. And a 59% majority of Americans said they'd support Congress passing a law to establish a nationwide right to abortion, with just 41% opposed.

In a May CBS/YouGov poll, 63% of Americans said they expected that overturning Roe would make abortion access harder for poor women, with 58% saying it would make abortion access more difficult for women of color. Fewer expected similar difficulties for White women (35%) or wealthy women (19%). And a majority of women (54%) said that generally, overturning Roe would make life worse for most American women. 

Views on state abortion laws

In the CNN poll, 58% of US adults said that, if Roe were overturned, they'd want their state to set abortion laws that were more permissive than restrictive. About half (51%) said they'd like to see their state become a safe haven for women who wanted abortions but couldn't get them where they lived. 

But not everyone was aware in advance how their own state would be affected. Of Americans living in states with trigger laws to immediately ban abortion after the overturn of Roe, only 45% realized that was the case, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll conducted in May. Another 42% living in those states were unsure what the impact of the ruling would be where they live.

Political implications

It's still too soon to know how views on abortion might shift in the wake of the Court's decision, or to forecast how the aftermath of the decision might affect the upcoming election. There are some early signs that the blow to abortion access could be particularly motivational to abortion rights supporters. A significant share of core Democratic backers such as young people and women said they would be angry in the wake of the ruling, and several surveys this spring found Democratic voters more likely than Republican voters to see abortion as a highly relevant issue to this year's election. But it’s less clear how that motivation might manifest itself, or to what extent it'll alter the overall political landscape. 

A May poll from Monmouth University found that 48% of Democrats considered a candidate’s alignment with their views on abortion to be extremely important to their vote, up from 31% in 2018; among Republicans, the number was 29%, down from 36% four years ago.

CNN polling conducted immediately before and after the leak of a draft Supreme Court decision on Roe v. Wade found a 7-point rise in the share of Americans who said their views on abortion align more with Democrats than Republicans. But there was little immediate evidence of a sea change in any of the Republicans’ early advantages heading into the midterms.

Views of the Supreme Court

The decision could also affect Americans' views of the Supreme Court. Following the leak of the draft opinion, Marquette Law School polling found, public approval of the Court fell, from 54% in March to 44% in May. The change was largely due to a shift among Democrats: while 49% of Democrats approved of the Supreme Court in March, just 26% felt the same in May. Marquette's May poll also found that 23% of Americans viewed the Supreme Court as "very conservative," an uptick from 15% in March.

11:31 a.m. ET, June 24, 2022

"With sorrow": How the court's 3 liberal justices closed their dissent

Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan issued a dissenting opinion to the Supreme Court's decision that strikes down Roe v. Wade.

In their joint opinion, the three justices heavily criticized the majority, closing:

“With sorrow — for this Court, but more, for the many millions of American women who have today lost a fundamental constitutional protection—we dissent.”